STURM RUGER & CO INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2017

Business context and reporting period

Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells firearms, primarily through independent U.S. wholesale distributors. Firearms accounted for approximately 99% of sales; castings contributed less than 1%. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the three and six months ended July 1, 2017, compared with the periods ended July 2, 2016.

Financial performance

Amounts below are in millions of dollars, except per-share data.

MetricThree months ended July 1, 2017Three months ended July 2, 2016Six months ended July 1, 2017Six months ended July 2, 2016
Net sales$131.9$167.9$299.2$341.1
Gross profit / margin$34.9 / 26.5%$56.7 / 33.8%$90.7 / 30.3%$115.8 / 34.0%
Operating income$15.3$36.5$49.2$72.7
Net income$10.2$23.5$32.4$46.8
Diluted EPS$0.57$1.22$1.79$2.44
EBITDA (non-GAAP)$25.0$45.1$68.6$89.9

For the six months, operating cash flow was $39.9 million, down from $66.1 million; capital expenditures were $10.9 million. Cash declined to $44.0 million at July 1, 2017, from $87.1 million at year-end. Working capital was $97.8 million, including the $44.0 million LIFO reserve, and the current ratio was 2.7:1. The company had no debt and its $40 million revolving credit facility was unused. Total assets were $284.1 million and stockholders’ equity was $227.6 million.

Material changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Second-quarter sales fell 21.5%; first-half sales fell 12.3%. Firearms shipments declined 14.3% and 6.6%, respectively.
  • Net income declined 56.6% for the quarter and 30.7% for the half. Gross margin contracted by 7.3 percentage points in the quarter and 3.7 points for the half, primarily as lower volume reduced fixed-cost absorption.
  • First-half estimated distributor-to-retailer sell-through decreased 13%, while adjusted NICS checks decreased 7%. Management attributed softer demand to unusually strong 2016 demand, retailer inventory and cash management, and competitors’ discounting and rebates.
  • New products, including Mark IV pistols, the LCP II, and Precision Rifle, represented $84.9 million, or 29%, of first-half firearm sales.
  • During the first half, the company repurchased 1,074,285 shares for $53.5 million (average $49.73 per share); $100 million remained authorized. Cash dividends paid were $16.3 million.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No earnings or sales guidance was provided. Management expected approximately $35 million of 2017 capital expenditures for product-introduction tooling and manufacturing upgrades, funded from operations and cash; actual spending could vary.
  • Management reported that inventory quantities had declined during the first half. If the reduction persists through year-end, a LIFO liquidation could materially affect results, although management did not quantify the potential impact.
  • A June 2017 recall of Mark IV pistols manufactured before June 1, 2017, due to potential unintentional discharge if the safety was not used correctly, resulted in a $2.5 million expense, described as the expected total recall cost.
  • Four lawsuits were pending: two product-liability matters, one patent case, and the City of Gary municipal case. Management considered the claims unfounded and did not expect litigation to materially harm financial position, but acknowledged a possible material impact on results in a particular period. The Gary case motion hearing was set for September 15, 2017.
  • Management cited potential raw-material availability and price pressures, and exposure to self-insured and deductible losses. The company reported no material change in risk factors from its 2016 annual report.
  • On August 1, 2017, the board authorized a dividend of $0.23 per share, payable August 31 to shareholders of record August 15. Future dividends depend on cash, performance, and funding needs.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether demand, distributor inventories, order backlog, and pricing trends stabilize after the reported sell-through and sales declines.
  • The financial and operational effects of the Mark IV recall, including whether costs remain within the $2.5 million estimate.
  • Year-end inventory levels and any LIFO liquidation impact on earnings.
  • Cash generation and capital-spending needs alongside repurchases and dividend payments.
  • Developments in the patent and municipal litigation and any resulting costs or exposure.