PLUMAS BANCORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2015

Plumas Bancorp — Q3 2015 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. Plumas Bancorp is a California bank holding company whose subsidiary, Plumas Bank, operates 11 branches and lending offices in California, Nevada and Oregon. Its lending focuses on small and middle-market businesses and individuals. This unaudited report covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2014. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2015Q3 2014Nine months 2015Nine months 2014
Net interest income, before loan-loss provision$5.53$4.87$15.83$14.19
Provision for loan losses$0.30$0.30$0.90$0.75
Non-interest income$2.05$1.90$5.91$5.48
Non-interest expense$4.66$4.29$13.99$13.31
Net income$1.60$1.33$4.17$3.39
Diluted EPS$0.32$0.27$0.82$0.68
Net interest margin4.08%4.01%4.13%4.01%
  • Balance sheet at September 30: Assets were $606.9 million, up from $538.9 million at year-end 2014. Net loans were $386.8 million, versus $366.8 million; deposits were $538.8 million, versus $467.9 million. Shareholders’ equity was $41.2 million, versus $36.5 million.
  • Liquidity and cash flow: Cash and equivalents reached $94.0 million, up $48.4 million from year-end. For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $6.5 million, investing cash outflow was $21.3 million, and financing cash flow was $63.2 million. Deposit growth was the main source of financing inflow.
  • Credit quality: The allowance for loan losses was $5.9 million, or 1.51% of gross loans, compared with $5.45 million, or 1.47%, at year-end. Nine-month net charge-offs were $0.43 million, down from $1.02 million in the comparable 2014 period. Nonperforming loans fell to $5.02 million from $6.63 million; nonperforming assets were $7.34 million, or 1.21% of assets, versus $10.23 million, or 1.90%.
  • Debt and capital: The company repaid its $7.5 million subordinated debenture in April, using $4 million of additional note borrowing and a $4 million bank dividend. The note payable stood at $5 million at quarter-end. The bank’s September capital ratios included a 12.6% common equity Tier 1 ratio, 9.3% leverage ratio and 13.9% total risk-based capital ratio; management said the bank met capital requirements.

Changes, outlook and risks

  • Nine-month net income rose $0.78 million year over year. Higher net interest income (+$1.63 million) and non-interest income (+$0.44 million) were partly offset by increased provision (+$0.15 million), operating expense (+$0.68 million) and taxes (+$0.46 million). Loan growth and lower interest expense following the debenture payoff supported results; loan yield declined amid local pricing competition.
  • Non-interest income benefited from $1.59 million in gains on SBA loan sales, up $0.51 million year over year, and an $88,000 one-time FHLB special dividend. Service-charge income declined. Expenses included higher salaries, commissions and professional fees. A $0.2 million reduction in an OREO valuation allowance was partly offset by declines in other OREO values.
  • The bank acquired a Redding branch on July 31, 2015, adding approximately $10 million of deposits and no loans. A new Reno branch was expected to open in December 2015; the company had purchased its building and budgeted approximately $1.4 million for remodeling and related equipment.
  • Management provided no earnings or financial forecast. It expected automobile-loan growth to level off as new originations are increasingly offset by paydowns. Management said available liquidity sources should support operations in the foreseeable future.
  • Risks identified include competition, interest-rate and margin changes, regional economic and real-estate conditions, credit deterioration, regulation, key-personnel loss, operational failures or fraud, and securities-market changes. About 74% of loans were real-estate related; approximately 71% were variable-rate, with 43% of variable-rate loans at their floors. Construction and land-development lending was identified as higher risk.
  • Unfunded loan commitments were $81.7 million, including $7.1 million of construction commitments expected to fund within 12 months; these commitments do not necessarily represent future cash needs. Management said ordinary-course legal proceedings were not expected to have a material adverse effect.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth, credit quality and reserve adequacy remain sustainable, particularly in commercial real estate and other regional property exposures.
  • Whether SBA loan-sale gains and the special FHLB dividend are recurring; also monitor ongoing salary, commission and professional-fee growth.
  • The terms and repayment performance of the $5 million term loan established October 1, 2015, and the availability and use of its $2.5 million line of credit.
  • Execution, costs and contribution from the Reno branch and Redding acquisition, and the development of the company’s elevated cash balance.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity, including variable-rate loans at contractual floors, and the effect of deposit growth and mix on future margins.