CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Civista Bancshares, Inc. — Q3 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Balance-sheet comparisons are against December 31, 2016. Civista is an Ohio-based financial holding company operating primarily through its community bank. Dollar figures below are in thousands unless stated otherwise; interim financial statements are unaudited.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016Nine months 2017Nine months 2016
Net interest income$13,680$12,526$39,939$37,701
Provision (credit) for loan losses$0$0$0$(1,300)
Noninterest income$3,465$3,653$12,704$12,989
Noninterest expense$12,167$11,195$36,217$33,153
Net income$3,660$3,680$11,892$13,586
Net income available to common shareholders$3,352$3,306$10,957$12,430
Basic / diluted EPS$0.33 / $0.29$0.41 / $0.34$1.12 / $0.97$1.57 / $1.24
Net interest margin4.08%4.06%3.93%3.89%
  • Scale and lending: Assets were $1,496,088, up 8.6% from year-end 2016. Total loans were $1,141,992 and net loans were $1,129,046; net loans rose 8.3% year to date. The net loan-to-deposit ratio was 94.0%, versus 93.0% at year-end.
  • Deposits and funding: Deposits totaled $1,201,289, up $80,186. Noninterest-bearing deposits were $357,539; interest-bearing deposits were $843,750. FHLB advances were $56,750, repurchase agreements were $15,148, and subordinated debentures were $29,427. Total liabilities were $1,314,107.
  • Capital: Shareholders’ equity was $181,981, or 12.2% of assets, compared with $137,616, or 10.0%, at year-end. September 30 capital ratios were 16.6% total risk-based, 15.5% Tier 1 risk-based, 11.6% CET1, and 12.7% leverage; each exceeded the stated regulatory minimums.
  • Cash flow: For the nine months, operating cash flow was $11,821, investing cash flow was $(119,937), and financing cash flow was $104,815. Cash and due from financial institutions declined $3,301 to $33,394. Investing outflows principally reflected net loan originations of $86,678 and securities purchases of $57,005.
  • Credit quality: The allowance for loan losses was $12,946, or 1.13% of loans, versus $13,305, or 1.26%, at year-end. No provision was recorded in the first nine months of 2017; net charge-offs were $359, compared with net recoveries of $390 in 2016. Nonaccrual loans were $7,532, up from $6,943; total loans past due were $4,205, down from $6,111.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 net interest income increased $1,154 year over year, supported by higher average earning assets and a 2-basis-point increase in reported net interest margin. Interest expense increased $312.
  • Q3 net income declined $20, while diluted EPS fell from $0.34 to $0.29. For the nine months, net income fell $1,694 and diluted EPS declined from $1.24 to $0.97. The 2016 year-to-date comparison included a $1,300 loan-loss provision credit following recovery of a previously charged-down loan.
  • Year-to-date noninterest expense rose $3,064, including higher salaries and benefits (up $2,631), professional services (up $268), and ATM expense (up $321). Management attributed payroll growth partly to increased staffing; FTEs were 347 for the nine-month period versus the comparable prior period, and 353.7 in Q3 versus the prior-year quarter.
  • Year-to-date noninterest income declined $285. Lower service charges, loan-sale gains, and other income were partly offset by higher wealth management fees. Tax refund processing fees were $2,750 in both nine-month periods and are seasonal.
  • Common equity proceeds of $32,821 from a February 2017 public offering contributed to higher capital and securities balances. Common shares outstanding increased to 10,170,935 at September 30, from 8,343,509 at year-end. The offering and preferred-share conversions increased the share base, relevant to per-share comparisons.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management says the temporary increase in noninterest-bearing deposits associated with tax refund processing was expected to return toward year-end levels over the following quarter.
  • Management identifies interest-rate and liquidity risk, credit risk, real estate market and local economic conditions, regulatory and tax changes, and information-system failures among factors that could affect results. Two loan concentrations were lessors of nonresidential buildings and dwellings ($284,218, or 24.8% of loans) and lessors of residential buildings and dwellings ($155,616, or 13.6%); repayment depends in part on real estate and local economic conditions.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity modeling showed net portfolio value increasing 10% under a +100-basis-point shock and 15% under +200 basis points, while declining 1% under a -100-basis-point shock. These are model estimates, not forecasts.
  • Available-for-sale securities totaled $229,419. Unrealized losses of $668 were attributed mainly to higher market yields; management said it intended and was able to hold affected securities and did not expect to sell them before recovery.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments included $304,258 of variable-rate and $8,672 of fixed-rate commitments to extend credit, including lines, construction loans, overdraft protection, and letters of credit. Management did not anticipate material losses, but commitments carry potential credit exposure.
  • Available FHLB borrowing capacity was reported at approximately $279,017; the bank also had $42,500 in correspondent federal-funds lines and the holding company had a $7,500 credit line. The filing reports no new material legal proceedings, material changes to risk factors, or material changes in internal control during the quarter.
  • Management expects the future credit-loss standard (CECL) to require a one-time cumulative adjustment to the allowance when adopted, but could not yet estimate its amount or overall impact. No goodwill impairment was reported; goodwill was $27,095.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether loan growth and the 94.0% net loan-to-deposit ratio remain supported by stable deposit funding, particularly given the reported increase in brokered deposits and short-term tax-processing balances.
  2. Whether the allowance remains adequate as nonaccrual loans rose and the loan portfolio is concentrated in real estate-related lending; review subsequent delinquency, charge-off, and reserve trends.
  3. Whether expense growth—especially staffing, compensation, ATM, and professional-services costs—can be absorbed by recurring revenue and sustained net interest income.
  4. How the common-stock offering and preferred-share conversions affect future diluted EPS, capital ratios, and shareholder returns.
  5. The eventual CECL adoption impact and any changes to the value or liquidity of the securities portfolio under different interest-rate conditions.