CITIZENS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Citizens Financial Services, Inc. — Q2 2013 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013; unaudited. Citizens is a Pennsylvania bank holding company whose operations are primarily conducted through First Citizens Community Bank. It serves North Central Pennsylvania and Southern New York.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2013Q2 2012Six months 2013Six months 2012
Interest income$8.948m$9.613m$17.947m$19.250m
Net interest income$7.351m$7.665m$14.664m$15.223m
Provision for loan losses$0.075m$0.105m$0.225m$0.210m
Non-interest income$1.743m$1.929m$3.595m$3.745m
Non-interest expense$4.832m$4.565m$9.654m$9.393m
Net income$3.280m$3.753m$6.567m$7.202m
Basic EPS$1.08$1.23$2.17$2.35

Q2 net income fell 12.6%; first-half net income declined 8.8%. For the six months, annualized return on assets was 1.50% versus 1.63%, and return on equity was 14.99% versus 18.25%. Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.85% for Q2 and 3.87% for the six-month period, versus 4.03% and 4.04%, respectively, in 2012.

Financial condition, cash flow and liquidity

  • At June 30, total assets were $879.1m, down 0.4% from year-end 2012. Net loans were $508.7m, up 2.6%; deposits were $748.0m, up $10.9m; and borrowed funds were $34.0m, down $12.1m.
  • Cash and cash equivalents declined $14.8m to $11.6m. First-half cash from operations was $8.6m, investing activities used $20.1m, and financing activities used $3.3m. Management said liquidity needs were supported by cash, core deposits, maturing assets and borrowing access. The Bank had $19.2m outstanding against approximately $232.2m of FHLB borrowing capacity; a $10m federal funds line and approximately $13.8m Federal Reserve line were undrawn.
  • Stockholders’ equity was $88.9m versus $89.5m at year-end. The decline reflected, in large part, a $5.3m reduction in accumulated other comprehensive income from investment-market-value changes. First-half comprehensive income was $1.2m.
  • The Company reported capital ratios above regulatory “well-capitalized” thresholds: holding-company total risk-based capital was 17.95% and Tier 1 leverage was 10.18%; Bank ratios were 17.35% and 9.82%, respectively.
  • Annualized net charge-offs were 0.01% of average loans. Nonperforming loans were $8.5m, or 1.64% of loans, and nonperforming assets were $9.1m, or 1.77%. The allowance was $7.0m, or 1.36% of loans, compared with $6.8m, or 1.35%, at year-end.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Lower yields were the principal pressure on net interest income: the average yield on earning assets declined, while the low-rate environment led to repricing of loans and securities. Lower deposit costs and reduced borrowing balances partly offset the decline.
  • Commercial and agricultural loan balances grew; management cited a focus on commercial, agricultural and municipal lending. Total loans increased $13.3m in the first half. Management also retained $4.3m of qualifying 15-year residential mortgages rather than selling them.
  • Non-interest income declined 4.0% in the first half, including lower service charges and loan-sale gains. Management attributed lower service-charge revenue partly to debit-card regulation and reduced Marcellus Shale-related activity. Non-interest expense rose 2.8%, with higher salaries and benefits tied to merit increases and increased staffing.
  • Available-for-sale securities were $307.9m. Their net unrealized position shifted materially: the portfolio had $5.7m gross unrealized gains and $3.8m gross unrealized losses at June 30; management attributed declines to market-rate and other non-credit factors and concluded impairment was not other-than-temporary. A $5.3m after-tax first-half OCI loss principally reflected securities valuation changes.
  • Management identified local unemployment and reduced Marcellus Shale exploration as factors in its allowance assessment. It also increased certain qualitative credit-risk factors because of participations purchased from other banks and differing underwriting standards.
  • Four customer relationships represented approximately 82.7% of nonperforming loans. One $4.3m commercial relationship, current under a restructured payment agreement at June 30, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July 2013; the Bank was evaluating possible effects on collateral and payments. Management stated that the allowance was adequate, while noting future adjustments could be needed if assumptions or conditions change.
  • The company paid $1.7m in first-half cash dividends and reported a five-percent stock dividend with a stated issuance-date market value of $7.2m. It had also accelerated a $1.1m first-quarter 2013 cash dividend into 2012, citing potential tax changes.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management cautioned that first-half results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. Principal risks cited include changing interest rates, economic conditions and borrower repayment capacity, securities-market disruption, loan delinquencies and credit losses, regulatory or legal changes, competition, and the local economy’s exposure to Marcellus Shale activity, natural-gas prices and related regulation. The company disclosed $92.7m of commitments to extend credit and $3.2m of standby letters of credit, in addition to $12.6m of noncontractual overdraft exposure. Management reported no litigation expected to have a material adverse effect and no material change in risk factors from its 2012 Form 10-K.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Developments in the July 2013 Chapter 11 filing involving the $4.3m commercial borrower, including payment performance, collateral values and any reserve implications.
  • Whether the concentration of nonperforming loans in four customer relationships and the adequacy of the $7.0m allowance change as credit conditions evolve.
  • Trends in net interest margin, loan and securities yields, deposit pricing, and the effect of further interest-rate changes on earnings and securities values.
  • Whether local unemployment and reduced natural-gas exploration affect borrowers, loan growth, deposit flows and credit quality.
  • Cash and liquidity trends, including the funding of loan growth, undrawn borrowing facilities and the effect of securities-market valuation changes on equity.