SIERRA BANCORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2014

Sierra Bancorp — Q1 2014 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2014; balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2013. Sierra Bancorp is a California bank holding company operating Bank of the Sierra, serving communities in the San Joaquin Valley. Monetary amounts below are U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance

MetricQ1 2014Comparable period / change
Net interest income$12.215 million$11.847 million, up 3%
Net interest margin, tax-equivalent4.00%3.97%, up 3 basis points
Net income$3.799 million$2.334 million, up 63%
Basic / diluted EPS$0.27 / $0.26$0.17 / $0.16
Return on average assets / equity, annualized1.09% / 8.36%0.68% / 5.42%
Non-interest income$3.707 million$4.110 million, down 10%
Non-interest expense$10.729 million$11.819 million, down 9%
Loan-loss provision$150,000$1.600 million
Net cash from operating activities$4.782 million$5.871 million

Combined net interest and non-interest income was $15.922 million, slightly below $15.957 million a year earlier. The earnings increase was driven chiefly by a $1.450 million lower loan-loss provision and lower expenses, including a $1.210 million year-over-year swing in net gains/losses on foreclosed-asset sales. The efficiency ratio increased to 70.06% from 68.62%. The income-tax provision was $1.244 million, or 25% of pretax income, versus $204,000, or 8%; management cited higher taxable income relative to available credits and California tax-law changes.

Financial position, credit, debt and liquidity

  • Total assets were $1.458 billion, up 3% from year-end. Gross loans rose 4% to $837.8 million, including a $33 million purchase of residential mortgage loans; available-for-sale securities increased 5% to $444.8 million.
  • Deposits grew 4% to $1.220 billion. Core non-maturity deposits increased $56 million, which management said was largely seasonal; approximately $40 million shifted from non-interest-bearing to interest-bearing transaction accounts during a core-system conversion.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $72.2 million, down from $78.0 million at year-end. Investing activities used $54.2 million, principally reflecting net loan growth and securities activity; financing activities provided $43.5 million, chiefly from deposit growth. Operating activities provided $4.8 million.
  • Borrowings included $30.9 million of junior subordinated debentures and $5.5 million of repurchase agreements. There were no short- or long-term borrowings outstanding. Total liabilities were $1.274 billion and shareholders’ equity was $184.2 million.
  • Nonperforming assets declined to $43.4 million from $45.6 million; nonperforming loans were $36.2 million and foreclosed assets $7.2 million. Nonperforming assets were 5.14% of gross loans plus foreclosed assets, versus 5.62% at year-end. Allowance for loan and lease losses was $11.5 million, 1.37% of gross loans and 31.74% of nonperforming loans.
  • Total TDRs were $39.3 million, of which $24.1 million were on non-accrual status. Unused credit commitments were $425.0 million; standby and commercial letters of credit totaled $16.8 million.
  • Management reported $209 million available on existing credit lines, with additional potential FHLB and Federal Reserve capacity subject to collateral and other conditions. Unpledged or excess-pledged securities totaled $346 million. Management considered liquidity adequate for current and anticipated short-term needs.
  • Consolidated regulatory capital ratios were 20.96% total risk-based, 19.74% Tier 1 risk-based and 14.26% Tier 1 leverage; all declined from year-end. The company and bank remained “well capitalized.”

Changes, outlook and risks

  • Management attributed higher net interest income to more earning assets, lower deposit costs and a modest margin increase; competitive pressure on loan yields and a shift toward lower-yielding investments partly offset these effects.
  • The quarter included a $723,000 net gain on foreclosed-asset sales, compared with a $487,000 net loss in Q1 2013. Lower deposit-service charges and bank-owned life-insurance income reduced non-interest income. Marketing and data-processing costs increased amid rebranding and core-system conversion work; management expected related data-processing costs and network-upgrade depreciation to rise further.
  • No specific earnings or financial guidance was provided. Management’s preliminary view was that it could absorb regulatory capital-rule changes effective beginning in 2015 without constraining organic growth, while cautioning that this was not assured.
  • Interest-rate modeling showed an asset-sensitive profile: an immediate 100-basis-point increase was estimated to raise 12-month net interest income 3.01%; a 100-basis-point decline was estimated to reduce it 9.86%. Declining-rate scenarios exceeded the company’s internal sensitivity limits. Management considered a significant rate decline unlikely but said it would continue monitoring exposure.
  • Disclosed risks include economic weakness in the service area, agricultural and other credit conditions, higher nonperforming assets and credit losses, interest-rate and liquidity risks, securities-value declines, difficulty selling foreclosed property, regulatory changes, and execution risks involving staffing, technology and branch expansion. Management said there were no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors. Routine legal proceedings were not expected by management to have a material adverse effect.
  • The filing reported no significant changes in internal controls and concluded disclosure controls were adequate and effective. The company repurchased 78,640 shares in March at an average $16.02 per share; $1.5 million of repurchases affected quarter-end equity.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth and deposit growth persist after the mortgage purchase and seasonal deposit inflows, including the effect of account transfers during the core-system conversion.
  • Credit trends underlying the $39.3 million TDR balance, $36.2 million of nonperforming loans, collateral valuations and the adequacy of the $11.5 million allowance.
  • How much of the earnings improvement reflects sustainable operations versus the sharply lower provision and unusual foreclosed-asset sale gains; also monitor expense increases tied to rebranding and technology projects.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity assumptions and management’s response to modeled downside scenarios that exceed internal limits.
  • Capital-ratio trajectory and the eventual effects of 2015 regulatory capital rules; confirm liquidity capacity remains available subject to collateral requirements.