SIERRA BANCORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2018

Sierra Bancorp — Q3 2018 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2018; unaudited. Sierra Bancorp is the holding company for Bank of the Sierra, a California community bank serving the South San Joaquin Valley, Central Coast, and neighboring areas. Unless otherwise stated, amounts below are in millions of dollars.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2018Q3 2017Nine months 2018Nine months 2017
Net interest income$23.776$18.435$68.336$53.159
Provision for loan losses$2.450$0$2.950$0.300
Non-interest income$5.723$5.910$16.285$16.408
Non-interest expense$17.807$15.445$52.988$46.238
Net income$7.071$5.742$21.773$15.496
Diluted EPS$0.46$0.41$1.41$1.11
  • Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, was 4.27% for Q3 versus 3.97% a year earlier, and 4.24% for the nine months versus 3.93%. Q3 return on average assets/equity was 1.15%/10.66%; nine-month figures were 1.22%/11.23%.
  • At September 30, assets were $2.463 billion, up from $2.340 billion at year-end 2017. Gross loans were $1.695 billion, up 9% from year-end; deposits were $2.106 billion, up 6%. Shareholders’ equity was $263.2 million, versus $255.9 million at year-end.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $65.0 million. For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $25.1 million, investing cash flow was negative $143.8 million, and financing cash flow was positive $113.7 million.
  • Period-end borrowings included $16.1 million of short-term borrowings, $16.5 million of repurchase agreements, and $34.7 million of subordinated debentures. The filing reports $519 million of available correspondent-bank and FHLB credit lines, plus potential additional FHLB and Federal Reserve borrowing capacity subject to collateral and other conditions.
  • The consolidated total risk-based capital ratio was 14.86% (15.32% at year-end); the leverage ratio was 11.40%. Management said the Company and Bank remained well capitalized and above applicable “well capitalized” thresholds.

Changes versus comparable periods

  • Net income increased 23% for Q3 and 41% for the first nine months. Growth in net interest income reflected larger average earning assets, including the Ojai acquisition, loan growth, and improved loan yields; net interest margin rose 30 basis points in Q3 and 31 basis points year to date.
  • Q3 pre-tax income rose about 4%, while the effective tax rate fell to 23.5% from 35.5%, primarily reflecting the lower federal corporate tax rate. The nine-month tax rate was 24.1% versus 32.7%.
  • Non-interest expense rose 15% in both comparisons, largely from acquired operations, branch expansion, staffing, and operating costs. Non-interest income declined slightly, partly because Q3 2017 included $918,000 of securities gains that did not recur.
  • Loan growth was concentrated in real estate and agricultural production lending; mortgage warehouse balances declined $44 million, or 32%, from year-end. The loan portfolio was 82.9% real estate at September 30.
  • The available-for-sale securities portfolio’s net unrealized loss widened to $15.0 million from $3.3 million at year-end, primarily due to rising interest rates. The resulting after-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss increased by $8.2 million.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • No formal earnings or financial guidance is provided. Management cited a record loan pipeline in recent periods but cautioned that prepayments and mortgage warehouse fluctuations make future aggregate loan growth uncertain.
  • Credit quality weakened on reported measures: nonperforming assets were $13.2 million, or 0.78% of gross loans plus foreclosed assets, versus $9.4 million and 0.60% at year-end. Nonperforming loans included a $10 million commercial real estate participation placed on non-accrual; approximately $2 million was reserved and $2 million charged off in August.
  • After quarter-end, the collateral property for that participation was conveyed to the lead bank. In mid-October, Sierra transferred its remaining approximately $8 million participation from loans to other real estate owned at approximate fair value. Management said the transfer did not change total nonperforming assets.
  • The allowance for loan and lease losses was $9.463 million, 0.56% of gross loans; coverage of nonperforming loans was 86.34%, down from 228.19% at year-end. Management considers the allowance adequate but warns that losses could exceed it.
  • CECL is scheduled for adoption January 1, 2020. Preliminary work indicates it may materially affect the allowance and equity; initial estimates suggest the allowance could increase by 100% or more under a discounted-cash-flow approach with forecasting. The amount remains undetermined.
  • Interest-rate simulations show projected 12-month net interest income up 0.57% for an immediate +100 bp shock, but down 4.67% for −100 bp and 10.57% for −200 bp. Management noted that declines of 200 bp or more exceed internal policy guidelines; no corrective action was then planned. Sensitivity depends on assumptions, particularly deposit behavior and rates.
  • Other risks identified include local economic conditions, credit losses, deposit competition and runoff, interest-rate changes, liquidity, securities valuation, acquisitions and branch expansion, staffing, technology, and regulation. Unused commitments to extend credit totaled $772 million; standby letters of credit totaled $10.4 million. The company stated that not all commitments are expected to be drawn.
  • Management reported no material change in risk factors from its 2017 Form 10-K, no material adverse effect expected from ordinary-course legal proceedings, and no significant third-quarter change in internal controls. The filing does not provide a clear quantified forecast for future earnings or loan-loss provisions.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Track resolution, recovery, and any further charge-offs associated with the $10 million loan participation and the subsequent $8 million OREO transfer.
  • Review subsequent nonperforming-loan trends, charge-offs, allowance coverage, and the concentration of lending in real estate.
  • Monitor deposit retention, wholesale and brokered funding, funding costs, and the capacity and collateral conditions for available borrowing lines.
  • Assess the impact of rate changes on net interest income, securities values, and deposit pricing, including the model assumptions behind sensitivity estimates.
  • Follow CECL implementation estimates and the eventual effect on the allowance, retained earnings, and regulatory capital.
  • Distinguish recurring earnings from acquisition and branch costs, OREO gains, securities gains, and tax-rate effects when assessing the reported profit increase.