Phoenix New Media Ltd annual report, Q4 FY2016

Phoenix New Media Limited — FY2016 Form 20-F

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. This is an annual filing; it does not provide standalone 2016 Q4 results. Financial figures below are in RMB unless stated otherwise. The audited statements are prepared under U.S. GAAP.

Business context

Phoenix New Media operates a Chinese-language PC and mobile media platform, with advertising and paid services as its principal revenue sources. Most China operations are conducted through variable interest entities (VIEs) controlled contractually rather than through direct equity ownership. Phoenix TV is the controlling shareholder.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY2016FY2015Change or context
Total revenueRMB1,444.9 millionRMB1,609.2 millionDown 10.2%
Net advertising revenueRMB1,232.2 millionRMB1,226.5 millionUp 0.5%; 85.3% of FY2016 revenue
Paid services revenueRMB212.7 millionRMB382.7 millionDown 44.4%, principally from lower MVAS demand
Gross profit / marginRMB718.1 million / 49.7%RMB779.8 million / 48.5%Profit down 7.9%; margin up 1.2 percentage points
Operating income / marginRMB35.4 million / 2.4%RMB79.0 million / 4.9%Operating income down 55.2%
Net income attributable to Phoenix New MediaRMB80.6 millionRMB73.6 millionUp 9.5%; RMB0.14 per ordinary share and RMB1.12 per ADS, basic
Net cash from operating activitiesRMB203.7 millionRMB220.8 millionDown 7.8%
Cash and cash equivalentsRMB202.7 millionRMB310.7 millionYear-end balance
Term deposits and short-term investmentsRMB781.3 millionRMB769.7 millionSeparate from cash and cash equivalents
Short-term bank loansRMB358.6 millionRMB131.0 millionUp; substantially secured by restricted cash
Total current assets / current liabilitiesRMB2,122.7 million / RMB983.1 millionRMB1,930.9 million / RMB742.8 millionCurrent ratio approximately 2.2x at FY2016 year-end

Other comprehensive income included a RMB247.3 million after-tax fair-value gain on available-for-sale investments, mainly affecting comprehensive income rather than net income. The company reported total assets of RMB3,168.5 million and total liabilities of RMB1,006.1 million at year-end.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Revenue mix shifted further toward advertising: advertising revenue was nearly flat, while paid services contracted sharply. Mobile advertising revenue increased 53.8% to RMB533.8 million; PC-based advertising faced weaker demand.
  • Operating expenses fell 2.6% to RMB682.7 million, but rose to 47.3% of revenue from 43.6%. Management cited lower share-based compensation, partly offset by higher mobile traffic-acquisition costs.
  • Share-based compensation expense was RMB1.9 million, versus RMB34.4 million in 2015. The company said higher estimated forfeiture rates reduced 2016 compensation by RMB27.6 million; an October 2016 option exchange also generated incremental compensation expense.
  • Operating cash flow was supported by lower accounts receivable and non-cash adjustments, including RMB48.2 million of doubtful-account provision. The allowance for doubtful accounts increased to RMB91.3 million from RMB58.8 million.
  • Available-for-sale investments rose to RMB939.4 million, principally the fair-valued Particle investment. The company held approximately 44.2% of Particle on an as-if-converted basis but did not consolidate it.
  • Revenue presentation changed in 2016: digital reading was reclassified into “digital entertainment.” Comparative paid-service mix percentages were revised to conform.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Management sees mobile as the primary future channel for news consumption and is pursuing mobile audience growth, ad targeting and news-feed advertising. It provides no numerical earnings or revenue guidance in the filing; it expects operating cash flows, cash and deposits to cover anticipated needs for the next 12 months from April 28, 2017.
  • Key commercial risks include ongoing decline in MVAS, dependence on advertising, competition for mobile users and advertisers, rising mobile traffic-acquisition costs, and reliance on third-party content and advertising agencies.
  • The company depends on China Mobile for paid-service distribution and collections. China Mobile-related advertising and paid-service revenue was RMB154.6 million, or 10.7% of total revenue, in 2016, down from RMB309.3 million in 2015.
  • Particle exposure is material: at year-end the company reported RMB939.4 million of Particle preferred-share investments and outstanding loans, including a convertible loan and another loan; subsequent to year-end it also advanced Particle RMB74.0 million. Repayment depends on Particle’s ability to generate cash or obtain financing.
  • Regulatory and structural risks include the VIE arrangements and pending Internet news and audio-visual licenses. The filing says the relevant authorities had not issued these licenses as of the report date; regulatory action could restrict or halt affected services. The VIE structure’s enforceability and treatment under evolving PRC foreign-investment rules are uncertain.
  • New Phoenix TV content agreements run through May 2019 and cost RMB10.0 million for the first year, increasing 15% annually. Unlike the prior agreements, they do not grant sublicensing rights; renewal or reacquisition of those rights is uncertain.
  • A copyright case seeks approximately RMB235.8 million in damages over a literary work that generated less than RMB1,500 in revenue. The case was at a preliminary stage and the company could not estimate a reasonably possible loss. The filing also reports RMB1.5 million of aggregate damages and settlements paid across 75 PRC cases from January 2016 through March 2017.
  • Other exposures include RMB21.7 million of uncertain tax positions, reliance on PRC preferential tax qualifications, RMB354.6 million of restricted cash securing bank loans, currency and repatriation constraints, and potential U.S. PFIC tax status for 2016.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the annual-period comparison: the filing does not present Q4-only financial results.
  • Track whether advertising growth and mobile monetization can offset continued paid-services and MVAS declines, while controlling traffic-acquisition costs.
  • Review cash availability and debt maturities, distinguishing unrestricted cash and deposits from restricted cash pledged for loans.
  • Assess Particle’s valuation assumptions, loan repayment and conversion terms, and the concentration of capital committed to this investee.
  • Monitor licensing and VIE developments, the Phoenix TV content and trademark arrangements, and the outcome or estimated exposure of the RMB235.8 million copyright claim.