UNION PACIFIC CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Union Pacific Corporation — Q3 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and nine months ended September 30, 2017; comparisons are with the same 2016 periods. Unaudited consolidated results cover the railroad and subsidiaries, reported as one operating segment.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016Nine months 2017Nine months 2016
Operating revenue$5.408B$5.174B$15.790B$14.773B
Operating income$2.012B$1.960B$5.810B$5.307B
Net income$1.194B$1.131B$3.434B$3.089B
Diluted EPS$1.50$1.36$4.26$3.68
Operating ratio62.8%62.1%63.2%64.1%
Operating cash flowNot separately reported in this filing excerpt for Q3$5.398B$5.467B

Q3 operating revenue increased 5% and diluted EPS increased 10%. For the first nine months, revenue rose 7% and diluted EPS rose 16%. Q3 freight revenue grew 4% as average revenue per car increased 5%, more than offsetting a 1% decline in carloads. Year-to-date freight revenue rose 7%, with carloads up 2%.

Operating expenses rose 6% in Q3 and 5% year to date. Higher fuel prices, compensation costs, purchased services, hurricane-related costs and the workforce-reduction charge were contributors. Q3 operating ratio deteriorated 0.7 percentage points, including a 1.6-point negative impact from the workforce plan; year-to-date operating ratio improved 0.9 points.

Cash flow, debt and liquidity

  • Cash from operations was $5.398B for the first nine months, down from $5.467B. Capital investment was $2.379B, versus $2.604B; dividends paid were $1.460B, versus $1.382B.
  • Management-reported free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure defined as operating cash flow less investing cash flow and dividends, was $1.678B, compared with $1.266B.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $1.847B at September 30, up from $1.277B at year-end 2016; short-term investments were $90M.
  • Total debt was $16.833B, up from $15.007B at year-end. Debt to capital increased to 46.8% from 43.0%; adjusted debt to capital, including lease and pension adjustments, increased to 50.4% from 47.3%.
  • The company had $1.7B available under its revolving credit facility and reported compliance with its debt-to-net-worth covenant. It had $200M outstanding under a receivables securitization facility and no commercial paper outstanding.
  • Cash used in financing was $2.568B, including $2.882B of share repurchases and $1.460B of dividends, partly offset by $2.285B of debt issued.

Material changes and operating context

  • Freight revenue growth varied substantially by commodity in Q3: Industrial Products increased 26%, while Agricultural Products and Coal each declined 2%, and Automotive declined 3%. Industrial Products benefited from shale-related frac sand and other shipments.
  • Hurricane Harvey disrupted the Southern network and reduced Q3 earnings by approximately $0.04 per diluted share, through lost revenue and additional operating costs. Average train speed fell 2% to 25.4 mph and terminal dwell time rose 7% to 30.0 hours; the filing also cites Positive Train Control implementation and testing as a drag on speed.
  • Management approved a workforce reduction plan affecting approximately 460 management and 150 agreement positions, with another 100 agreement positions identified for elimination during the remainder of 2017. The plan generated an $84M pretax Q3 charge; actions were substantially complete and no further plan charges were expected.
  • Q3 other income included a $65M favorable litigation settlement for back rent and a $57M real-estate sale gain. Nine-month other income also benefited from real-estate gains and higher rental income.
  • Q3 share repurchases totaled 11.8M shares at an average $106.69 per share. The company had authority to repurchase up to 120M shares through 2020, with 92.9M remaining at September 30.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Management expected the 2017 capital plan to be approximately $3.1B, subject to business conditions and regulatory factors. No specific earnings or revenue guidance was provided in the filing text.
  • Management said known claims, environmental costs, commitments and guarantees were not expected to have a material adverse effect after recorded liabilities and insurance recoveries. However, outcomes remain uncertain. Recorded environmental liabilities were $201M; asbestos liabilities were $101M. Personal injury liability was $287M, with estimated settlement costs potentially ranging from $287M to $313M.
  • Fuel-surcharge antitrust litigation remained ongoing. On October 10, 2017, a court denied class certification; the company continued to deny the allegations and planned to defend the cases. The Oxbow matter was in discovery. A California drayage-reporting matter was settled for a $525,000 fine paid in August 2017.
  • Six rail unions reached a tentative national agreement on October 5, 2017, covering January 2015 through December 2019; it represented nearly 60% of U.S. railroad employees in collective bargaining.
  • Adoption of the new lease accounting standard was expected to significantly increase reported assets and liabilities. The company expected no material financial-statement impact from the new revenue standard.
  • Management reported no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors or market-risk disclosures. Forward-looking statements remain subject to operational, economic, regulatory, labor, litigation and other uncertainties.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether revenue-per-car gains and industrial-products strength persist, and how demand trends in coal, agriculture, automotive and chemicals develop.
  • Whether the network recovers from hurricane disruption and improves train speed and terminal dwell time, including as Positive Train Control work continues.
  • The sustainability of operating-ratio improvement after excluding the workforce charge and other unusual gains or costs.
  • Debt growth, leverage, planned repurchases and capital spending relative to operating cash generation and liquidity.
  • Developments in labor negotiations, antitrust litigation, personal-injury and environmental exposures, and the future balance-sheet effect of lease-accounting adoption.