Cnfinance Holdings Ltd. annual report, Q4 FY2018

Business context and reporting period

CNFinance Holdings Limited’s Form 20-F is an audited annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, prepared under U.S. GAAP. It is not a standalone fourth-quarter filing; the supplied filing text does not provide a clear set of Q4-only financial results. The company facilitates real-estate-secured loans, primarily to micro and small-enterprise owners in China, mainly through trust-company funding arrangements. Its November 2018 IPO generated approximately US$45.7 million in net proceeds.

Key financial metrics

Amounts below are in RMB unless otherwise noted. The company reports that trust plans are consolidated in its financial statements, including senior-unit funding and related assets and liabilities.

MetricFY 2018FY 2017Change / context
Total operating incomeRMB2.338 billionRMB2.013 billionUp 16.2%
Net interest and fees incomeRMB2.350 billionRMB2.001 billionUp 17.5%
Provision for credit lossesRMB433.8 millionRMB306.8 millionUp 41.4%
Operating expensesRMB746.7 millionRMB897.6 millionDown 16.8%
Income before taxRMB1.158 billionRMB808.7 million
Net incomeRMB860.9 millionRMB532.7 millionUp 61.6%; diluted EPS RMB0.62, versus RMB0.40
Net cash from operating activitiesRMB1.333 billionRMB1.287 billion
Cash and cash equivalents at year-endRMB3.162 billionRMB1.190 billionIncludes RMB2.457 billion in trust structure funds restricted to loan-related activities
Net loans receivableRMB14.998 billionRMB16.261 billionDown 7.8%
Interest-bearing borrowingsRMB15.325 billionRMB15.708 billionDown 2.4%
Total liabilities / shareholders’ equityRMB16.309 billion / RMB3.046 billionRMB16.385 billion / RMB1.831 billionReported leverage ratio (assets/equity) was 6.4x, versus 9.9x

Loan originations fell 44.4% to RMB9.531 billion, from RMB17.071 billion; borrower count declined 31.8% to 16,167. Trust lending funded 99.5% of 2018 originations. Approximate net margin on reported total operating income was 36.8%, compared with 26.5% in 2017; this is a simple calculation from filing figures, not a company-reported margin.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Despite lower loan originations and a smaller year-end net loan balance, annual interest and fees income rose 25.6%, reflecting higher average outstanding loan principal; higher interest expense and credit-loss provisions partly offset the increase.
  • Credit costs and delinquency indicators worsened: provision expense rose 41.4%; aggregate delinquency rate increased to 7.58% from 4.26%. Aggregate NPL rate was 1.05%, versus 1.00%. The company changed its principal performance presentation to aggregate rates, which use cumulative originations as the denominator and are not directly comparable with conventional portfolio ratios.
  • The allowance ratio increased to 5.44% from 2.64%, and NPL provision coverage rose to 218.8% from 159.3%.
  • Operating expenses declined, primarily due to lower employee and share-based compensation. 2018 also included RMB10.9 million of IPO expenses and RMB16.7 million net loss on loan sales.
  • Cash increased substantially, while equity rose following retained earnings and the IPO. Financing cash flow was nearly flat after large borrowing proceeds and repayments.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management said cash and anticipated financing cash flows should meet expected needs for at least 12 months. The filing gives no numeric earnings, revenue or origination guidance.
  • Management reported a significant increase in aggregate delinquency and NPL rates beginning in Q1 2019, attributing it to market changes, slower growth in outstanding principal, longer collections and a strategic focus on loan quality. The supplied text does not provide clear Q1 2019 rate values.
  • Regulatory uncertainty is central: historical credit enhancements may be viewed as unlicensed guarantees; trust funding and loan maturities can mismatch; and new asset-management rules may require lower structural leverage and revised funding or credit-strengthening arrangements. The company expects to work toward a maximum contractual structural leverage ratio of 3:1 by the end of 2020.
  • Funding is highly concentrated: trust plans accounted for 99.5% of originations, and FOTIC funded 84.1% of trust-model originations in 2018. A loss of key funding partners or tighter investor/funding access could materially affect operations.
  • Credit exposure is tied to property collateral, including a substantial second-lien component (58.1% of 2018 origination volume). Collections and foreclosure may take longer following cessation of a prior power-of-attorney collateral-disposal practice. As of year-end, 268 collection cases involving RMB181.4 million were pending; management said ordinary-course proceedings were not expected to have a material overall effect, but outcomes are uncertain.
  • Management and the auditor identified a material weakness in financial-reporting controls: insufficient U.S. GAAP/SEC-experienced accounting staff and inadequate communicated reporting policies. Management said remediation was underway; disclosure controls were assessed as ineffective at December 31, 2018. The audit opinion on the financial statements was unqualified; no auditor opinion on internal-control effectiveness was provided.
  • Other notable items include RMB125.5 million of operating lease commitments and expected recognition of approximately RMB121.0 million of lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption of the new lease standard in 2019. The company also disclosed potential PRC benefit-plan contribution shortfalls and substantial foreign-exchange, cash-remittance and regulatory risks.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Obtain subsequent-period delinquency, NPL, collections, charge-off and allowance data, and reconcile aggregate-rate measures with conventional delinquency and NPL ratios.
  2. Confirm the amount and availability of unrestricted cash, given that a large portion of reported cash is restricted to trust-fund lending activities; review near-term debt maturities and refinancing requirements.
  3. Assess the durability and economics of trust funding, FOTIC concentration, credit-strengthening obligations, repurchase arrangements and any maturity mismatches.
  4. Track regulatory developments and implementation of the 3:1 structural-leverage limit, licensing requirements and the company’s newer limited-partnership borrower-acquisition model.
  5. Review progress in remediating the material weakness and any later auditor or management assessment of internal controls.
  6. Consider PRC cash-repatriation restrictions, the company’s stated intention not to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, and the disclosed high probability of PFIC status for U.S. taxpayers.