ARROW FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2016

Arrow Financial Corporation — Q1 2016 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2016; balance-sheet figures are as of March 31, 2016. Unaudited. Amounts below are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted.

Business context and financial performance

Arrow is a New York-based bank holding company operating two banks and insurance, investment-advisory, and other subsidiaries. It reported net income of $6.55 million and diluted EPS of $0.50, compared with $5.86 million and $0.45 in Q1 2015.

MetricQ1 2016Q1 2015Change
Interest and dividend income$18.63$16.99Up 9.6%
Net interest income, GAAP$17.36$15.90Up 9.2%
Net interest income, tax-equivalent$18.48$16.99Up 8.8%
Provision for loan losses$0.40$0.28Up $0.13
Noninterest income$6.88$6.86Nearly flat
Noninterest expense$14.37$13.96Up 3.0%
Net income$6.55$5.86Up 11.9%

Return on average assets was 1.07% versus 1.06%; return on average equity was 12.07% versus 11.72%. Tax-equivalent net interest margin declined to 3.19% from 3.24%, while the efficiency ratio improved to 56.37% from 58.37%. The effective tax rate was 30.8%, compared with 31.4%.

Balance sheet, cash flow, and capital

  • Total assets were $2.479 billion, up 6.1% year over year and 1.3% from year-end 2015. Loans were $1.623 billion, up 13.1% year over year and 3.1% during the quarter.
  • Deposits totaled $2.115 billion, up 4.8% year over year and 4.2% from year-end. Management attributed much of the quarterly increase to seasonal municipal deposits; municipal balances were 34.8% of deposits at quarter-end.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $60.7 million. Q1 operating cash flow was $10.5 million; investing activities used $22.8 million and financing activities provided $22.0 million, producing a $9.6 million increase in cash and equivalents.
  • Period-end borrowings included $45.2 million of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements, $55.0 million of FHLB term advances, and $20.0 million of junior subordinated obligations. No FHLB overnight advances remained outstanding, compared with $82.0 million at December 31, 2015.
  • Stockholders’ equity was $220.7 million. The company reported estimated holding-company capital ratios of 12.84% CET1, 14.08% Tier 1 risk-based, 15.09% total risk-based, and 9.36% Tier 1 leverage; management said the company and both banks were well-capitalized.
  • Liquidity resources included approximately $256.6 million of unused FHLB borrowing capacity and $330.6 million available through Federal Reserve discount-window facilities. Management reported a basic liquidity ratio of 11.1% of assets, above its 4% internal minimum target.

Material changes and credit quality

Loan growth was broad-based, led by consumer loans (up 5.4% from year-end), commercial real estate (up 4.9%), and commercial loans (up 3.4%); residential real estate loans rose 0.2%. Average earning assets increased 9.7% year over year, supporting higher net interest income despite margin compression. The margin decline reflected lower asset yields and increased FHLB term borrowing costs. Salaries and benefits rose 5.6%, partly reflecting higher pension, profit-sharing, and medical costs; staffing fell by seven full-time-equivalent employees.

The allowance for loan losses was $16.3 million, or 1.00% of loans, versus 1.09% a year earlier. Net charge-offs were $0.15 million, or 0.04% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared with $0.22 million and 0.06%. Nonperforming loans rose to $8.1 million from $6.9 million at year-end; nonperforming assets were $10.1 million, up 13.5% from year-end. Management attributed the increase primarily to one commercial loan placed on nonaccrual status.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management noted that margin compression may continue and that, in a rising-rate environment, funding costs could initially rise faster than asset yields. Its modeled scenarios estimated net interest income decreases of 2.42% under a 200-basis-point rate increase and 1.21% under an adjusted 100-basis-point decrease; these are simulations, not forecasts.
  • Management described regional economic conditions as generally stable, while identifying potential weakness in the local economy, loan demand, and commercial real estate or consumer credit quality as risks. Municipal-deposit competition and seasonality, interest-rate changes, and cybersecurity, regulatory, and competitive risks were also noted.
  • The company reported no material pending legal proceedings. It continued to disclose indirect contingent exposure related to Visa litigation, but management believed Visa’s escrow was sufficient; the company assigned no economic value to its Visa Class B shares.
  • No other-than-temporary impairment losses were recorded on securities in Q1. Management considered unrealized securities losses temporary and said it did not intend, nor expect to be required, to sell the affected securities before recovery.
  • Arrow sold its Loomis & LaPann sports-insurance business in October 2015 and expected post-closing cash payments during 2016–2018. No material Q1 securities gains were recorded, compared with a $90,000 gain in Q1 2015.

Investor verification points

  • Review whether loan growth and deposit increases—particularly seasonal municipal balances—persist in subsequent quarters.
  • Track net interest margin, funding costs, and the sensitivity of earnings to rate changes.
  • Monitor the commercial loan newly placed on nonaccrual, nonperforming loans, and the allowance relative to portfolio growth.
  • Confirm regulatory capital and liquidity capacity as balance-sheet growth and funding needs evolve.
  • Check subsequent filings for the timing and amount of Loomis sale proceeds, Visa litigation developments, and any changes to dividends or the authorized share-repurchase program.