Transdigm Group INC annual report, FY2010

TransDigm Group Incorporated — Fiscal 2010 Form 10-K Summary

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The filing also provides unaudited fourth-quarter results for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. TransDigm designs, manufactures and supplies highly engineered proprietary aerospace components for commercial, business, regional and military aircraft.

Business context

  • More than 95% of fiscal 2010 sales were from proprietary products, approximately 80% from sole-source products, and approximately 60% from aftermarket sales.
  • Fiscal 2010 sales mix was approximately 40% commercial aftermarket, 23% commercial aerospace OEM, 34% defense and 3% non-aerospace.
  • Boeing, including Aviall, represented approximately 14% of sales; the ten largest customers represented approximately 48%.
  • Estimated backlog increased to $467 million from $402 million, although orders may be cancelled or deferred.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFiscal 2010Fiscal 2009Change
Net sales$827.7 million$761.6 million+8.7%
Gross profit$473.1 million$429.3 million+10.2%
Gross margin57.2%56.4%+0.8 percentage points
Operating income$363.1 million$335.4 million+8.2%
Operating margin43.9%44.1%-0.2 percentage points
Net income$163.4 million$162.9 million+0.3%
Net margin19.7%21.4%-1.7 percentage points
Basic and diluted EPS$2.52$3.10Declined due largely to the special dividend allocation
EBITDA$393.2 million$362.9 million+8.4%
EBITDA As Defined$411.6 million$374.7 million+9.9%

Fiscal 2010 fourth-quarter net sales were $223.1 million, gross profit was $132.4 million and net income was $50.6 million. Fourth-quarter basic and diluted EPS was $0.96.

  • Cash flow from operating activities was $197.3 million, essentially unchanged from $197.1 million in fiscal 2009.
  • Capital expenditures were $12.9 million, and acquisition spending was $166.6 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $176.6 million.
  • Cash and cash equivalents increased to $234.1 million from $190.2 million. Working capital was $470.5 million.
  • Total debt was $1.772 billion versus $1.357 billion in fiscal 2009. Debt represented approximately 74.9% of total capitalization, and the reported debt leverage ratio was approximately 4.3 times EBITDA As Defined.
  • The company had $198.0 million of available borrowing capacity under its $200 million revolving facility, subject to applicable conditions and covenants.
  • Fiscal 2011 capital expenditures were expected to be $15 million to $20 million.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Sales growth was driven primarily by acquisitions. Acquired businesses contributed approximately $73.8 million of fiscal 2010 sales, while organic sales declined approximately 1.0%, primarily because of lower commercial OEM demand.
  • Commercial aftermarket sales increased $6.2 million and defense sales increased $2.7 million, partially offsetting an $18.7 million decline in commercial OEM sales.
  • Gross margin improved because of product mix, pricing and cost reductions, despite acquisition-related costs and lower fixed-cost absorption on organic volume.
  • Selling and administrative expense increased 18.6% to $94.9 million, reflecting acquisition costs, $2.7 million of transaction-related expenses, higher research and development spending and professional fees.
  • Net interest expense increased 33.0% to $112.2 million, primarily because of the $425 million of 7.75% senior subordinated notes issued in October 2009.
  • Stockholders’ equity declined to $593.0 million from $819.2 million, principally because of the $404.9 million special dividend and related dividend-equivalent payments.

Acquisitions, outlook and unusual items

  • TransDigm acquired Semco Instruments for approximately $71 million in cash in September 2010 and acquired Dukes Aerospace for approximately $96 million in cash in December 2009. Fiscal 2010 acquisition spending also included other recently acquired businesses and product lines.
  • On September 25, 2010, the company agreed to acquire McKechnie Aerospace for approximately $1.265 billion in cash. Closing was subject to regulatory and other conditions, and the filing stated that completion was not assured.
  • Management intended to finance McKechnie and refinance part of existing debt with new senior subordinated notes and a new senior secured credit facility. The filing expected approximately $1.3 billion of additional debt if the acquisition closed.
  • Management stated that commercial aerospace conditions had begun to improve, with expected recovery in revenue passenger miles and commercial OEM production. Military-related sales were expected to be flat to modestly down from elevated levels.
  • Management believed internally generated funds and available revolver capacity would fund operations, capital expenditures, research and development and debt obligations through at least fiscal 2011, absent disruptive events.
  • The company paid a one-time special dividend of $7.65 per share, totaling approximately $374.6 million, funded substantially through the October 2009 notes offering. It did not anticipate regular cash dividends.

Principal risks and contingencies

  • High leverage, floating-rate debt, refinancing needs and restrictive covenants could constrain financial flexibility. A one-percentage-point increase in interest rates was estimated to increase annual interest expense by approximately $7.8 million on the term loans.
  • Commercial aftermarket demand depends on flight hours, revenue passenger miles, fleet size and age, and airline profitability. OEM demand is cyclical and sensitive to economic conditions.
  • Customer concentration, fixed-price contracts, limited minimum purchase commitments and possible order cancellations create revenue and margin risk.
  • Defense revenue depends on government budgets, procurement timing and geopolitical conditions. Government contracts may be terminated, repriced or audited.
  • Regulatory approvals, product certifications, export controls, product liability, environmental obligations, labor negotiations and supply-chain disruptions could adversely affect operations.
  • Goodwill of $1.572 billion and identifiable intangible assets of approximately $400.4 million represented a substantial portion of total assets and are subject to impairment risk.
  • The McKechnie transaction carried execution, integration, remediation and additional leverage risks, including potential liabilities associated with McKechnie environmental and legal matters.

Investor verification checklist

  • Verify whether the McKechnie acquisition closed and the amount and terms of debt ultimately raised to fund it.
  • Reconcile reported EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined to GAAP net income and operating cash flow; these are non-GAAP measures with significant adjustments.
  • Review debt maturities, refinancing progress, covenant compliance and the status of the $198 million revolving commitment.
  • Assess organic sales trends separately from acquisition-driven growth, particularly commercial OEM versus aftermarket demand.
  • Monitor customer concentration, backlog conversion and order cancellations or deferrals.
  • Evaluate goodwill, intangible assets and acquisition integration performance for impairment or margin pressure.
  • Review the special dividend’s effect on equity, leverage, EPS and future cash availability.