UNIVERSAL SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. annual report, FY2016

Universal Security Instruments, Inc. — FY2016 Form 10-K

Entity note: The filing is for Universal Security Instruments, Inc., not “Universal Safety Products, Inc.” as stated in the request metadata. It covers the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016; the filing also reports quarterly results, including the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Business context and reporting period

The company designs and markets smoke alarms, carbon monoxide alarms and related safety products, primarily through retail channels and its USI Electric subsidiary. It imports all products and sources most from its 50%-owned Hong Kong Joint Venture (HKJV), which manufactures in China. HKJV is accounted for using the equity method.

Financial results and liquidity

MetricFY2016FY2015
Net sales$13.74 million$9.89 million
Gross profit / margin$3.78 million / 27.5%$2.33 million / 23.5%
Operating loss$1.37 million$2.62 million
Net loss$2.14 million$3.70 million
Basic and diluted loss per share$(0.92)$(1.60)
Cash used in operating activities$822,957$1.37 million

Sales rose 38.9%, and the net loss narrowed 42.3%. Higher sales and gross margin reflected the introduction of sealed-battery alarms, which generally carry higher margins. SG&A rose to $4.48 million from $4.18 million, while R&D declined to $665,278 from $776,778. The company recorded a $741,846 equity-method loss from HKJV, down from $1.13 million.

At March 31, 2016, cash was $362,728, current assets were $6.59 million, current liabilities were $2.12 million, and working capital was $4.46 million, down $1.15 million year over year. The balance sheet showed $313,891 outstanding under the factoring line and $1.07 million payable to HKJV. The company reported approximately $3.34 million of combined unused availability under financing arrangements; factor advances are discretionary and secured by receivables and inventory. HKJV purchase terms include unsecured 90-day advances at 3.25% for specified sealed-battery products.

Fiscal 2016 investing activities provided $822,367, including $631,906 withdrawn from funds held by the factor and $190,461 in HKJV distributions. Financing activities provided $313,891. The filing does not provide a clear standalone EBITDA figure.

Quarter ended March 31, 2016

Fourth-quarter sales were $3.41 million, gross profit was $903,978, net loss was $775,241 and loss per share was $(0.34). In the comparable quarter of FY2015, sales were $2.78 million, gross profit was $840,771, net loss was $748,500 and loss per share was $(0.32).

Outlook, risks and notable matters

  • Management expects sales growth from sealed-battery alarms to continue and anticipates improved profitability as the product line expands. Additional sealed photoelectric models were still under development; the complete line was expected by the end of FY2017. These are expectations, not assured outcomes.
  • Management said cash flows and credit availability should fund operations for one year from the report’s issuance date if its plans succeed, but noted the company’s history of losses and limited financing sources. Plans include growing sealed-alarm sales, reducing payroll costs and seeking financing.
  • Product acceptance, continued weakness in the U.S. housing market, competition from larger companies, and reliance on Chinese imports and HKJV present material risks. Approximately 97% of FY2016 inventory purchases came from HKJV; loss of that supply relationship could materially harm operations.
  • Disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting were deemed ineffective due to a material weakness in oversight of HKJV accounting and disclosures. Management reported remediation of prior domestic control weaknesses, but the HKJV weakness remained under monitoring.
  • The company fully reserved its deferred tax assets because recent losses and uncertainty about future taxable income made realization uncertain. It reported approximately $7.53 million of net operating loss carryforwards, subject to expiration and limitations.
  • Routine legal matters were not expected by management to have a material adverse effect. The CEO agreement may require post-employment payments ranging from approximately $94,000 to $1.995 million under specified events. Related-party charges of about $493,000 were made to the CEO’s and family members’ credit cards during FY2016 and reimbursed; $66,884 was outstanding at year-end.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether sealed-alarm sales and margins continued to grow, and whether the remaining product approvals and launches occurred as planned.
  • Current cash burn, working capital, factoring availability and the terms or continued availability of discretionary credit advances.
  • Progress in addressing HKJV’s material control weakness and any subsequent changes to the company’s control assessment.
  • HKJV’s financial performance and the company’s continued concentration of sourcing and inventory purchases with that venture.
  • Whether operating results support realization of tax attributes and the company’s stated ability to fund operations for the following twelve months.