Business Context and Reporting Period
This Form 8-K reports on the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held by RF Industries, Ltd. on September 10, 2026. The meeting took place at 300 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, New Jersey. Approximately 76.20% of all outstanding shares (8,266,608 shares) were present in person or by proxy.
Key Financial Metrics
The filing text does not provide a clear value for revenue, profit, cash flow, margins, debt, or liquidity. This report focuses exclusively on corporate governance and voting results.
Material Changes and Voting Results
Stockholders voted on three proposals. All proposals were approved or the director was elected. The specific results are as follows:
- Proposal 1 (Election of Director): Gerald T. Garland was elected as a Class II director for a three-year term expiring in 2029.
- FOR: 4,802,621 votes
- WITHHELD: 291,632 votes
- Broker Non-Votes: 3,172,355
- Proposal 2 (Executive Compensation): Approved on a non-binding advisory basis.
- FOR: 4,955,247 votes
- AGAINST: 88,299 votes
- ABSTAIN: 50,707 votes
- Broker Non-Votes: 3,172,355
- Proposal 3 (Ratification of Auditors): Ratified CohnReznick LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2026.
- FOR: 8,193,971 votes
- AGAINST: 44,487 votes
- ABSTAIN: 28,150 votes
- Broker Non-Votes: None
Guidance, Outlook, and Risks
The filing text does not provide a clear value for future guidance, management outlook, specific risks, contingencies, or unusual items. The document serves solely to disclose the certified results of the stockholder vote.
Investor Verification Checklist
- Verify the definitive Proxy Statement filed on July 28, 2026, for detailed background on the three proposals.
- Confirm the total number of outstanding shares as of the record date to validate the 76.20% attendance figure.
- Review the upcoming fiscal year-end report (October 31, 2026) for financial performance, as this 8-K contains no financial data.
- Note the significant number of broker non-votes (3,172,355) on Proposals 1 and 2, which may indicate institutional holdings where brokers lacked discretionary voting authority.