WESTAMERICA BANCORPORATION quarterly report, Q1 FY2011

Westamerica Bancorporation — Q1 2011 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period

Unaudited results for the three months ended March 31, 2011; balance-sheet comparisons are against December 31, 2010. Westamerica is a California bank holding company serving customers primarily in Northern and Central California. The filing cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Financial performance and position

  • Earnings: Net income was $22.4 million, down 5.1% from $23.6 million in Q1 2010 and down from $23.7 million in Q4 2010. Diluted EPS was $0.77 versus $0.80 and $0.81, respectively. Quarterly dividends were $0.36 per share.
  • Revenue and margins: GAAP net interest income was $50.2 million versus $52.5 million a year earlier; fully taxable-equivalent (FTE, a non-GAAP measure) net interest income was $55.0 million, down 3.6%. Noninterest income was $14.7 million, down 4.7%. FTE net interest margin declined to 5.35% from 5.60%; the efficiency ratio rose to 44.9% from 44.2%.
  • Expenses and taxes: Noninterest expense fell 2.2% to $31.3 million. The loan-loss provision remained $2.8 million. Income tax expense was $8.4 million GAAP ($13.2 million FTE).
  • Cash flow: Operating activities provided $32.5 million. Cash and due from banks increased $9.4 million to $348.2 million. Financing activities used $24.7 million, including $10.5 million of dividends, $12.0 million of stock repurchases, and a $13.0 million reduction in short-term borrowings.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Total assets were $4.94 billion, nearly unchanged from year-end. Deposits were $4.14 billion, up slightly. Net loans were $2.80 billion, down from $2.89 billion. Management described liquidity as strong; the company had more than $700 million of overnight borrowing lines, none drawn, and projected $62.2 million of securities paydowns and maturities in Q2 2011.
  • Debt and capital: At quarter-end, short-term borrowings were $104.4 million, FHLB advances $51.5 million, and parent-company debt $26.1 million. Total capital to risk-adjusted assets was 15.79%, and the equity-to-assets ratio was 11.16%. The company said it intended to redeem its $10 million subordinated note in August 2011, at an estimated premium of about 5%.
  • Credit: The allowance for loan losses was $34.3 million; the broader allowance for credit losses, including off-balance-sheet exposure, was $37.0 million versus $38.3 million at year-end. Net charge-offs were approximately $4.1 million. Originated loans past due 30 days or more rose to $42.3 million from $35.5 million at year-end; originated nonaccrual loans were $21.5 million versus $20.9 million.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Lower loan balances and earning-asset yields drove most of the year-over-year decline in FTE net interest income; growth in investments and lower funding costs partly offset the pressure. Average originated loans were down $163 million year over year, while average investment balances were higher.
  • Deposit service charges fell $1.2 million year over year, partly reflecting overdraft-fee regulations effective July 2010. Noninterest income also included a $400,000 gain on sale of other assets.
  • Lower personnel costs contributed to reduced operating expenses. Sonoma Valley Bank integration was completed in February 2011; Q1 included $679,000 of pretax pre-integration costs and $393,000 after tax, or about $0.01 per diluted share.
  • Available-for-sale securities increased to $741.6 million from $671.5 million at year-end. Accumulated other comprehensive income rose to $2.5 million from $0.2 million, reflecting higher net unrealized gains.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • No specific earnings or revenue guidance was provided. Management anticipated maintaining cash levels for the rest of 2011, expected quarterly dividends to continue subject to board discretion and relevant financial conditions, and expected capital to remain above regulatory “well-capitalized” standards.
  • Management characterized the interest-rate position as neutral to slightly asset-sensitive. Its simulations estimated no meaningful earnings change under the stated base scenario or a scenario with a 100-basis-point federal funds rate increase and a 60-basis-point increase in the 10-year Treasury yield. Results remain sensitive to assumptions and balance-sheet changes.
  • Credit risk remains a key exposure, particularly real-estate-secured lending and covered assets concentrated in economically weak areas of California’s Central Valley. The FDIC generally absorbs 80% of covered-asset losses within the first tier and 95% above the stated threshold, subject to agreement terms. Management considered the purchased-loan credit discounts adequate but disclosed potential exposure if losses exceed estimates.
  • Unrealized losses on some securities were attributed to market conditions; management said it did not intend, and was not more likely than not required, to sell them before recovery. Future economic deterioration, rating declines, or reduced market liquidity could cause impairment.
  • The company disclosed ordinary-course threatened or filed litigation concerning loan collections, deposit transaction posting and overdraft fees, and employment practices. It records a liability when loss is probable and estimable. No troubled debt restructurings were reported at quarter-end.
  • The filing identifies economic weakness, competition, interest-rate and liquidity risks, regulation, operational risks, and natural disasters among factors that could affect results. Management did not expect a significant financial impact from Japan’s earthquake and tsunami but noted possible indirect effects, including supply-chain disruption and asset-value changes.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan demand, asset yields, and net interest margin stabilize, and how continuing reliance on lower-yielding securities affects earnings.
  • Trends in delinquencies, classified and nonaccrual loans, charge-offs, real-estate collateral values, and adequacy of the allowance and purchased-loan discounts.
  • Actual FDIC reimbursements and covered-asset losses relative to the loss-sharing thresholds and remaining estimated credit discounts.
  • Whether the planned August 2011 subordinated-note redemption occurs as described and its effects on cash and regulatory capital.
  • Effects of overdraft-fee rules, Sonoma integration costs, and new FDIC assessment rules on recurring income and expenses.
  • Liquidity and capital resilience if deposits, loan demand, securities values, or market access change; dividend continuation remains subject to board review.