DORIAN LPG LTD. quarterly report, Q2 FY2020

Dorian LPG Ltd. — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended September 30, 2019 (fiscal second quarter and first half). The company owns and operates very large gas carriers (VLGCs) transporting LPG worldwide; most of its fleet participates in the Helios Pool, a 50%-owned joint venture.

Financial performance and position

  • Quarter revenue: $91.6 million, up 124.5% from $40.8 million. Net income was $40.7 million ($0.75 basic and $0.74 diluted per share), versus a net loss of $8.2 million ($0.15 per share) a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, was $67.3 million versus $17.9 million.
  • First-half revenue: $152.8 million, up 123.2% from $68.5 million. Net income was $46.8 million ($0.86 basic and $0.85 diluted per share), versus a net loss of $28.8 million ($0.53 per share). Adjusted EBITDA was $105.7 million versus $23.0 million.
  • Revenue drivers: Net pool revenue, reported as related-party revenue, was $80.9 million for the quarter and $131.0 million for the half year. Management attributed the improvement principally to higher spot rates and lower bunker prices. TCE rates rose to $47,623 per day for the quarter and $38,321 for the half year. Fleet utilization was 92.9% for the quarter and 95.7% for the half year.
  • Margins: Operating margin was approximately 53.8% for the quarter and 45.5% for the half year; net margin was approximately 44.4% and 30.6%, respectively. These are calculated from reported revenue and income.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities generated $60.8 million in the first half, compared with $9.2 million used in the prior-year period. Investing used $4.3 million and financing used $39.2 million, including $32.0 million of debt repayments and $7.2 million of treasury-stock purchases. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $83.7 million at period end.
  • Liquidity and debt: Cash and cash equivalents were $46.4 million; restricted cash was $37.2 million ($1.2 million current and $36.0 million non-current). Debt obligations were $678.1 million gross and $665.5 million net of deferred financing fees, including $64.0 million due within 12 months. Total liabilities were $687.8 million and shareholders’ equity was $954.4 million.

Material changes and notable items

  • Quarter revenue growth was primarily driven by stronger pool results and market rates. The Baltic LPG spot-rate index averaged $65.991 in the quarter, versus $40.245 a year earlier. Lower bunker prices also supported TCE performance.
  • For the six-month comparison, higher TCE rates and utilization drove growth. Utilization increased from 89.7% to 95.7%; daily vessel operating expense declined from $8,460 to $8,324.
  • Debt was reduced by $32.0 million during the first half. Interest and finance costs fell 7.4% year over year for the half, principally reflecting lower average indebtedness.
  • Unrealized derivative results weakened: a $6.7 million loss for the half year versus a $2.8 million gain in the prior-year period, mainly from interest-rate swap fair-value changes. This is a non-cash component of reported earnings.
  • No BW proposal-related professional or legal costs were recorded in the first half, compared with $2.3 million in the prior-year period. The acquisition and proxy proposals had been withdrawn in October 2018.
  • The board authorized up to $50 million of share repurchases through December 31, 2020. By September 30, the company had repurchased 586,387 shares for approximately $6.2 million under the program; an additional October repurchase was disclosed.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Management expected cash on hand and operating cash generation to meet liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months, while noting that additional financing or amendments could be needed if those sources prove insufficient. No earnings or rate guidance was provided.
  • A July 2019 amendment to the 2015 debt facility set a minimum interest-coverage ratio of 2.00 through March 31, 2020 and 2.50 thereafter. If coverage fell below 2.50 during the specified period through March 31, 2020, consolidated liquidity had to be at least $47.5 million.
  • Environmental compliance requires investment. The company reported $8.8 million of firm scrubber-purchase commitments at September 30, excluding installation costs, and $0.4 million of ballast-water-system commitments. It cited the IMO’s 2020 low-sulfur fuel requirement and related cost uncertainty. Four VLGCs were scrubber-equipped by the later MD&A date; scrubber installation commitments and counts vary by the disclosure date.
  • Independent vessel appraisals indicated potential impairment indicators for 14 VLGCs, but management recorded no impairment after estimating future cash flows. Its sensitivity analysis indicated a 40% reduction in assumed 10-year average spot TCE rates could trigger an approximately $16.4 million impairment on 13 vessels.
  • Related-party and pool exposure merits attention: receivables from Helios Pool were $87.5 million, including $20.9 million of working capital contributed. Management said maximum pool exposure was limited to receivables. Pool distributions depend on voyage timing, market rates and bunker prices.
  • Other risks include LPG shipping-rate and vessel-value volatility, geopolitical disruption and attacks or seizures affecting shipping routes, interest-rate exposure, customer credit/performance, and drydocking and operating costs. The company reported no legal claim requiring disclosure or a provision and no off-balance-sheet arrangements.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether elevated spot rates and TCE performance persist, and how much revenue remains exposed to variable Helios Pool results.
  • Helios Pool receivable balances, timing of collections and working-capital requirements, given the related-party concentration.
  • Debt-covenant headroom, restricted-cash availability and scheduled principal repayments.
  • Total scrubber installation costs and timing beyond the disclosed purchase commitments, alongside other environmental compliance spending.
  • Vessel impairment assumptions, especially the sensitivity to future TCE rates and vessel values.