FIRST UNITED CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2018

First United Corporation — Q1 2018 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2018; balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2017. First United is a bank holding company whose primary subsidiary is First United Bank & Trust. Financial amounts below are in millions unless otherwise stated.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ1 2018 / March 31, 2018Comparable period / prior year-end
Net interest income$10.58$9.37 in Q1 2017
Provision for loan losses$0.45$0.61 in Q1 2017
Noninterest income$3.68$3.46 in Q1 2017
Noninterest expense$10.69$9.46 in Q1 2017
Net income$2.51$1.98 in Q1 2017
Net income available to common shareholders$2.51; EPS $0.35$1.44; EPS $0.22 in Q1 2017
Fully tax-equivalent net interest margin3.68%3.27% in Q1 2017; 3.37% for full-year 2017
Total assets$1,319.4$1,336.5 at December 31, 2017
Gross loans / net loans$937.5 / $927.0$892.5 / $882.5 at December 31, 2017
Total deposits$1,017.9$1,039.4 at December 31, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$21.2$83.8 at December 31, 2017
Short-term / long-term borrowings$55.2 / $115.9$48.8 / $120.9 at December 31, 2017
Shareholders’ equity$111.1$108.4 at December 31, 2017
  • Operating cash flow was $3.2 million, investing cash use was $45.0 million, and financing cash use was $20.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell $62.5 million during the quarter.
  • Annualized return on average assets was 0.76% and return on average equity was 9.13%, compared with 0.61% and 7.00%, respectively, in Q1 2017. Average equity to average assets was 8.34%, versus 8.71%.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $10.47 million, or 1.12% of gross loans. The quarter recorded $0.05 million in net recoveries; the allowance ratio was 1.29% in Q1 2017.
  • Regulatory capital ratios at March 31 included consolidated total capital of 16.06%, Tier 1 capital of 15.01%, common equity Tier 1 of 12.59%, and Tier 1 leverage of 11.45%. The Bank was also above the disclosed “well capitalized” thresholds.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Common earnings rose from $1.44 million to $2.51 million, and EPS increased from $0.22 to $0.35. The prior-year comparison included $0.54 million of preferred dividends; all Series A preferred stock had been redeemed by November 2017.
  • Net interest income increased $1.21 million year over year. Management attributed the improvement to higher loan balances and yields, including repricing and new lending, and lower interest expense as long-term borrowings declined. The FTE margin improved 41 basis points.
  • Loan balances grew $45.0 million, or 5.0%, from year-end. Growth included purchases of a $15 million residential mortgage pool and a $10 million student loan pool, as well as CRE growth.
  • Deposits declined $21.5 million from year-end. Cash fell by $62.5 million, while net loans increased and the company purchased loans and invested in premises and equipment.
  • Operating expenses rose $1.24 million year over year, including higher salaries and benefits, insurance claims, technology and occupancy costs, and OREO expenses. OREO expense increased to $0.39 million, including $0.30 million of fair-value write-downs.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • Outlook: The filing provides no quantitative earnings or revenue guidance. Management said operating results for the quarter are not necessarily indicative of full-year or future results.
  • Credit quality: Nonaccrual loans declined to $4.3 million from $7.1 million at year-end, primarily after payoffs totaling $2.5 million. However, accruing loans past due 30 days or more increased to 1.14% of loans from 0.63%, primarily due to one large commercial A&D relationship. Management considered the allowance adequate; actual losses may differ from estimates.
  • Investment valuation: The $16.0 million CDO portfolio is Level 3 and consists of 10 pooled trust-preferred securities in an inactive market. It carried $3.7 million of unrealized losses. Management reported no credit-related OTTI charges in Q1, but valuation depends on third-party discounted-cash-flow estimates and unobservable assumptions.
  • Interest-rate risk: The company described itself as asset sensitive, but its modeled one-year net interest income response varied by scenario: +100 basis points was estimated to add $0.2 million, while +400 basis points was estimated to reduce NII by $1.3 million. Management cautioned that assumptions and market conditions could change outcomes.
  • Funding and liquidity: Management stated it believed liquidity was adequate and identified available correspondent, Federal Reserve discount-window, and FHLB facilities. Deposits declined while short-term borrowings increased by $6.4 million; liquidity and funding costs remain relevant to monitor.
  • Tax and accounting: The effective tax rate fell to 20.5% from 28.6%, mainly reflecting the federal corporate tax rate reduction from 35% to 21%. Adoption of the new revenue-recognition standard did not materially change revenue measurement or timing. The company expects the new lease standard to increase reported assets and liabilities; it was assessing the impact of the expected-credit-loss standard.
  • Other disclosures: There were no legal proceedings reported, no material change in internal control over financial reporting, and no material changes to risk factors identified by management. Standby letters of credit totaled $2.7 million; total disclosed credit commitments, including these letters, were $133.1 million.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether the quarter’s margin and earnings improvement is sustainable as deposit pricing and borrowing costs respond to interest rates.
  2. Whether loan growth from purchased portfolios and new commercial relationships maintains credit quality, especially the past-due A&D relationship.
  3. The assumptions, independent valuation inputs, and potential downside associated with the Level 3 CDO portfolio and its $3.7 million unrealized loss.
  4. How the $62.5 million cash decline and $21.5 million deposit reduction affect liquidity, reliance on borrowings, and funding expense in subsequent quarters.
  5. Whether elevated operating costs and OREO valuation losses moderate, and how the lower tax rate affects future effective tax rates.
  6. The eventual balance-sheet and credit-loss effects of the forthcoming lease and expected-credit-loss accounting standards.