CITY HOLDING CO quarterly report, Q2 FY2021

City Holding Company — Q2 2021 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. City Holding is a West Virginia-based financial holding company operating through City National Bank, a community bank with 94 offices across West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia and southeastern Ohio. The filing reports unaudited results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2021; comparisons are with the corresponding 2020 periods unless noted. Amounts are in U.S. dollars.

Financial results and position

MetricQ2 2021Q2 2020Six months 2021Six months 2020
Net income$22.1 million$18.3 million$42.0 million$47.2 million
Diluted EPS$1.41$1.12$2.66$2.90
Net interest income (GAAP)$37.9 million$38.1 million$75.5 million$78.5 million
Provision (recovery) for credit losses$(2.0) million$1.3 million$(2.4) million$9.2 million
Non-interest income$17.4 million$14.6 million$34.1 million$48.0 million
Non-interest expense$29.6 million$28.5 million$59.4 million$57.9 million
  • Margins and returns: Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 2.81% for Q2 and 2.86% for the first half, down from 3.13% and 3.33%, respectively. Q2 ROA was 1.49% and ROE was 12.6%; first-half ROA was 1.44% and ROE was 11.9%.
  • Balance sheet at June 30: Assets were $5.90 billion; gross loans $3.53 billion; deposits $4.80 billion; cash and equivalents $609.9 million; available-for-sale securities $1.34 billion; and shareholders’ equity $695.5 million. Loans declined 2.6% and deposits increased 3.3% from December 31, 2020.
  • Debt and liquidity: Short-term borrowings, consisting of customer repurchase agreements, were $311.3 million; no long-term debt was outstanding. Management described liquidity as strong and reported City National borrowing capacity of $2.0 billion through existing facilities. Cash was $609.9 million at period-end.
  • Cash flow, first half: Operating activities provided $40.3 million, investing activities used $85.8 million, and financing activities provided $126.7 million. Cash increased $81.2 million to $609.9 million. Financing inflows primarily reflected deposit growth; share repurchases and dividends used $22.8 million and $18.4 million.
  • Credit and capital: Allowance for credit losses was $20.0 million, 0.57% of loans. Nonperforming loans were $10.0 million and nonperforming assets were $11.4 million, or 0.32% of loans and OREO. City Holding’s CET1 ratio was 16.4% and City National’s was 14.8%; both were reported well capitalized.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q2 net income rose 21% and diluted EPS increased from $1.12 to $1.41. The quarter included a $2.0 million credit-loss recovery versus a $1.3 million provision in Q2 2020, while net interest income was nearly flat.
  • First-half net income fell 11% and EPS declined from $2.90 to $2.66. The 2020 comparison included a $17.8 million pretax gain from the sale of Visa shares; excluding that item, management reported first-half ROA of 1.44% versus 1.29% and return on tangible equity of 14.3% versus 11.8%.
  • Lower asset yields reduced net interest income and margin. Management cited lower loan and securities yields, partly offset by lower deposit costs and growth in average securities balances.
  • First-half non-interest income fell $13.9 million, largely because the prior-year Visa gain did not recur. Excluding Visa and net securities/equity-security gains and losses, non-interest income increased 3.7%. Q2 non-interest income rose, led by bankcard revenue and service charges; bankcard revenue reached a quarterly record of $7.2 million.
  • Deposits increased $152 million from year-end, which management attributed largely to government Economic Impact Payments and weak loan demand. Securities increased $159 million while gross loans declined $93 million.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • No specific earnings or revenue guidance was provided. Management said results for the first half are not necessarily indicative of full-year results and continued to monitor the evolving COVID-19 situation.
  • COVID-related deferrals had largely ended for mortgage borrowers: of $144 million granted, about $2 million remained deferred. Of $479 million granted to commercial customers, $92 million—related to hotels and lodging—remained deferred. The company had funded about $136 million in PPP loans and received about $86 million in forgiveness proceeds by June 30.
  • Hotel and lodging exposure remains a notable credit sensitivity: hotel loans totaled $290.1 million. Other identified risks include economic conditions, loan quality and collateral values, interest-rate changes, cybersecurity and operational risks, competition, and regulatory or legal developments.
  • Management’s interest-rate sensitivity model estimated that an immediate, sustained 100–400 basis-point rise could increase net income over 12 months by 9.6%–17.6%. These estimates depend on assumptions about deposit repricing, loan prepayments, competition and business volumes; management cautioned they are not forecasts or guarantees.
  • The company repurchased 292,016 shares during the first half at a weighted-average price of $78.22 under a new authorization for up to one million shares. The board declared dividends of $1.16 per share for the first half.
  • Management stated that investment-security unrealized losses were temporary, did not intend to sell the impaired securities, and recorded no credit-related investment impairment losses. Ordinary-course litigation could nevertheless have positive or negative financial effects; outcomes are uncertain.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan demand and net interest margin stabilize after first-half declines, and how deposit pricing responds if rates change.
  • Whether hotel borrowers resume normal payments and whether credit quality, allowance adequacy and nonperforming loans remain stable.
  • How much PPP forgiveness, government-related deposit growth and elevated liquidity affect future loan growth and asset yields.
  • Whether fee-income growth, particularly bankcard revenue, offsets expense increases and pressure on net interest income.
  • How share repurchases and dividends affect capital and per-share results, and whether actual outcomes differ from management’s interest-rate sensitivity assumptions.