NANOVIRICIDES, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2014

NanoViricides, Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: Fiscal quarter and six months ended December 31, 2013; unaudited. The filing identifies NanoViricides as a development-stage biopharmaceutical company. It had no commercialized products and reported no revenue.

Financial performance and position

MetricQuarter ended Dec. 31, 2013Six months ended Dec. 31, 2013Prior comparable period
RevenueNone reportedNone reportedNone reported
Research and development expense$1.130 million$2.305 million$0.710 million and $1.920 million, respectively
General and administrative expense$0.621 million$1.335 million$0.533 million and $0.917 million, respectively
Total operating expenses / operating loss$1.751 million$3.640 million$1.244 million and $2.837 million, respectively
Net loss$1.692 million$7.965 million$1.208 million and $3.012 million, respectively
Operating cash usedNot provided for the quarter$3.518 million$2.718 million

Six-month operating expenses increased about 28% year over year, including higher R&D and G&A. The substantially larger six-month net loss included a $3.826 million loss from the change in fair value of derivatives, compared with $0.227 million in the prior period; this is a non-cash fair-value item. The filing’s six-month 2012 loss-per-share figure appears as positive $0.07 despite the reported net loss, so the text does not provide a clear reliable comparative EPS value. Quarterly basic and diluted loss per share was $0.03.

  • Cash and liquidity: Cash and equivalents were $16.949 million at December 31, up from $13.923 million at June 30. Current assets were $17.755 million and current liabilities $1.356 million, implying working capital of about $16.399 million.
  • Cash flows and financing: Six-month operating cash use was $3.518 million; investing cash use was $3.358 million, including $2.358 million for property and equipment and $1.000 million of additional security deposit. Financing provided $9.901 million, principally from a September 2013 registered equity-and-warrant offering.
  • Debt and liabilities: The balance sheet reported $3.744 million of debentures payable and a $7.578 million derivative liability at December 31. The company had issued $6 million of 8% convertible debentures in February 2013, due January 31, 2017. Total liabilities were $12.678 million.
  • Other balance-sheet changes: Net property and equipment increased to $2.721 million from $0.469 million at June 30; security deposits rose to $2.000 million from $1.000 million. Common shares outstanding increased to 50.042 million from 47.026 million, following a 1-for-3.5 reverse split and equity financing.

Material changes and developments

  • On September 12, 2013, the company raised $10.309 million gross by selling common-stock units with warrants; reported offering costs were approximately $0.619 million. Certain warrant exercises generated a further $0.186 million in September.
  • After the reporting period, a January 2014 registered offering raised $20.030 million gross, before estimated expenses of approximately $1.2 million. It comprised 3.815 million common shares and 2.480 million warrants. Management estimated about $18.8 million net of commissions.
  • The common stock began trading on NYSE MKT on September 25, 2013. The company also reported completing governance changes, including independent directors and board committees.
  • Research and development remained preclinical. The company reported encouraging preliminary non-GLP safety findings for injectable FluCide (NV-INF-1), including no adverse effects at tested doses, and planned GLP toxicology work needed toward an IND. DengueCide received U.S. and European orphan-drug designations. These are company-reported development findings, not evidence of clinical efficacy or regulatory approval.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management said December cash, together with the $2 million security deposit, supported operations for more than two years at the then-current spending rate; after the January financing it expected funding for Phase I and Phase IIa studies of at least one candidate and advancement of another. These estimates depend on external cost estimates and assumptions the company cautioned may be materially wrong.
  • The company expected continuing losses and no near-term revenue. It also said further financing would be required in future periods; its stated potential needs included approximately $10–15 million for certain clinical development and additional funding for facilities, staff, and programs. Clinical timelines, costs, and success are uncertain.
  • A planned four-year lease for an 18,000-square-foot laboratory and GMP facility in Shelton had not been finalized. The company had provided $2 million cash collateral for financing associated with the facility and reported approximately $1.1 million used for fixtures and improvements. Inno-Haven is controlled by company President and Chairman Anil Diwan, creating related-party exposure.
  • TheraCour, whose majority owner is Dr. Diwan and which is a significant company shareholder, supplies licensed technology and development services. Six-month development costs charged by TheraCour were $1.411 million; the license includes cost-plus charges and a 15% royalty on net sales. No royalties had accrued through December 31, 2013. The filing also reports related-party payables of $0.887 million.
  • Two Yidam shareholder matters remained disclosed: a Nevada books-and-records action and a Colorado derivative action. The company denied the claims and reported no litigation accrual; the Nevada Supreme Court had denied the company’s writ petition in September 2013.
  • Dr. Krishna Menon resigned as consulting regulatory officer for health reasons; the Chief Scientific Officer assumed interim duties with support from regulatory consultants. The filing’s controls discussion refers to effectiveness assessments as of June 30, 2013, rather than clearly documenting a December 31 assessment.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Reconcile the reported losses and EPS, especially the contradictory six-month 2012 per-share figure, and assess the valuation assumptions behind the large derivative liability and fair-value loss.
  • Confirm cash runway against actual burn, planned clinical and facility spending, and the net proceeds and dilution from the January 2014 share-and-warrant offering.
  • Review the debenture conversion and interest terms, outstanding warrants, potential share issuance, and the resulting dilution.
  • Examine the final facility lease, collateral arrangements, related-party approvals, and the company’s financial and operational dependence on TheraCour.
  • Verify clinical-development milestones, required GLP studies and IND plans, and distinguish company-reported preclinical results from independently validated or clinical evidence.
  • Check the status of both Yidam cases and clarify the period covered by management’s disclosure-controls assessment.