GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD. quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. — Q2 2015 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Financial amounts are in U.S. dollars; amounts below are in millions unless noted. Greenlight Re is a specialty property and casualty reinsurer, with results affected by underwriting experience and a value-oriented long/short investment portfolio.

Financial performance and position

  • Q2 results: Net loss was $39.6 million, or $1.06 per share, versus net income of $109.6 million, or $2.94 per share, in Q2 2014. Total revenue fell to $67.6 million from $200.4 million, principally reflecting a swing from $113.9 million of investment income to a $20.3 million investment loss.
  • First-half results: Net loss was $63.6 million, or $1.71 per share, versus net income of $100.7 million, or $2.71 per share, in the first half of 2014. Total revenue was $139.2 million, down from $302.1 million; net investment loss was $45.1 million compared with $103.8 million of investment income.
  • Underwriting: First-half net premiums earned were $186.5 million, down from $199.5 million. Net losses incurred rose to $139.9 million from $124.0 million, while acquisition costs declined to $50.8 million from $63.4 million. The six-month composite ratio was 102.2% versus 93.9%; the combined ratio, including general and administrative expenses, was 109.2% versus 99.8%. A ratio above 100% indicates underwriting losses.
  • Investment returns: The DME-managed portfolio returned negative 1.5% in Q2 and negative 3.2% for the first half, compared with positive 8.1% and 7.3%, respectively, in 2014. First-half short and macro positions detracted, partly offset by gains on long positions. No performance allocation was recorded in 2015 due to investment losses; management fees were $10.4 million for the first half.
  • Balance sheet at June 30: Total assets were $3.425 billion and total equity was $1.127 billion, compared with $2.995 billion and $1.194 billion at December 31, 2014. Adjusted book value per share, a non-GAAP measure, was $29.07 fully diluted, down 5.5% from year-end; basic adjusted book value per share was $29.34, down 5.9%.
  • Cash and liquidity: Cash and cash equivalents were $91.0 million; restricted cash was $1.649 billion, up from $1.297 billion at year-end, and is largely pledged as collateral. Operating cash flow was negative $14.8 million for the first half, compared with negative $39.1 million in 2014; investing activities provided $98.0 million, primarily reflecting increased prime-broker borrowing. Management said it expects liquidity to meet foreseeable needs and plans to fund the next 12 months from operating cash flow.
  • Borrowings and collateral: “Due to prime brokers” totaled $515.1 million, up from $211.1 million at year-end. This included $212.7 million for investment purchases and $302.3 million borrowed to collateralize letters of credit. The company had $720 million of letter-of-credit capacity, with $299 million issued and $416.1 million of assets pledged as collateral.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Gross premiums written increased 46% to $222.7 million for the first half, while net premiums earned decreased about 7%. Growth in motor, professional liability, health, and new quota-share contracts was partly offset by reduced Florida homeowners’ premiums and non-renewed catastrophe retrocession business.
  • Underwriting deteriorated, chiefly due to $14.7 million of adverse development on a general liability contract in run-off. The company increased estimated average loss cost per claim following updated information and actuarial review. Florida homeowners’ losses also developed adversely, including sinkhole deterioration and water-damage claims.
  • Loss reserves increased to $270.4 million from $264.2 million at year-end. First-half adverse development on prior-period contracts was $16.9 million, partly offset by favorable developments and commission adjustments.
  • Short securities sold, not yet purchased rose 17.8% to $1.285 billion; reported short exposure increased to 83.3% from 66.9% at year-end. Long exposure was 104.2%, down from 105.8%; net long exposure was 20.9%.
  • Notes receivable increased to $29.9 million from $1.6 million after a ceding-insurer settlement converted receivables into a ten-year note. Of the June balance, $24.8 million was on non-accrual status. The company stated management expected the recorded notes to be collectible.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management gave no numerical earnings or premium guidance. It expects competitive conditions and excess industry capital to pressure pricing, particularly for peak-zone catastrophe excess-of-loss business. It may maintain or reduce premium writings rather than accept risks it considers mispriced, while pursuing customized and capacity-constrained opportunities.
  • The investment objective for 2015 is capital protection and positive returns. Management expected to continue holding significant gold, foreign-exchange options, sovereign-debt shorts, and sovereign credit-default swaps. It cautioned that underwriting and investment results may vary substantially and historical returns may not predict future results.
  • Market risks include equity, commodity, currency, interest-rate, credit, political, and short-sale risks. A 10% fall in listed equity and equity-derivative prices was estimated to reduce portfolio fair value by $24.4 million; a 10% fall in gold was estimated to reduce it by $13.8 million. Short positions can have theoretically unlimited loss potential.
  • Greek exchange-traded securities were transferred to Level 3 fair-value classification after trading on the Athens Stock Exchange was halted. Values relied on adjusted last-trade prices and other estimates; associated derivatives also used unobservable inputs.
  • Natural-peril exposure as of July 1, 2015 was reported at a maximum aggregate $268.5 million, net of retrocession and reinstatement premiums. Retrocessionaires’ failure to pay could leave the company responsible for claims; the company reported $2.9 million of recoverables from unrated retrocessionaires and no required provision for uncollectibility.
  • Management reported compliance with letter-of-credit covenants and regulatory minimum capital requirements. The subsidiaries’ “A (Excellent)” A.M. Best ratings are important to writing new business; a downgrade below “A-” or withdrawal could significantly restrict underwriting capacity.
  • The filing highlights proposed U.S. tax-rule changes and legislation that could affect whether the company qualifies for the foreign-insurance-company exception to PFIC rules, potentially materially affecting U.S. shareholders and requiring changes to operations. The company said the outcome was uncertain.
  • Other notable items: 140,000 Class A shares were repurchased during the first half at an average Q2 price of $30.28; another 360,000 shares were repurchased through August 1 at an average $28.95. A specialist service agreement was scheduled to terminate September 1, 2015, with $0.6 million of minimum post-termination payments. Management said existing disputes were not expected to have a material adverse effect.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether the $14.7 million general-liability reserve strengthening and other adverse development are sufficient, and how claims experience changes in subsequent periods.
  2. Collection and impairment status of the $24.8 million non-accrual notes receivable, including the ten-year ceding-insurer settlement note.
  3. Investment performance, valuation assumptions for Level 3 assets, and liquidity/collateral demands under the short and derivative positions.
  4. Prime-broker borrowing, restricted-cash requirements, and letter-of-credit capacity and covenant compliance as exposures change.
  5. Developments in U.S. PFIC rules and legislation, and any effect on U.S. shareholders or the company’s business structure.
  6. Whether premium growth translates into earned premiums and profitable underwriting, given the 102.2% first-half composite ratio and management’s selective-writing approach.