American Water Works Company, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2010

American Water Works Company, Inc. — Q2 2010 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010. Unaudited consolidated results; dollar figures below are in millions unless stated otherwise. The company owns regulated water and wastewater utilities and also provides non-regulated services.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ2 2010Q2 2009Six months 2010Six months 2009
Operating revenue$671.2$612.7$1,259.3$1,162.9
Operating income (loss)$196.0$157.2$322.0$(178.2)
Net income (loss)$72.8$52.0$103.6$(361.1)
Diluted EPS$0.42$0.32$0.59$(2.23)
  • Q2 operating margin was approximately 29.2%, versus 25.7% a year earlier; net margin was approximately 10.8%, versus 8.5%.
  • Six-month 2010 operating margin was approximately 25.6%. The prior-year loss included a $450.0 million goodwill impairment charge ($443.0 million net of tax); no impairment was recorded in 2010.
  • Operating cash flow for the first half was $297.5 million, compared with $228.7 million. Investing cash use was $331.2 million, including $327.3 million of capital expenditures; financing cash provided was $32.1 million. Cash ended at $20.6 million.
  • At June 30, total assets were $13.77 billion and stockholders’ equity was $4.04 billion. Balance-sheet long-term debt was $5.31 billion, its current portion $44.0 million, and short-term debt $265.8 million. Short-term debt increased from $119.5 million at year-end 2009.
  • Current assets of $590.1 million were below current liabilities of $753.4 million, a reported working-capital deficit of $163.3 million. The company reported $850 million of revolving credit commitments and $807.5 million available at June 30; it had no borrowings on the revolving credit line then. Cash and commercial-paper capacity figures also vary by date in the filing.

Material changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Q2 revenue rose $58.5 million (9.5%); first-half revenue rose $96.4 million (8.3%). Rate increases were the main regulated-business driver, with higher demand also contributing. Regulated revenue increased $47.3 million in Q2 and $69.5 million for the first half.
  • Non-regulated revenue grew $11.1 million in Q2 and $28.0 million in the first half, largely reflecting the December 2009 Contract Operations acquisition and higher military contract activity.
  • Operating expenses increased $19.7 million in Q2. First-half expenses excluding the prior-year impairment increased $46.1 million, driven by acquisition-related costs, employee expenses, maintenance, depreciation and taxes.
  • Net interest expense rose $5.0 million in Q2 and $11.8 million for the first half, primarily due to 2009 refinancing of short-term borrowing into higher-rate long-term debt and borrowing for capital investment.
  • First-half water sales volume declined 2.4% for residential customers, while commercial and industrial volumes increased 1.2% and 9.8%, respectively. Management cited possible effects from economic conditions, weather and conservation, but said individual effects were difficult to measure.
  • Quarterly dividends increased from $0.20 to $0.21 per share in 2010. A $0.22-per-share dividend was declared July 30, payable September 1, 2010.

Outlook, management commentary, risks and contingencies

  • Management estimated 2010 company-funded capital investment of $800 million to $1 billion and expected to be near the lower end of the range based on then-current projections. Capital spending was delayed by severe weather and lower treatment-plant expenditures than in 2009.
  • The company reported $118.6 million of annualized general rate increases authorized in Q2, plus $2.0 million of infrastructure charges. As of August 3, it awaited final orders in eight states on requests for $223.9 million of additional annualized revenue; requested increases are not assured.
  • A planned enterprise-systems initiative, with SAP selected for three systems, could cost up to $280 million over approximately five years. The program was included in the capital-investment outlook.
  • Seasonality makes interim results not necessarily indicative of full-year results; operating cash flows are typically weighted toward the third quarter. The company cited rate-regulatory recovery and timing, customer usage, weather, economic conditions, capital needs and access to financing as factors affecting results and liquidity.
  • Management expected higher future medical benefit expense from health-care reform and claims experience. The legislation prompted a $27.1 million reduction in deferred tax assets and increase in regulatory assets during the first half.
  • Legal matters had approximately $3.5 million accrued as probable costs; reasonably possible additional losses were estimated up to $13.3 million, with some matters not estimable. Environmental remediation accruals were $6.8 million. The company said it did not expect claims to materially harm results, financial position or cash flows.
  • The national benefits agreement with most regulated-business unions expired July 31, 2010; negotiations were continuing. Management had contingency plans and did not expect a work stoppage to have a material adverse impact.
  • The company was in compliance with its debt covenants at June 30, including a 0.58 debt-to-capitalization ratio against a 0.70 limit. California and Ohio subsidiaries failed a mortgage-indenture interest-coverage test and therefore could not issue new secured debt. Credit ratings were Moody’s Baa2/P2 and S&P BBB+/A-2.
  • Post-quarter financing included a $150 million New Jersey bond refunding, with estimated annual interest savings of $1.2 million, and a $100 million interest-rate swap converting fixed-rate debt to a variable rate. The filing identifies derivative valuation, hedge effectiveness and counterparty performance as risks.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Progress and final outcomes of pending rate cases, including how much of the $223.9 million request is ultimately approved and when rates become effective.
  • Whether capital spending remains near the lower end of the $800 million–$1 billion estimate, and the costs and schedule of the systems program.
  • Commercial-paper use, available credit capacity, refinancing costs, debt maturities and compliance with subsidiary-level debt tests.
  • Whether revenue growth persists despite lower residential water volumes, and whether acquisition-related operating costs and expected synergies develop as planned.
  • Future pension, postretirement medical, environmental and legal obligations, as well as outcomes of labor negotiations and the interest-rate swap.