CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

Cincinnati Financial Corporation — Q1 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2012; unaudited. Comparisons are with the three months ended March 31, 2011 unless otherwise noted. Dollar amounts are in millions except per-share data.

Business context

The company primarily writes property and casualty insurance through independent agencies, alongside life insurance and investment operations. Its reporting segments are commercial lines, personal lines, excess and surplus lines, life insurance and investments.

Financial results and position

MetricQ1 2012Q1 2011 / comparator
Total revenues$986$929
Net income$86$61
Diluted earnings per share$0.53$0.38
Comprehensive income$232$147
Net cash provided by operating activities$148$57
Investment income, net of expenses, pretax$131$131
Property-casualty combined ratio99.1%104.1%
  • Earned premiums increased 7% to $839; realized investment gains, net, were $13 versus $12. Income before taxes was $112 versus $75.
  • Property-casualty net written premiums grew 8% to $843. Underwriting produced a $9 gain versus a $30 loss. The consolidated combined ratio improved 5.0 percentage points, to 99.1%.
  • Segment results varied: commercial lines earned a $34 underwriting profit and a 94.2% combined ratio; personal lines had a $22 underwriting loss and a 110.9% combined ratio; excess and surplus lines had a $3 underwriting loss and a 113.6% combined ratio. The life segment reported a $3 loss; investment operations profit was $123.
  • At March 31, total assets were $16.022 billion, shareholders’ equity $5.207 billion and book value per share $32.07, up from $31.03 at year-end 2011. Cash and cash equivalents were $424.
  • Total debt was $894, comprising $104 short-term and $790 long-term. Debt-to-total-capital was 14.7%, versus 15.1% at year-end. The $150 revolving credit line was due to mature in July 2012; management expected to establish a replacement line with $225 capacity by the end of Q2.
  • Cash dividends paid were $64; the quarterly dividend declared was $0.4025 per share. The company reported no share repurchases in the quarter.

Material changes and drivers

  • Net income rose 41%, principally reflecting improved property-casualty underwriting. Management said stronger underlying underwriting results offset higher catastrophe losses; investment-segment and life-segment results were broadly unchanged on the reported segment basis.
  • Current-quarter catastrophe losses were $111 for the current accident year, versus $42 a year earlier. Prior-year reserve development was favorable by $116, compared with $58. Together, catastrophe experience and reserve releases materially affected reported underwriting results.
  • Personal lines’ combined ratio worsened to 110.9%, with catastrophe losses contributing 28.2 percentage points. Homeowner was the most significant personal-lines profitability challenge. Commercial lines improved to a 94.2% ratio; its results included $90 of favorable prior-year reserve development.
  • Investment income remained flat despite a larger average portfolio; average pretax yield declined to 4.5% from 4.6%. The investment portfolio’s fair value increased to $12.087 billion from $11.735 billion at year-end, contributing to higher other comprehensive income and equity.
  • The company recorded $16 of other-than-temporary impairment charges, nearly all from three common stocks; it reported $30 in Q1 2011. Net realized investment gains were $13.
  • Adoption of insurance-acquisition-cost accounting standard ASU 2010-26 reduced December 31, 2011 shareholders’ equity by $22 after tax, or $0.13 per share, on a retrospective basis. The filing reports a $1 reduction to Q1 2012 net income compared with the adjusted Q1 2011 presentation. Other adopted accounting updates had no material impact.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • The filing provides no new consolidated earnings guidance. Management’s stated long-term targets include a 95%–100% property-casualty GAAP combined ratio over a five-year period and an average annual value creation ratio of 12%–15% for 2010–2014. Q1 value creation ratio was 4.6%.
  • Management cited pricing improvements, predictive analytics, claims and loss-control initiatives, process improvements, geographic expansion and agency appointments as priorities. It expected additional personal-auto rate increases beginning in Q2 2012 and continued homeowner pricing actions.
  • Management highlighted the prolonged low-interest-rate environment as a constraint on reinvestment yields. About 20% of fixed maturities were scheduled to mature from April 2012 through December 2014, at an average pretax yield-to-amortized-cost of 5.2%; management cautioned that replacing yields may be challenging.
  • Key risks include catastrophe severity and concentration, claims frequency and severity, reserve-estimate uncertainty, equity-market declines, low interest rates, credit-market disruption, competition, reinsurance availability and collectability, regulation, litigation, and technology or cybersecurity events.
  • Legal proceedings were described as ordinary-course matters; management considered accrued probable and estimable losses reasonable and not material, but said outcomes exceeding accruals could materially affect results or cash flows. For certain other matters with more-than-remote loss risk, potential losses could not be reasonably estimated. Risk factors were reported as not materially changed from the 2011 Form 10-K.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of the underwriting improvement persists after the $116 of favorable prior-year reserve development, and whether reserve assumptions remain adequate.
  • Whether catastrophe losses normalize, particularly in personal homeowner business, and whether rate changes improve its combined ratio.
  • Whether premium growth and pricing gains translate into sustainable underwriting profitability across segments.
  • How low rates, investment maturities, equity valuations and any future impairment charges affect investment income, book value and capital.
  • The replacement credit-line terms and continued liquidity and capital strength, alongside the company’s dividend and pension-funding commitments.