FARMERS NATIONAL BANC CORP annual report, FY2016

Farmers National Banc Corp. — 2016 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The company is an Ohio-based financial holding company operating banking, trust, retirement consulting, insurance and investment businesses, primarily in northeastern Ohio. The filing also reports fourth-quarter results.

Financial performance and position

Metric20162015
Total interest and dividend income$72.5 million$53.8 million
Net interest income$68.1 million$49.7 million
Net interest margin, fully taxable equivalent4.01%3.81%
Provision for loan losses$3.9 million$3.5 million
Noninterest income$23.2 million$18.3 million
Noninterest expense$59.5 million$54.0 million
Net income$20.6 million$8.1 million
Diluted earnings per share$0.76$0.36
Return on average assets / equity1.07% / 9.72%0.54% / 4.97%
  • Balance sheet at year-end: Total assets were $1.966 billion; net loans $1.417 billion; deposits $1.525 billion; total stockholders’ equity $213.2 million.
  • Credit quality: Nonperforming loans were $8.2 million, or 0.57% of loans, versus $10.4 million, or 0.81%, in 2015. The allowance for loan losses was $10.9 million, 0.76% of total loans; net charge-offs were $2.0 million, or 0.15% of average loans.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities provided $24.3 million; investing activities used $115.2 million; financing activities provided $76.7 million. Cash and cash equivalents declined by $14.2 million to $41.8 million.
  • Liquidity and debt: Core deposits represented approximately 97% of deposits. Unpledged securities were $128 million, and the Bank had an additional $144 million of FHLB borrowing capacity. Short- and long-term borrowings totaled $213.5 million, down from $248.0 million.
  • Capital: The Bank was classified as well capitalized. Its common equity Tier 1 ratio was 11.12%, total risk-based capital ratio 11.82%, and Tier 1 leverage ratio 8.91%.
  • Shareholder returns: Annual cash dividends increased to $0.16 per share from $0.12. Book value per share was $7.88 and tangible book value per share was $6.21 at year-end.

Material changes versus 2015

  • Net income rose to $20.6 million from $8.1 million. Excluding merger-related expenses, management reported adjusted net income of $21.0 million, or $0.78 per share, versus $12.9 million, or $0.57, in 2015. The reported comparison reflects acquisitions and lower merger costs as well as operating performance.
  • Growth in net interest income reflected a larger earning-asset base, including the full-year contribution of the 2015 bank acquisitions, while average loan yield remained 4.74%. Management cited lower funding costs and a shift toward higher-yielding loans as drivers of the margin increase.
  • Noninterest income increased, notably from mortgage loan sale gains ($2.8 million versus $1.1 million), insurance commissions ($1.6 million versus $0.6 million) and deposit service charges ($4.0 million versus $3.3 million).
  • Noninterest expense increased 10.1%, primarily due to higher salaries and benefits and added locations. Merger-related costs fell to $0.6 million from $6.4 million. The reported efficiency ratio improved to 61.59% from 75.26%.
  • Loans increased 10% organically during 2016; year-end deposits grew $115.7 million. The loan-to-deposit ratio was 93.63%, versus 92.04%.
  • The June 2016 Bowers Insurance Agency acquisition added insurance operations for total consideration of about $3.2 million, including contingent consideration. The company also formed a captive insurance subsidiary in 2016.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No specific earnings, revenue or margin guidance is provided. Management expected various noninterest-income sources to grow in 2017 and said it would monitor interest rates and deposit pricing.
  • Key risks include local economic weakness, interest-rate and margin sensitivity, real-estate concentration, indirect auto lending, credit losses, deposit competition and liquidity access. Real-estate loans represented about 55% of the loan portfolio according to the risk-factor disclosure.
  • A sudden 100-basis-point rate decline was modeled to reduce net interest income by 3.4%; a 300-basis-point increase was modeled to reduce it by 0.1%. Management stated modeled scenarios remained within policy limits.
  • Acquisition accounting included $1.8 million of Bowers goodwill and $1.6 million of related intangible assets; some purchase valuations were preliminary. The company reported no goodwill impairment in its 2016 annual test.
  • The available-for-sale securities portfolio had $6.6 million of gross unrealized losses at year-end, up from $4.0 million in 2015; management recorded no other-than-temporary impairment and attributed losses primarily to interest rates and liquidity, not credit quality.
  • Loan-loss estimates depend on management judgments and economic assumptions. The expected-credit-loss accounting standard (CECL) was not yet adopted; management had not determined its full impact.
  • Management believed pending and threatened legal matters would not have a material adverse effect overall, while noting an unfavorable resolution could affect a particular future period. Auditors issued an unqualified opinion; management and the auditor concluded internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of the sharp earnings increase reflects sustainable organic growth versus acquisition contributions, purchase-accounting accretion and lower merger costs.
  • Whether loan growth, real-estate and consumer credit quality, delinquency trends and the allowance remain appropriate as the portfolio expands.
  • The sustainability of the 4.01% net interest margin under changing market rates and deposit competition.
  • Liquidity and funding assumptions, including reliance on wholesale borrowings, collateral availability and the maturity profile of FHLB advances and certificates of deposit.
  • Integration and performance of Bowers and the 2015 acquisitions, including contingent payments, goodwill and intangible-asset amortization.
  • Dividend capacity and capital headroom, given regulatory limits on subsidiary dividends and the continuing Basel III capital-buffer phase-in.