Vistra Corp. annual report, FY2017

Vistra Energy Corp. (now Vistra Corp.) — FY 2017 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Year ended December 31, 2017. Amounts are in U.S. dollars; financial figures below are generally in millions unless noted. The company emerged from Chapter 11 on October 3, 2016 and adopted fresh-start accounting, so results before and after emergence are not directly comparable.

Business context

Vistra operated an integrated Texas electricity business through Luminant (generation, wholesale sales and commodity risk management) and TXU Energy (retail electricity). It reported Wholesale Generation and Retail Electricity segments. At year-end, TXU Energy served approximately 1.7 million customers and Luminant operated approximately 13,600 MW of ERCOT capacity. All generation facilities were in ERCOT.

Financial results and liquidity

MetricFY 2017 / year-endContext
Operating revenue$5,430Includes $1,386 of intersegment revenue eliminations.
Operating income$198Calculated operating margin: approximately 3.6% of revenue.
Net income (loss)$(254); $(0.59) per diluted shareIncludes $504 income tax expense, including a $451 reduction in deferred tax assets from the TCJA.
Segment operating income (loss)Wholesale Generation $(186); Retail Electricity $461Generation results included mark-to-market losses and plant retirement charges.
Cash from operating activities$1,386Included $238 cash received in the Alcoa settlement and a $146 source of cash from lower derivative margin postings.
Cash used in investing / financing$(541) / $(201)Investing included the $355 Odessa acquisition and $190 for Upton solar development.
Cash and available liquidity$1,487 cash; $2,328 total liquidityLiquidity includes available revolving and letter-of-credit facility capacity; restricted cash is excluded from reported cash.
Debt$4,423 long-term debt, including current maturitiesIncludes $4,323 under Vistra Operations Credit Facilities; reported capitalization was 41% debt and 59% equity.

Year-end total assets were $14,600, equity was $6,342, asset retirement obligations were $1,936, and the recorded Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA) obligation was $357. The TRA’s estimated undiscounted payments were approximately $1.2 billion, subject to assumptions and timing.

Changes and unusual items

  • Fourth-quarter 2017 revenue was $944, operating loss was $(462), and net loss was $(579). In fourth-quarter 2016, revenue was $1,191, operating loss was $(161), and net loss was $(163). The filing attributes the 2017 fourth-quarter results in part to generation retirements and tax reform.
  • For the full year, operating results were affected by $206 of charges related to planned generation retirements, $25 of long-lived-asset impairment, and commodity and interest-rate mark-to-market activity. An unplanned Comanche Peak unit outage from June to August reduced pretax earnings by an estimated $74.
  • In October 2017, Alcoa paid Vistra approximately $238 to terminate long-term agreements associated with Sandow Unit 4 and the Three Oaks Mine; Vistra recorded an $11 gain from the settlement’s overall accounting effects.
  • Vistra acquired the 1,054 MW Odessa gas-fired plant for approximately $355, plus a five-year earn-out, and spent approximately $190 on the planned 180 MW Upton solar project.
  • Vistra announced retirement of approximately 4,167 MW at Monticello, Sandow and Big Brown; the facilities went offline in January and February 2018. The company also expected to spend approximately $350 over five years on mine reclamation.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Management expected sufficient credit-facility availability and operating cash flow to fund requirements for at least the next 12 months. Estimated 2018 capital expenditures and nuclear fuel purchases were approximately $396, including $17 for environmental expenditures.
  • At December 31, 2017, Vistra estimated that it had hedged 90% of its 2018 and 22% of its 2019 natural-gas price exposure, and 83% and 42% of heat-rate exposure, respectively. These estimates do not eliminate market, liquidity or counterparty risk.
  • The proposed Dynegy merger was expected to close in the second quarter of 2018, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals and other conditions. Vistra shareholders were expected to own approximately 79% of the combined company. Termination fees could reach $100 million for Vistra in specified circumstances.
  • Key exposures include ERCOT power and natural-gas prices, weather and seasonality, generation outages, customer competition, collateral requirements, variable-rate debt and environmental regulation. Regional haze and other EPA proceedings could have material effects; outcomes and potential costs were not clear in the filing.
  • The TCJA’s overall effect remained uncertain despite the lower corporate tax rate. Vistra also disclosed potential tax indemnities tied to the spin-off and TRA payments that could vary materially from estimates; certain merger or change-of-control events could accelerate TRA payments.
  • The filing reported no material outstanding guarantee claims and no off-balance-sheet arrangements. The Upton solar project’s expected operating timing is described as spring 2018 in one section and summer 2018 in another.

Investor verification priorities

  • Verify subsequent operating performance, cash generation and realized margins after the 2018 retirement of 4,167 MW of capacity.
  • Check actual environmental compliance costs, mine-reclamation spending and developments in EPA litigation and rulemaking.
  • Reconcile TRA estimates and payments with realized tax benefits, taxable income and any effects of the Dynegy transaction.
  • Review debt maturities, interest-rate exposure, restricted cash, facility availability and collateral needs under commodity-price stress.
  • Confirm the Dynegy merger’s final terms, regulatory and shareholder approvals, integration costs, asset-sale requirements and realized synergies.
  • Clarify the Upton solar project’s operating schedule and compare actual project costs with the stated estimates.