FNB CORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2010

F.N.B. Corporation — Q2 2010 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010; compared with the corresponding 2009 periods unless otherwise noted. F.N.B. is a diversified financial services company focused on community banking, consumer finance, wealth management and insurance. Figures below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ2 2010Q2 2009Six months 2010Six months 2009
Net interest income$71.5$65.3$139.9$129.4
Non-interest income$28.4$28.5$58.7$56.6
Provision for loan losses$12.2$13.9$24.2$24.4
Non-interest expense$63.1$66.3$128.5$127.2
Net income$17.9$10.6$33.9$26.2
Net income available to common stockholders$17.9$9.1$33.9$23.4
Diluted earnings per common share$0.16$0.10$0.30$0.26
Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent basis3.81%3.60%3.77%3.62%
  • Balance sheet at June 30: Total assets were $8.83 billion, up from $8.71 billion at December 31, 2009. Loans were $5.97 billion, up 2.0%; deposits were $6.53 billion, up 2.4%; and stockholders’ equity was $1.06 billion, versus $1.04 billion at year-end.
  • Credit costs and asset quality: The allowance for loan losses was $114.0 million, or 1.91% of loans, compared with $104.7 million and 1.79% at year-end. Six-month net charge-offs were $14.8 million (0.51% annualized of average loans), down from $29.8 million (1.03%) in 2009. Non-performing assets rose to $177.3 million, or 2.01% of assets, from $171.7 million, or 1.97%, at year-end.
  • Cash flow: For the first six months, operating activities provided $80.5 million; investing activities used $267.1 million; and financing activities provided $76.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell $109.7 million to $200.9 million.
  • Debt and liquidity: At June 30, short-term borrowings were $735.4 million, long-term debt $205.8 million and junior subordinated debt $204.4 million. Deposits plus treasury management accounts totaled $7.14 billion, up $224.2 million from year-end. Management reported $3.1 billion of unused wholesale credit availability and stated that liquidity was sufficient for normal and contingency needs.
  • Capital: The company and its bank subsidiary were categorized as well-capitalized. F.N.B. Corporation’s total risk-based capital ratio was 12.8%, Tier 1 risk-based ratio 11.3%, and leverage ratio 8.6% at June 30. The common dividend was $0.12 per share per quarter.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Q2 net income increased 69% from Q2 2009; six-month net income increased 29%. The comparison of common earnings also reflects that preferred-stock dividends and discount amortization reduced 2009 common earnings; the Treasury CPP preferred stock had been redeemed in September 2009.
  • Net interest income improved as funding costs declined faster than asset yields. For Q2, the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities fell to 1.37% from 1.95%; management also cited growth in earning assets and a more favorable funding mix. Average earning-asset yield declined to 5.00% from 5.30%.
  • Q2 provision declined year over year, and charge-offs improved, particularly in Florida. However, management said the slow economic environment remained challenging, especially in Florida. Florida non-performing loans were 27.70% of that region’s loans, and the Florida allowance was $26.9 million, or 11.65% of regional loans.
  • Non-interest income was essentially flat in Q2. For the first half, it rose 3.7%, supported in part by $2.4 million of securities-sale gains and higher recoveries on previously acquired impaired loans. First-half non-interest expense increased 1.0%; a $2.3 million prepayment penalty on higher-cost FHLB advances contributed to other expense. The company prepaid $59 million of FHLB advances during the half.
  • The company recorded $2.3 million of credit-related securities impairment losses in earnings for the first half, including losses on pooled trust-preferred securities; a further $7.2 million of non-credit impairment was recognized in other comprehensive income. Management uses Level 3 estimates for certain illiquid trust-preferred securities and warned that further write-downs could be required if credit performance worsens.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • The filing gives no specific full-year earnings or revenue guidance and cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.
  • Management estimated Regulation E changes would reduce overdraft-fee revenue by about $1.7 million in the second half of 2010, potentially lowering earnings by $0.01 per share.
  • Management said annual appraisals for most Florida land-related loans were scheduled for Q4 2010 and that Florida land values had not stabilized. It had added $8.0 million to the Florida land-related allowance in 2010 and said further adjustments might be necessary.
  • Regulatory changes, including the Dodd-Frank Act signed July 21, 2010, may reduce revenue and increase expenses; the company was evaluating its response. Forward-looking results are also subject to economic conditions, competition, interest-rate sensitivity, and regulatory and legislative changes.
  • Legal proceedings were pending or threatened. The company did not expect aggregate liability to materially affect consolidated financial position based on information then available, but could not rule out a material effect on results in a future period.
  • Derivative counterparties may terminate positions or require collateral under specified default, capital-status or creditworthiness conditions. The company reported $17.6 million of collateral posted; an additional $11.6 million could be payable upon a breach, beyond collateral already posted.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether upcoming Florida land appraisals lead to additional loan-loss provision, charge-offs or OREO write-downs.
  • Trends in Florida and Pennsylvania non-performing loans, restructured loans and the adequacy of the $114.0 million allowance.
  • Performance and valuation assumptions for trust-preferred and other impaired securities, including the potential for further OTTI.
  • Actual impact of Regulation E and other regulatory changes on fee income, expenses and earnings.
  • Liquidity and collateral availability as pledged securities rose and cash declined, together with the terms and capacity of wholesale funding sources.