NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2014

Norwood Financial Corp. — Q3 2014 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014. Unaudited consolidated results include Norwood Financial Corp. and its banking subsidiaries. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless otherwise stated.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2014 / Sept. 30, 2014Comparable period / prior year-end
Net income$2.118; diluted EPS $0.58Q3 2013: $2.136; $0.59
Nine-month net income$6.116; diluted EPS $1.682013: $6.284; $1.73
Total interest incomeQ3: $6.941; nine months: $20.869Q3 2013: $7.146; nine months 2013: $21.259
Net interest incomeQ3: $6.154; nine months: $18.454Q3 2013: $6.270; nine months 2013: $18.516
Net interest margin, tax-equivalentQ3: 3.92%; nine months: 3.91%Q3 2013: 4.05%; nine months 2013: 4.04%
Total assets$718.2$711.2 at Dec. 31, 2013
Loans receivable, net$495.2; allowance $5.651$497.4; allowance $5.708 at Dec. 31, 2013
Deposits$548.3$541.2 at Dec. 31, 2013
Borrowings$44.7 short-term; $22.6 other$49.9 short-term; $23.8 other at Dec. 31, 2013
Stockholders’ equity$97.4$91.9 at Dec. 31, 2013
Operating cash flowNine months: $7.753$9.659 in 2013

For the first nine months, cash and cash equivalents rose $5.4 to $13.3. Investing activities provided $0.1, while financing activities used $2.4. Available-for-sale securities were $158.7; together with cash and cash equivalents, management reported $172.0 of liquidity, or 23.9% of assets. The company said liquidity was adequate. Regulatory capital ratios at September 30 included Tier 1 capital of 12.48% of average assets and total capital of 18.09% of risk-weighted assets; the company and bank were in compliance with applicable requirements.

Changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 net income decreased $18,000 year over year. Lower net interest income was partly offset by $100,000 more in gains on sales of loans and securities.
  • Nine-month net income fell $168,000. Lower bank-owned life insurance income and proceeds (down $710,000 from 2013), higher foreclosed-real-estate costs (up $239,000), and higher income tax expense (up $202,000) more than offset a lower loan-loss provision and increased securities and loan-sale gains.
  • Nine-month net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was nearly flat, up $22,000, while margin declined to 3.91% from 4.04%. Management attributed the pressure mainly to lower loan yields in a low-rate environment, partly offset by growth in average earning assets and lower funding costs.
  • Nonperforming loans declined to $5.9 from $9.5 at year-end, but nonperforming assets increased to $10.9 from $10.6, in part as two properties totaling $4.2 were transferred to foreclosed real estate. Foreclosed real estate rose to $5.0 from $1.0.
  • Deposits increased $7.2, with growth in demand, NOW and money-market accounts offset partly by lower time deposits. Commercial real estate loans declined $10.2; commercial loans increased $6.2.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • The filing provides no earnings or revenue guidance. Management cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year or future results.
  • Management considered the $5.651 allowance for loan losses adequate, but stated it may not cover significant future losses. The allowance was 1.13% of loans; nine-month net charge-offs were $1.317, versus $1.943 in 2013.
  • Credit quality and concentration merit attention: nonperforming assets were 1.52% of assets; hospitality lodging exposures were $36.1, or 40.6% of capital. The company recorded a $422,000 write-down on a motel property sold in 2014 and $227,000 of write-downs on two troubled debt restructuring loans.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments totaled $78.0: $26.5 of unfunded loan commitments, $45.8 of unfunded lines of credit and $5.7 of standby letters of credit. The filing notes that commitments may not be fully drawn; standby-letter liabilities were not material.
  • Interest-rate risk remains a key exposure. A simulated 200-basis-point increase was within company policy limits; a 200-basis-point decrease exceeded the policy limit, though management characterized the risk as acceptable. Management also noted potential volatility in securities’ fair values and accumulated other comprehensive income.
  • Other identified risks include regional economic conditions, commercial lending and real-estate collateral, loan losses, liquidity, capital availability, regulation, competition, and interest rates. The company reported no material change in its previously disclosed risk factors. Legal proceedings were listed as not applicable.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material quarterly change in internal control over financial reporting. No other special guidance was provided.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the lower loan yields and net interest margin stabilize, and how rate changes affect funding costs and asset repricing.
  • Whether the rise in foreclosed real estate and property-related costs reverses, and whether nonperforming loans continue to decline.
  • The adequacy of the loan-loss allowance against commercial real estate exposures, sector concentrations and future charge-offs.
  • The sustainability of earnings excluding 2013’s nonrecurring life-insurance proceeds and the contribution from realized securities gains.
  • Liquidity, deposit mix, borrowing levels and potential funding needs if customer commitments are drawn.
  • Fair-value changes in the securities portfolio and any resulting effects on equity and comprehensive income.