AMERISERV FINANCIAL INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2019

AmeriServ Financial, Inc. — Q2 2019 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. AmeriServ is a Pennsylvania-based banking and financial services company. This unaudited report covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2019; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2018. Amounts below are in millions except per-share data and ratios.

Financial performance and position

  • Q2 earnings: Net income was $1.792 million, up 2.8% from $1.744 million a year earlier. Diluted EPS was $0.10, unchanged. Annualized return on assets was 0.61% and return on equity was 7.24%.
  • First-half earnings: Net income was $3.670 million, up 4.5% from $3.511 million; diluted EPS rose to $0.21 from $0.19. Annualized return on assets was 0.63% and return on equity was 7.53%.
  • Revenue and margins: Q2 net interest income was $9.061 million, up 2.3%, and net interest margin was 3.30% versus 3.28%. First-half net interest income was $17.718 million, up 0.6%, while margin was 3.27% versus 3.28%. Noninterest income was $3.657 million in Q2 and $7.262 million for the half, slightly below the respective prior-year periods.
  • Expenses and credit provision: Noninterest expense rose 1.6% to $10.456 million in Q2 and 1.7% to $20.749 million for the half. The company recorded no Q2 loan-loss provision and a $0.400 million provision recovery for the half, compared with expenses of $0.050 million and $0.100 million in the corresponding 2018 periods.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Assets were $1.191 billion, up 2.6% from year-end. Net loans increased 3.1% to $880.7 million; deposits rose 2.0% to $968.5 million. Cash and cash equivalents were $28.1 million, down $6.8 million. Q2 average loan-to-deposit ratio was 90.1%; management described liquidity as strong and reported $352 million of available overnight FHLB borrowing capacity and $35 million of unsecured correspondent-bank lines.
  • Debt and capital: Total borrowed funds were $112.9 million, including short-term borrowings of $35.2 million, FHLB advances of $53.1 million, and subordinated and junior subordinated debt. Shareholders’ equity was $101.5 million. The company reported a 13.14% total capital ratio, 10.28% common equity tier 1 ratio, and 9.73% tier 1 leverage ratio; the Bank was categorized as well capitalized. Tangible common equity to tangible assets was 7.60%.
  • Cash flow: First-half operating activities provided $4.1 million; investing activities used $28.8 million; financing activities provided $17.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $6.8 million.

Changes, outlook, and matters to monitor

  • Higher loan and investment income supported results, but interest expense rose faster: Q2 interest expense increased 34.9% and first-half expense increased 38.3%, primarily reflecting deposit repricing, competition for deposits, and higher borrowing costs. Management noted movement of customer funds toward higher-yielding certificates of deposit.
  • Loan growth returned in Q2; loans increased $27 million in the first half. First-half average loans remained below the prior-year average, while average deposits and investment securities increased. Management said it expects the loan-to-deposit ratio to grow moderately through the rest of 2019 and expressed confidence in positive momentum in the second half; no formal earnings guidance was provided.
  • Asset quality remained strong by management’s assessment: nonperforming assets, including TDRs, were $1.681 million (0.19% of loans and OREO); first-half net charge-offs were $0.169 million, or 0.04% of loans. The allowance was $8.102 million, 0.91% of loans and 482% of nonperforming assets, down from 1.00% of loans and 629% coverage at year-end.
  • Credit concentration merits attention: non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans were 344% of regulatory capital; the 25 largest credits were 25.6% of loans. Commitments to extend credit totaled $227.6 million and standby letters of credit $16.3 million. Management did not expect these commitments or routine legal claims to have a material adverse effect.
  • The company repurchased 161,554 shares for $0.686 million in Q2 under a new authorization to repurchase up to approximately 526,000 shares over 12 months, and declared $0.785 million of common dividends in the first half. Management’s stated strategic goal is 10% year-over-year EPS growth and returning up to 75% of earnings through dividends and repurchases, subject to capital needs; these are objectives, not a forecast.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity analysis showed modeled net interest income increasing 2.8% under a 100-basis-point rate increase and decreasing 4.2% under a 100-basis-point decrease. Results depend on assumptions about repricing and prepayments. The company cited economic, rate, credit, competitive, regulatory, and market risks.
  • AmeriServ adopted lease accounting in January 2019, recognizing about $4.2 million of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, with no opening retained-earnings adjustment. The expected effect of the forthcoming CECL credit-loss standard remained undetermined; the company was monitoring a proposed delay for smaller reporting companies.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls were effective at June 30, 2019, and reported no material quarterly change in internal control over financial reporting. The filing reported no material legal proceedings and listed risk factors as not applicable.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth and deposit growth continue, and how deposit pricing affects net interest margin and funding costs.
  • Commercial real estate and large-credit concentrations, criticized-loan trends, and whether the allowance remains adequate as CECL implementation approaches.
  • Liquidity and funding capacity under different deposit and loan-growth conditions, including reliance on FHLB borrowings and the availability of pledged collateral.
  • Actual share repurchases, dividend levels, and capital ratios relative to management’s shareholder-return objectives and balance-sheet growth plans.
  • The assumptions behind interest-rate sensitivity estimates and the ultimate timing and financial impact of CECL adoption.