MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC quarterly report, Q2 FY1995

Micron Technology Inc. 10-Q Summary

Business Context and Reporting Period

This Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q) covers the period ended June 1, 1995. Micron Technology, Inc. is a manufacturer of semiconductor memory products, primarily DRAMs. The reporting period includes the effects of a merger transaction effective April 7, 1995, combining Micron Computer, Inc. and Micron Custom Manufacturing Services, Inc. with ZEOS International Ltd. to form Micron Electronics, Inc., in which Micron holds approximately a 79% ownership interest.

Key Financial Metrics

MetricQ3 1995Q3 19949 Months 19959 Months 1994
Net Sales$761.2M$426.4M$1,924.7M$1,137.0M
Net Income$220.2M$104.3M$563.0M$258.6M
Earnings Per Share (Diluted)$1.02$0.49$2.62$1.23
Gross Margin53.1%51.5%55.9%49.2%
Operating Cash Flow (9mo)$693.7M
Cash & Equivalents$118.2M$78.4M (Sep 94)End of Period
Total Debt (Current + Long-term)$188.3M$154.5M (Sep 94)End of Period

Liquidity: As of June 1, 1995, the company held $118.2 million in cash and equivalents and $505.5 million in liquid investments, totaling approximately $624 million in liquid assets.

Material Changes vs. Prior Period

  • Revenue Growth: Net sales increased 78.5% year-over-year for the quarter and 69.3% for the nine-month period, driven by increased production of 4 Meg DRAMs and favorable market pricing.
  • Profitability: Net income more than doubled year-over-year. Operating income rose to $316.0 million for the quarter.
  • Merger Impact: The quarter included a $29.0 million nonrecurring pretax gain from the ZEOS merger transaction.
  • Contingency Charge: Results were reduced by a $25.0 million pretax charge related to product and process technology rights contingencies.
  • Capital Expenditures: Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment totaled $451.7 million for the nine months ended June 1, 1995, compared to $176.6 million in the prior year period.

Outlook, Risks, and Management Commentary

  • Market Conditions: Management notes stable pricing for DRAM products for twelve consecutive quarters, a deviation from historical declining trends. However, they cannot predict when prices may return to historical trends.
  • Product Transition: The company is transitioning from 4 Meg DRAMs to 16 Meg DRAMs. This shift may adversely impact gross margins as capacity moves from mature to next-generation devices.
  • Capital Needs: Significant expansion is underway, including a new manufacturing complex in Lehi, Utah, with expected capital expenditures exceeding $1.5 billion over four years. The company may require external sources of liquidity to fund these projects.
  • Risks:
    • Technology Infringement: The company faces potential claims regarding product and process technology rights. While a liability has been accrued, management cannot estimate the range of additional possible losses.
    • Yield Volatility: Manufacturing yields for new generation devices are uncertain and critical to financial results.
    • Competition: Competitors are adding 8-inch wafer facilities, which could lead to excess supply and downward pricing pressure.

Investor Verification Checklist

  • Verify the sustainability of current DRAM pricing trends versus historical cyclical declines.
  • Assess the adequacy of the accrued liability for technology infringement claims and potential for additional charges.
  • Monitor the timeline and cost overruns associated with the $1.5 billion Utah manufacturing complex expansion.
  • Review the transition progress and yield rates for 16 Meg DRAM production.
  • Confirm the renewal terms for product and process technology agreements expiring in the remainder of 1995.