IMMUCELL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2018

ImmuCell Corporation — Q1 2018 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2018; financial statements are unaudited. ImmuCell develops and sells animal-health products for dairy and beef cattle, principally the First Defense product line, and is developing a Nisin-based mastitis treatment.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ1 2018Q1 2017
Product sales$2.88 million$3.54 million
Gross profit / margin$1.36 million / 47%$2.15 million / 61%
Operating income (loss)$(178,000)$918,000
Net income (loss)$(221,000); $(0.04) per share$584,000; $0.12 per diluted share
Net cash from operating activities$250,000$1.26 million
Capital expenditures$1.21 million$4.93 million

At March 31, cash and cash equivalents were $3.06 million, working capital was approximately $4.99 million, and total assets were $33.63 million. Bank debt was approximately $9.19 million, net of debt issuance costs; no amount was drawn on the separate $500,000 line of credit. A bank covenant requires at least $2.0 million of qualifying cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The company reported compliance with its covenants.

Material changes and operating performance

  • Sales fell 19% year over year. Domestic sales declined 7%; international sales declined 62%. First Defense represented 97% of sales, compared with 92% a year earlier.
  • Management attributed lower shipments and higher unit costs mainly to production constraints and biological-yield variability, including difficulty scaling production of the new Tri-Shield product. Gross margin contracted to 47% from 61%.
  • Product development expense increased 72% to $583,000, primarily as the company invested in regulatory approval and launch work for new products. Other expenses, net, rose to $92,000 from $30,000, largely reflecting higher interest expense.
  • Order backlog was approximately $1.245 million at quarter-end: about $344,000 for Tri-Shield and $901,000 for other First Defense formats. Management expected to fulfill the Tri-Shield backlog over the following nine months and the other-format backlog during Q2. By May 11, the latter backlog had fallen approximately 41%, to about $536,000.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • Management said it had sufficient capital to continue operations for at least 12 months from the filing date. Cash declined by $738,000 during the quarter, with operating cash inflows offset by investment in the Nisin facility.
  • The Nisin facility was estimated to cost approximately $21 million; about $20.5 million had been incurred by March 31, with roughly $550,000 expected to be paid afterward. Equipment installation and qualification were expected to finish in Q2 2018. Management anticipated initial phased CMC regulatory submission around mid-2018 and a possible product approval in late 2019 to early 2020, subject to FDA review and requests.
  • Management expected Tri-Shield availability to remain constrained in Q2 and Q3, with production capacity equivalent to approximately $500,000–$750,000 of sales by or during Q4 2018. It reported early positive production-process results in Q2; these are forward-looking statements, not reported Q1 results.
  • Management estimated 2018 depreciation expense at approximately $2 million and cautioned that increased non-cash depreciation could contribute to a full-year net loss. It also estimated 2018 interest expense at approximately $441,000 if remaining equipment-loan funds were drawn, using an assumed 4.5% rate.
  • Principal risks include production yields and supply constraints, customer concentration (two distributors accounted for 58% of Q1 sales), reliance on First Defense, regulatory approval and commercialization risks for Nisin, variable-rate debt, and exposure to dairy and beef market conditions. A $100,000 termination fee could apply under a contract if Nisin approval is not achieved by the end of 2019.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether the company cleared the First Defense backlog and achieved the planned production and yield improvements.
  2. Whether Tri-Shield supply, sales and customer acceptance progressed as management expected.
  3. Progress on Nisin facility qualification, FDA submissions and approval timing, including contract status with key manufacturing providers.
  4. Cash available above the $2.0 million covenant minimum, debt service and covenant compliance as capital spending and depreciation increase.
  5. Whether gross margin and operating cash generation recover from Q1 levels, and how distributor concentration and weaker international sales develop.