ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2012

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. — Q2 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The company is a Pennsylvania-based financial holding company operating Orrstown Bank, a community bank serving south-central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and position

  • Q2 earnings: Net loss was $9.9 million, or $1.23 per diluted share, versus a $10.6 million loss, or $1.33 per share, in Q2 2011. For the first half, net loss widened to $18.1 million ($2.25 per share) from $6.8 million ($0.85 per share).
  • Revenue and margin: Q2 net interest income was $9.5 million (tax-equivalent: $10.1 million), down from $12.8 million (tax-equivalent: $13.5 million). Net interest margin declined to 2.96% from 3.71%. First-half net interest income was $20.4 million, down from $25.2 million; tax-equivalent margin was 3.16% versus 3.70%.
  • Credit costs: Provision for loan losses was $23.0 million in Q2 and $42.2 million for the first half, compared with $21.2 million and $24.4 million, respectively, in 2011. The first-half net charge-offs were $49.7 million.
  • Other income and expenses: Q2 noninterest income totaled $7.0 million, including $2.6 million in securities gains; noninterest expense was $10.7 million. First-half securities gains were $4.8 million. The efficiency ratio rose to 72.7% for Q2 and 70.1% for the first half, versus 52.6% in the comparable 2011 periods.
  • Cash flow: First-half operating cash flow was $10.1 million, investing cash flow was $81.7 million, and financing cash flow was negative $95.6 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell $3.8 million to $15.8 million.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Total assets were $1.328 billion, down $115.6 million from year-end 2011. Loans were $838.0 million, down $127.5 million; deposits were $1.144 billion, down $72.5 million. Interest-bearing bank deposits were $109.7 million. Short-term borrowings were $27.5 million and long-term debt was $38.1 million.
  • Capital and equity: Shareholders’ equity declined to $107.6 million from $128.2 million, primarily reflecting the first-half loss and $2.5 million of after-tax other comprehensive losses. The Bank remained classified as well capitalized: total risk-based capital was 11.4%, Tier 1 risk-based capital 10.1%, and Tier 1 leverage 6.5% at June 30.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Credit deterioration and remediation dominated results. Nonaccrual loans were $56.9 million, down from $83.7 million at year-end 2011 but up from $14.8 million at June 2011. Nonperforming assets were $59.3 million, compared with $85.9 million at year-end and $16.0 million a year earlier.
  • The company sold 65 classified notes, with a $28.6 million book value, for $19.7 million, recording an $8.9 million charge-off. It also changed its impaired-loan charge-off approach; management estimated this increased first-half charge-offs by $43 million versus prior methods.
  • Loan balances fell as the company curtailed originations to focus on credit administration and underwriting. Commercial and industrial loans declined to $211.7 million from $277.9 million at year-end; commercial and land development loans declined to $49.2 million from $77.6 million.
  • Lower average earning assets, weaker loan and securities yields, and a larger average balance of impaired loans reduced net interest income. Funding costs also fell, but not enough to offset those pressures.
  • Q2 losses were modestly narrower year over year, aided in part by a larger income tax benefit and higher securities gains; first-half losses were substantially larger year over year.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management anticipated continued net interest margin pressure as nonaccrual loans weigh on loan yields and securities mature or pay off and are reinvested at lower rates. It expected the efficiency ratio to remain elevated, employee costs to exceed prior-year levels, and FDIC insurance expense to rise in the remaining 2012 quarters.
  • The company and Bank entered into a Federal Reserve Written Agreement and the Bank entered into a Pennsylvania Department of Banking Consent Order in March 2012. The Bank submitted capital plans to regulators. Dividends and share repurchases are restricted without prior regulatory approval; the quarterly dividend had been discontinued in 2011.
  • A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting relating to loan ratings and the allowance for loan losses had not been fully remediated. The company reported ongoing third-party loan-rating reviews, policy and process improvements, and planned full implementation of allowance software by September 30, 2012.
  • A putative securities class action filed by SEPTA in May 2012 alleges misleading statements about lending practices, loan quality, financial results, and use of 2010 offering proceeds. The company disputed the allegations and said it intended to defend itself. Potential damages were unspecified.
  • Credit exposure remains sensitive to local economic and real estate conditions, collateral values, borrower performance, and management estimates. The filing notes that additional loan-loss provisions or foreclosed-property write-downs may be needed. The Bank also reported that FHLB borrowings must be secured by acceptable collateral.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments included $151.7 million to fund loans and $17.8 million of standby letters of credit. The company reported $8.4 million of limited recourse exposure on $132.7 million of loans sold through the FHLB mortgage program.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether nonaccrual, criticized, and restructured loans continue to decline, and whether collateral appraisals support recorded values and charge-offs.
  • Whether the $36.2 million loan-loss allowance remains adequate as credit conditions and charge-off trends evolve, particularly following the methodology change.
  • Progress on regulatory orders, capital plans, and remediation of the material weakness; confirm the effect of restrictions on dividends, repurchases, and funding.
  • Trends in net interest margin, noninterest costs, liquidity, deposits, and regulatory capital after the balance-sheet contraction.
  • Developments in the SEPTA litigation and any related legal, reputational, or financial consequences.