Aterian, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2019

Business context and reporting period

The filing is Mohawk Group Holdings, Inc.’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2019. The filing describes a technology-enabled consumer-products business using its AIMEE platform to select, market and sell products, primarily through online marketplaces. Although the request metadata identifies Aterian, the filing itself names Mohawk Group Holdings, Inc. (ticker MWK).

Financial performance and liquidity

Amounts below are in millions of dollars unless otherwise stated.

MetricThree months ended June 30, 2019Six months ended June 30, 2019
Revenue$30.4; up 108.2% year over year$48.2; up 66.8% year over year
Gross profit / margin$11.8 / 38.7%, versus $3.8 / 25.9% in 2018$18.4 / 38.2%, versus $7.2 / 25.1% in 2018
Operating loss$(6.3), versus $(8.4) in 2018$(13.5), versus $(17.1) in 2018
Net loss$(7.6), or $(0.62) per share, versus $(8.9), or $(0.90) per share$(16.0), or $(1.35) per share, versus $(18.1), or $(1.95) per share
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)$(3.7), versus $(8.2) in 2018$(9.3), versus $(16.6) in 2018

Six-month operating cash use was $16.3, compared with $17.8 in 2018. Investing activities used $0.02; financing activities provided $35.6. Cash and restricted cash ended the period at $40.0, including unrestricted cash of $39.5. Current assets were $81.0 and current liabilities $45.0.

At June 30, borrowings were $20.4 under the revolving credit facility and $15.0 under the Horizon term loan ($35.4 principal in total; $31.9 carrying amount after debt discounts and issuance costs). Available revolving capacity was approximately $1.1. Stockholders’ equity was $23.1. The company reported compliance with its debt covenants.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Revenue growth was driven chiefly by direct sales, which rose 123.2% in the quarter and 83.7% in the six-month period. Environmental appliances were the largest product category; cosmetics, skincare and supplements also contributed significant new revenue. Wholesale revenue declined.
  • Gross margin improved substantially, which management attributed to a higher direct-sales mix, better product unit economics and growth in managed SaaS revenue.
  • Operating and net losses narrowed despite higher sales, while interest expense increased to $1.3 for the quarter and $2.5 for six months, reflecting increased borrowing and the Horizon loan.
  • The June IPO issued 3.6 million shares at $10 per share and generated approximately $29.6 net proceeds. Shares outstanding at June 30 were 17.6 million, compared with 11.5 million at year-end 2018.
  • Six-month stock-based compensation rose to $4.1 from $0.3 in 2018. The filing anticipates materially higher quarterly expense from restricted-stock awards beginning in Q3.

Outlook, risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Liquidity outlook: Management said the IPO proceeds, current sales and expense projections, and credit facility were expected to fund estimated liquidity needs for the twelve months following issuance; it stated that historical going-concern substantial doubt had been mitigated. This is not a profitability forecast, and the company continued to incur operating losses and operating cash outflows.
  • Costs and operating model: Management expected R&D expense and interest expense to rise, and described anticipated sales-and-distribution efficiencies from automation and fulfillment optimization. It cautioned that savings could vary with seasonality and product mix. No specific revenue or earnings guidance was provided.
  • Tariffs and seasonality: Most products are manufactured in China, and tariffs could increase product costs. Management planned to raise prices to offset tariff effects but warned this could reduce customer orders. Environmental appliances tend to be seasonal in summer; kitchen products tend to peak in the fourth quarter.
  • Recall and regulatory exposure: The Xtava Allure hair-dryer recall had an estimated remaining liability of $1.5. A possible CPSC late-reporting penalty could be material, but the company said it could not reasonably estimate any penalty. The company also reported a California Energy Commission notice concerning certain products’ appliance-database listings and possible compliance penalties or sales restrictions.
  • Controls: Management concluded disclosure controls were not effective at June 30 because previously identified material weaknesses remained, including weaknesses in segregation of duties, account reconciliations, journal-entry review and review of complex accounting matters. Remediation was ongoing.
  • Acquisitions: Two earlier non-binding acquisition proposals were terminated. A July 21, 2019 non-binding term sheet proposed acquiring a personal-health business for $1.3 cash plus a $0.2 promissory note; completion was uncertain and subject to diligence, definitive documentation and approvals.
  • Other key risks: Sales are highly concentrated on Amazon; the company depends on third-party marketplace data and platforms, suppliers and logistics providers, and effective inventory management. It also cited cybersecurity, product-safety, customer-return, financing and dilution risks. No material legal proceeding was reported, but ordinary-course claims remain possible.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether revenue growth and gross-margin gains persist across seasons and product categories, and whether the business can reach positive operating cash flow.
  • Cash burn, actual borrowing availability, debt covenant headroom and interest costs; distinguish the $35.4 principal balance from the $31.9 carrying amount.
  • Execution of internal-control remediation and any subsequent change in the effectiveness conclusion.
  • Final CPSC outcome and recall spending, and resolution of the California Energy Commission product-listing matter.
  • Tariff developments, price increases and their effects on demand and margins; dependence on Amazon and China-based manufacturing.
  • Expected stock-based compensation, future share issuance and lock-up expirations, as well as whether the proposed acquisition closes and performs as expected.