USBC, Inc. annual report, FY2016

Business context and reporting period

Filing identity: The supplied filing is Visualant, Inc.’s Form 10-K, not a filing identified as USBC, Inc. It covers the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016; it is an annual report, not a standalone fourth-quarter report.

Visualant develops ChromaID, a light-based technology intended to identify and authenticate substances. Its subsidiary TransTech, a distributor of personnel-identification products, generated substantially all company revenue. ChromaID had produced only minimal revenue, and its Liquid Lab Kit remained at the prototype stage.

Financial performance and position

MetricFY 2016FY 2015
Revenue$6.024 million$6.291 million
Gross profit / margin$988,000 / 16.4%$1.016 million / 16.2%
Research and development$326,000$363,000
Selling, general and administrative$3.355 million$2.984 million
Operating loss$(2.693) million$(2.330) million
Net loss$(1.746) million$(2.631) million
Cash used in operating activities$(3.374) million$(240,000)
  • Revenue fell 4.2%, primarily due to lower TransTech product sales. Gross margin edged up from 16.2% to 16.4%.
  • Net loss improved, but mainly because of a $2.560 million noncash gain from revaluing derivative liabilities. This was partly offset by a $1.278 million loss on debt conversion. Operating loss widened.
  • Cash was $188,000 at year-end. Current assets were $1.313 million versus current liabilities of $5.440 million; management reported a working-capital deficit of approximately $3.982 million, excluding derivative liabilities.
  • Year-end liabilities included $909,500 of convertible notes and $1.170 million of notes payable, all classified as current. Trade accounts payable were $1.984 million, and accrued expenses due to related parties were $1.109 million.
  • Financing activities provided $3.497 million, including proceeds from stock and preferred-stock sales, warrant exercises, and convertible notes.

Changes, outlook, risks and unusual items

  • SG&A rose $371,000, with higher business-development, investor-relations and consulting costs. R&D spending declined $37,000.
  • Management expected continued losses while commercializing ChromaID and stated that year-end cash would fund operations only through January 31, 2017. It said additional financing was needed; the auditor’s report highlighted substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
  • In August 2016, Visualant raised $1.25 million through Series C preferred stock and $500,000 from a common-stock sale, each accompanied by warrants at a $0.70 exercise price. The Series C carried an 8% yield and conversion features; accounting for its beneficial conversion feature generated a $1.16 million preferred-stock dividend charge.
  • Subsequent events included a planned best-efforts Series D offering of up to $2.5 million, additional note financing, and conversion of $695,000 of notes into shares and warrants. These transactions may materially dilute existing shareholders.
  • Related-party financing is significant: the company reported $1.547 million owed to CEO Ronald Erickson or affiliated entities. Certain notes were secured or could obtain a second lien; subsequent amendments extended some due dates.
  • Management identified a material weakness in internal controls and concluded disclosure controls were ineffective, citing the lack of an audit committee financial expert. Management expected to appoint an independent financial expert.
  • Other key risks include early-stage commercialization and uncertain customer adoption, reliance on partners and concentrated TransTech vendors, financing availability, potential dilution, and dependence on intellectual-property protections. The filing reported no material pending legal proceedings and no material off-balance-sheet arrangements.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer: the filing names Visualant, Inc. (ticker VSUL), which does not match the request metadata naming USBC, Inc.
  • Review the audited financial statements and notes for the full debt maturity schedule, covenant status, collateral, and subsequent extensions or conversions; the filing cites different debt totals in different sections.
  • Verify post-year-end cash, financing proceeds, payment obligations, and whether the company obtained funding beyond management’s stated January 31, 2017 cash runway.
  • Reconcile the share counts and potential dilution from outstanding warrants, preferred-stock conversions, and convertible notes; the filing presents figures as of different dates and some amounts are described as unknown.
  • Assess whether ChromaID has secured meaningful paying customers or licenses, and whether the company has remediated its disclosed control weakness.