AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. — Q2 2015 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period

The company is a bank holding company operating AuburnBank, serving individuals and businesses primarily in Lee County and surrounding areas in East Alabama. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2015; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2014. Dollar amounts are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and condition

  • Q2 earnings: Net interest income (GAAP) was $5.79 million, versus $5.25 million in Q2 2014. Net income rose to $2.15 million from $1.86 million; diluted EPS was $0.59 versus $0.51. Tax-equivalent net interest income was $6.13 million, up 10% year over year, including about $0.2 million of interest recoveries on two previously impaired loans.
  • First-half results: GAAP net interest income was $11.31 million, versus $10.52 million; tax-equivalent net interest income was $11.98 million, up 7%. Net income increased to $4.01 million from $3.68 million, and diluted EPS to $1.10 from $1.01. Excluding the $0.2 million interest recoveries, tax-equivalent net interest income rose 5% year over year.
  • Revenue and expenses: First-half noninterest income increased to $2.49 million from $1.84 million; reported total revenue, using tax-equivalent net interest income, was $13.80 million versus $12.36 million. Noninterest expense increased to $8.34 million from $7.74 million. First-half efficiency ratio was 57.65%, compared with 59.56%.
  • Margins and returns: First-half tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.22%, up from 3.14%; Q2 margin was 3.29%, versus 3.09% in Q2 2014. First-half return on average assets was 1.01% and return on average equity was 10.31%.
  • Loans and credit: Loans net of unearned income were $408.5 million, up from $403.0 million at year-end; average loans increased 6% year over year in the first half. Commercial real estate represented about 45% of loans, residential real estate 28%, and construction and land development 9%. The allowance was $4.9 million, or 1.20% of loans. The company recorded no loan-loss provision in the first half, versus a $0.4 million provision credit in first-half 2014; first-half net recoveries were $50,000.
  • Asset quality: Nonperforming assets were $1.86 million, or 0.23% of assets, compared with $1.65 million at year-end and $4.39 million in Q2 2014. Nonaccrual loans were $1.36 million; $442,000 of loans were over 90 days past due and still accruing. Potential problem loans declined to $6.58 million from $7.83 million at year-end. TDRs totaled $1.95 million, down from $3.27 million.
  • Liquidity, funding and debt: Cash and cash equivalents were $108.2 million, up from $83.5 million at year-end. Deposits rose to $716.0 million from $693.4 million, including growth in noninterest-bearing deposits to $149.7 million from $130.2 million. Long-term debt fell to $7.2 million from $12.2 million after repayment of a $5.0 million FHLB advance; short-term repurchase borrowings were $2.9 million. The bank reported $232.3 million of available FHLB capacity and $41.0 million of federal funds lines, with none drawn on the latter.
  • Cash flow and capital: First-half operating, investing and financing cash flows were $3.2 million, $7.7 million and $13.9 million, respectively; cash and cash equivalents increased $24.7 million. Stockholders’ equity was $77.1 million. Regulatory ratios were 15.42% CET1, 16.76% Tier 1 risk-based, 17.78% total risk-based and 10.39% Tier 1 leverage; the company said it was well capitalized.

Material changes and notable items

  • Higher loan balances and lower deposit funding costs supported net interest income growth, although yields on interest-earning assets declined 8 basis points in the first half. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities fell 15 basis points.
  • First-half noninterest income benefited from approximately $0.3 million in bank-owned life insurance death benefits and a more favorable securities gain/loss comparison. First-half 2014 included a $0.333 million impairment charge on agency mortgage-backed securities that the company intended to sell.
  • Noninterest expense included a $0.362 million prepayment penalty related to the $5.0 million FHLB repayment. The transaction reduced long-term debt and higher-cost wholesale funding.
  • Other comprehensive income was adversely affected by securities valuation changes: first-half other comprehensive loss was $1.16 million, versus income of $5.69 million in first-half 2014. Management attributed unrealized losses primarily to rising interest rates, not credit deterioration, and reported no credit-impaired debt securities at June 30.
  • Mortgage lending income rose to $0.79 million for the first half, with higher origination income partly offset by lower net servicing fees. In Q1, the company voluntarily repurchased ten current investment-property loans to the same borrower, totaling $4.0 million, after identifying underwriting deficiencies; it added review and approval controls.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

No quantitative earnings or revenue guidance was provided. Management identified potential net interest margin pressure from low securities reinvestment yields, competition for quality loans, and limited scope to reduce deposit costs further. Interest-rate movements, borrower credit quality, local real estate conditions, and commercial real estate concentrations are key risks. Management said the bank had adequate liquidity for known obligations and expected requirements over the next 12 months, and that it was within its interest-rate-risk policy limits.

At June 30, the bank had $49.4 million in unfunded loan commitments and $8.2 million in standby letters of credit. Mortgage loans serviced for Fannie Mae had an unpaid principal balance of $357.1 million; 99% were current. The company reported one required $169,000 loan repurchase and a roughly $37,000 make-whole reimbursement during the first half, with no pending requests at quarter-end. Management did not consider remaining representation-and-warranty exposure material. Management reported no pending or threatened legal proceedings expected to have a material adverse effect. Forward-looking statements remain subject to economic, regulatory, rate, credit, real estate and other risks.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth and lower funding costs can sustain net interest income as asset yields face pressure, and how results look excluding the $0.2 million interest recoveries.
  • Credit quality trends in commercial real estate, residential mortgage and construction loans; adequacy of the $4.9 million allowance; and movement in nonaccrual, 90-day-past-due and potential problem loans.
  • Effect of the investment-property loan underwriting deficiencies and any future mortgage repurchase or make-whole claims.
  • Impact of interest-rate movements on securities’ fair values, accumulated other comprehensive income and net interest margin.
  • Execution and recurring cost effects of debt reduction, alongside deposit growth, liquidity capacity and the sustainability of the $0.44-per-share first-half dividend.