Intrepid Potash, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Intrepid Potash, Inc. — 2017 Q3 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period

Intrepid Potash is the only U.S. producer of muriate of potash and one of two U.S. producers of langbeinite, marketed as Trio®. Products are sold primarily into agricultural markets, with additional exposure to animal feed, industrial, oil and gas, water, and by-product markets. The filing covers the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with the corresponding 2016 periods.

Financial performance and key metrics

MetricQ3 2017Q3 20169M 20179M 2016
Sales$32.1 million$43.6 million$124.3 million$168.8 million
Gross margin (deficit)$3.8 million$(7.6) million$4.6 million$(22.2) million
Approximate gross margin percentage11.8%(17.5)%3.7%(13.2)%
Operating loss$(0.2) million$(14.6) million$(11.5) million$(41.6) million
Net loss$(1.9) million$(18.2) million$(21.5) million$(50.1) million
Loss per share$(0.02)$(0.24)$(0.19)$(0.66)
Operating cash flowNot separately provided for the quarter$14.1 million$(13.6) million
  • Potash sales volume declined 52% in the quarter and 49% year to date, while average net realized price increased to $232 per ton from $178 in Q3 2016 and to $236 per ton from $198 for the nine-month period.
  • Trio® sales volume increased 72% in the quarter and 65% year to date, but average net realized price fell to $187 per ton from $274 in Q3 2016 and to $197 per ton from $308 year to date.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $1.7 million at September 30, 2017, compared with $4.5 million at December 31, 2016. Total assets were $507.8 million and stockholders’ equity was $403.5 million.
  • Capital expenditures were $6.2 million for the first nine months. Management expected full-year 2017 capital investment of approximately $13 million to $17 million, primarily sustaining capital.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Results improved substantially because of lower production costs following the curtailment of conventional mining, greater use of solution mining, higher potash pricing, lower inventory write-downs, and increased by-product sales.
  • Lower potash volumes reflected the conversion of the East facility to Trio®-only production and the idling of the West facility in 2016.
  • Trio® sales increased as international volumes expanded, but international freight and lower pricing caused Trio® to generate a gross deficit of $1.2 million in Q3 and $6.7 million for the first nine months.
  • Lower-of-cost-or-market inventory charges declined to $0.7 million in Q3 and $4.8 million year to date, compared with $5.2 million and $17.1 million, respectively, in 2016.
  • Debt reduction was significant: senior notes declined to $60.0 million from $135.0 million at year-end 2016 after $75.0 million of principal repayments during the first nine months. Equity offerings provided approximately $59.1 million of net proceeds, primarily used to repay debt.
  • Common shares outstanding increased to 127.1 million at September 30, 2017, from 75.8 million at December 31, 2016, primarily reflecting the March public offering and subsequent at-the-market issuance.

Liquidity, debt, outlook, and risks

  • The company generated $14.1 million of operating cash flow in the first nine months, versus $13.6 million of operating cash use in the prior-year period. Financing cash use was $16.2 million, primarily due to debt repayments.
  • The $35 million asset-based revolving credit facility had no borrowings outstanding, $3.5 million of letters of credit, and $22.5 million of availability at September 30, 2017. Management stated that available facility capacity and expected operating cash flows were sufficient for the next twelve months.
  • The senior notes require an additional $10 million prepayment, plus accrued interest and a make-whole amount, by December 31, 2018. The company was in compliance with applicable debt covenants, including a $15 million minimum liquidity requirement; covenant liquidity was $24.2 million and covenant adjusted EBITDA was $19.4 million at September 30, 2017.
  • Interest rates on the senior notes were 7.73%, 8.63%, and 8.78% during the quarter and were scheduled to decline beginning November 1, 2017, to 3.73%, 4.63%, and 4.78%, respectively, assuming the applicable conditions remained satisfied.
  • Management expected a net loss for the full year ending December 31, 2017, based on anticipated potash and Trio® pricing. No specific revenue or earnings guidance was provided.
  • Management expected water sales of $20 million to $30 million in 2018 and reported pre-arranged water commitments of $15 million per year for each of the next five years, subject to demand, permits, water-rights challenges, and oil and gas activity.
  • Key risks include continued excess global potash capacity, fertilizer price and demand volatility, Trio® pricing pressure, weather-dependent solar production, production disruptions, environmental and mining regulation, permit and water-rights challenges, transportation costs, labor availability, liquidity and covenant compliance, and potential further inventory or asset write-downs.
  • The company is defending two Mosaic lawsuits alleging trade-secret and related violations. Damages are unspecified, and the company stated that potential losses cannot currently be reasonably estimated.
  • The company recorded a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets and increased the allowance by $10.2 million during the first nine months of 2017.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether potash pricing and selective higher-margin sales can offset structurally lower volumes.
  • Whether Trio® pricing stabilizes and whether international growth can become profitable after freight costs.
  • Progress toward the required additional $10 million senior-note prepayment and ongoing covenant compliance.
  • Cash generation, liquidity availability, and the company’s ability to fund planned capital expenditures while remaining loss-making.
  • Realization of the projected 2018 water-sales opportunity, including customer commitments, permits, and water-rights risks.
  • Potential exposure from the Mosaic litigation, reclamation obligations, surety bonds, and future regulatory requirements.