Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2014

Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. — Q1 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and period: The company designs, manufactures and sells building construction products, principally wood- and concrete-construction products. This summary covers the three months ended March 31, 2014; comparisons are with Q1 2013 unless noted. Results are unaudited and in millions of dollars except per-share data.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ1 2014Q1 2013 / comparison
Net sales$168.3$154.3; up 9.1%
Gross profit / margin$77.8 / 46.2%$64.7 / 41.9%
Operating income / margin$19.6 / 11.6%$9.0 / 5.8%
Net income$12.1$4.8
Diluted EPS$0.25$0.10
Effective tax rate38.6%47.0%
Operating cash flow$(29.0)$(18.7)
Capital expenditures$4.2$4.6

Sales rose across all regions: North America $136.9 million, up 7.2%; Europe $27.6 million, up 15.7%; and Asia/Pacific $3.8 million, up 42.2%. North America generated $22.6 million of operating income; Europe recorded a $0.9 million operating loss and Asia/Pacific a $1.2 million loss.

At March 31, cash and cash equivalents were $212.0 million, versus $251.2 million at year-end 2013 and $142.0 million a year earlier. Working capital was $476.2 million. Current assets were $571.7 million against current liabilities of $95.5 million. Debt and line-of-credit balances were negligible at $83,000. Available credit was approximately $304.6 million, including a $300 million revolving facility expiring July 2017; the company reported covenant compliance.

Operating cash use reflected seasonal increases in receivables and inventory and payments of accrued liabilities and profit-sharing contributions. Cash declined $39.2 million during the quarter. The company paid $6.1 million in dividends; $0.125 per share was declared for the quarter. Stockholders’ equity was $847.5 million.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Revenue increased 9.1%, with higher volumes the principal driver in North America and Europe. North American average selling prices were slightly lower; Europe’s higher volumes and currency translation were partly offset by lower prices.
  • Gross margin improved to 46.2%, reflecting lower costs as a percentage of sales, higher-volume factory overhead absorption and material-cost effects. Management also cited a one-time $2.3 million correction to workers’ compensation expense, net of cash profit-sharing expense.
  • The filing identifies an out-of-period adjustment for prior-period overstatement of workers’ compensation expense, net of cash profit-sharing expense. It increased Q1 gross profit by $2.3 million, operating income by $2.0 million and net income by $1.3 million; management said it was not material to the current or prior periods.
  • Operating income more than doubled, also benefiting from the prior-year $1.0 million fixed-asset impairment and lower foreign-currency losses. R&D and engineering expense rose 16.8% to $9.7 million, primarily due to professional fees, profit-sharing and personnel costs.
  • Cash was down from year-end despite higher earnings, primarily because of working-capital needs and cash payments. Foreign subsidiaries held $96.6 million that could face additional tax if repatriated; the company said it had no plans to repatriate those funds.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Management estimated full-year 2014 gross margin of 44%–45%, an effective tax rate of 37%–39%, and capital spending of $22–$24 million. It gave no clear numerical full-year sales or profit guidance.
  • The company expected Asia/Pacific to report an operating loss for 2014; management said it was too early to estimate whether Europe would achieve an operating profit.
  • Management expected steel prices to increase during Q2 2014. Steel is a major raw material, and higher costs may pressure margins if not offset by pricing. Results are seasonal, and adverse weather can delay construction activity.
  • A tentative settlement in principle was reached in April 2014 regarding Hawaii product-corrosion litigation and related insurance disputes. No final, enforceable agreement existed; potential uninsured liability could substantially exceed the tentative settlement, and the amount or range could not be reasonably estimated. A separate Nishimura case was closed after summary judgment for the company, subject to appeal.
  • Disclosure controls were concluded to be ineffective because of unremediated material weaknesses in controls over goodwill valuation and indefinite-lived in-process research and development impairment assessments. Management stated the weaknesses had not caused a misstatement of the reported statements; remediation was expected to be completed in Q4 2014.
  • Other disclosed risks include economic and construction conditions, competition, customer and supplier health, foreign-exchange exposure (not currently hedged), acquisition activity and international trade or political conditions.

Investor verification points

  • Assess the sustainability of margin and earnings growth, including the $1.3 million net-income benefit from the out-of-period adjustment and prior-year impairment comparison.
  • Track cash conversion, receivables and inventory as seasonal working capital builds unwind, and compare capital spending with the $22–$24 million estimate.
  • Monitor steel prices, selling-price trends and whether North America’s volume-led growth can offset lower average selling prices.
  • Verify progress on internal-control remediation and the company’s next goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment assessments.
  • Follow whether the tentative litigation settlement becomes final and enforceable, its conditions and insurance coverage.
  • Review segment operating performance, especially the expected Asia/Pacific loss and uncertain Europe profitability, and the use or tax implications of foreign-held cash.