H2O AMERICA quarterly report, Q2 FY2014

Filing summary: SJW Corp. Form 10-Q, quarter ended June 30, 2014

Entity note: The request identifies H2O America, but the supplied filing is for SJW Corp. and its subsidiaries. The figures below summarize the filing as provided; confirm the intended registrant.

Business context and reporting period

SJW Corp. operates regulated water utilities in California and Texas, alongside nonregulated water-related activities and commercial real estate. This unaudited filing covers the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. Water sales are seasonal, so interim results may not represent full-year performance. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless noted.

Financial results and liquidity

MetricQ2 2014Q2 2013Six months 2014Six months 2013
Operating revenue$70.4$74.2$125.0$124.4
Operating income$12.1$16.9$18.2$22.7
Net income$6.8$7.4$7.8$8.8
Diluted EPS$0.34$0.37$0.38$0.45
Operating margin17.2%22.8%14.5%18.3%
Net margin9.7%10.0%6.2%7.0%
  • Q2 revenue fell 5.2%; first-half revenue rose 0.5%. Q2 net income declined 8%, and first-half net income declined 11% year over year.
  • First-half operating cash flow was $25.0, versus $27.0 a year earlier. Investing used $46.7, including $48.2 of company-funded utility-plant additions. Financing provided $25.4; cash ended the period at $6.0, up from $2.3 at year-end 2013.
  • At June 30, cash was $6.0 and current assets were $47.0 versus current liabilities of $92.1. The company reported $52.0 drawn on its line of credit, $334.7 of long-term debt and $0.6 of current long-term debt. It reported $44.8 of unused short-term credit capacity and compliance with applicable covenants.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $321.5. The quarterly dividend was $0.19 per share; a $0.1875-per-share dividend was declared July 30 for payment in September.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Management attributed weaker earnings chiefly to drought-related lower water use and a shift from less costly surface water to groundwater, purchased water and higher-cost energy. Q2 water-utility revenue fell $4.5; the filing attributes an $8.0 reduction to consumption changes, partly offset by rate increases and other items.
  • First-half water production expense rose $5.8, while administrative and general expense fell $2.6, largely reflecting prior-year Texas project costs and lower pension expense. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.4.
  • Results included a $2.0 pretax gain on sale of California Water Service Group shares and a $0.3 pretax gain on sale of a Texas property. The company also recorded $0.9 of California enterprise-zone sales and use tax credits related to 2008–2012. The stock sale generated a $1.2 after-tax gain.
  • The California Water Service Group holding was valued at $6.3 at quarter-end, down from $8.9 at year-end; 125,969 shares were sold during Q2, leaving 259,151 shares.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • California was experiencing a record drought. The local wholesaler targeted 20% water-use reduction and reduced treated-water deliveries to 80% of monthly contract allocations through year-end. San Jose Water Company said its available potable sources should meet customer demand through the remainder of 2014. Regulated usage was down 16% in April and 9% in May versus the same months in 2013.
  • Management budgeted $88.6 of 2014 Water Utility Services capital expenditures, excluding customer-funded work; $48.2, or 54%, had been spent by June 30. It projected approximately $527 of capital expenditures over five years, subject to regulatory approval, including $60.5 for the Montevina treatment plant.
  • A CPUC proposed decision issued July 11 recommended lower rate increases than San Jose Water Company had requested; it was not final, and a final decision was expected in Q3 2014. A $9.4 revenue increase to offset wholesale water-cost increases took effect July 1. Drought conservation revenue and cost memorandum accounts are subject to recovery-recognition requirements.
  • Texas utility rate increases were subject to potential adjustment or refund for some customers while proceedings continued. Management said a refund was not probable at the time and did not expect the final decision to materially affect the company.
  • Other exposures include water-supply cost and availability, regulatory recovery and rate-case timing, variable-rate borrowing, pension assumptions and investment values, and equity-price changes. The filing reported no pending litigation expected to have a material effect and no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors.
  • After quarter-end, the company expected to close a $50.0, 5.14% unsecured 30-year senior-note issuance on August 7. The filing also disclosed a July 30 amendment extending the CEO’s employment term through 2017 and providing for higher base salary and equity awards.

Investor facts to verify

  • Confirm that SJW Corp., rather than H2O America, is the intended company for this summary.
  • Check the final CPUC general-rate-case decision and the collection or refund treatment of interim rates and conservation memorandum accounts.
  • Track drought conditions, conservation-driven demand, water-source mix and the resulting production costs.
  • Assess funding needs and regulatory approval for the capital program, and monitor line-of-credit use and the planned senior-note issuance.
  • Evaluate the Texas rate-case refund exposure and whether reported gains, tax credits and asset sales are recurring; they supported reported-period earnings.