ISABELLA BANK CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Business Context and Reporting Period

Isabella Bank Corporation is a Michigan community banking holding company whose retail banking operations represented at least 90% of consolidated assets and operating results. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, with comparisons to the corresponding 2010 periods and December 31, 2010 balance-sheet data. Amounts are in thousands except per-share data.

Financial Performance and Position

MetricQ3 2011Q3 20109M 20119M 2010
Total interest income$14,532$14,306$43,439$42,677
Net interest income$10,462$10,010$31,215$29,690
Provision for loan losses$963$968$2,383$3,231
Noninterest income$1,859$2,634$5,785$6,671
Noninterest expense$8,513$8,620$25,879$25,249
Net income$2,511$2,553$7,499$6,727
Diluted EPS$0.32$0.33$0.97$0.87
  • Nine-month net interest income increased 5.1%, while net income increased 11.5%. Q3 net income declined 1.6% year over year.
  • Nine-month net yield on interest-earning assets, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, was 3.90%, compared with 4.04% in 2010. Q3 net yield was 3.82%, compared with 3.98%.
  • Annualized nine-month return on average assets was 0.79%; return on average equity was 6.84%; return on average tangible equity was 10.17%.
  • Total assets increased 8.0% from December 31, 2010 to $1.324 billion. Loans increased 2.0% to $750.2 million, led by commercial and agricultural lending, while residential mortgage loans declined 1.2%.
  • Available-for-sale securities increased 25.8% to $415.9 million, reflecting deployment of deposit and borrowing growth into investments.
  • Total deposits increased 7.4% to $942.4 million. Borrowed funds increased 11.3% to $216.9 million.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $21.2 million at September 30, 2011, compared with $18.1 million at year-end. Liquidity sources considered readily available totaled $441.9 million, or 33.4% of assets, excluding illiquid auction-rate and preferred securities.
  • Nine-month operating cash flow was $13.0 million; investing activities used $92.9 million, primarily for purchases of available-for-sale securities; financing activities provided $83.1 million. Cash increased $3.1 million during the period.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $12.4 million, or 1.65% of loans, unchanged from year-end. Net charge-offs were $2.4 million, compared with $3.2 million in 2010.
  • Primary capital to adjusted average assets was 8.10%. Total risk-based capital was 13.68%, versus an 8.00% minimum cited in the filing.

Material Changes Versus Comparable Period

  • Net interest income rose due primarily to balance-sheet growth and lower funding costs, despite lower asset yields. Average loans increased, but the loan-to-asset mix shifted toward lower-yielding investments.
  • Noninterest income declined 13.3% for nine months. The principal drivers were the absence of 2010 gains on available-for-sale securities, lower service charges and mortgage-loan sale gains, and increased losses on originated mortgage servicing rights.
  • Nine-month noninterest expense increased 2.5%, mainly from higher compensation, occupancy, furniture and equipment, and audit/SOX compliance costs. Management cited additional staffing for regulatory compliance in the third quarter.
  • Nonperforming loans decreased slightly to $6.1 million, or 0.81% of total loans, from $6.1 million, or 0.83%, at year-end. Nonperforming assets were $8.1 million, or 0.61% of assets, compared with 0.67%.
  • Troubled debt restructurings increased substantially to $20.1 million from $5.8 million, partly because newly adopted ASU 2011-02 expanded the population classified as TDRs. The filing states that no TDRs modified since January 1, 2010 subsequently defaulted.
  • Accumulated other comprehensive income improved from a $1.7 million loss at year-end to $4.9 million of income, primarily from unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities.

Outlook, Risks, Contingencies, and Unusual Items

  • Management expected deposits to continue growing through the remainder of 2011 and anticipated further investment-security purchases. It expected no additional corporate-owned life insurance purchases during 2011.
  • Management anticipated a slight decline in net interest margin during the remainder of 2011 because of reinvestment of maturing or called securities at lower yields, a greater investment mix, and potential increases in funding costs.
  • Management expected NSF and overdraft fees to remain near current levels, while ATM/debit-card and trust fees were expected to continue benefiting from usage and managed-portfolio growth. No significant investment-security sales were anticipated.
  • Management expected foreclosed-asset and collection expenses to remain near current levels, although they continued to be historically high.
  • Credit risk remains concentrated in Michigan markets and is affected by real estate, agriculture, manufacturing, retail, gaming, tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions. Further declines in real estate values could require additional loan or foreclosed-asset write-downs.
  • The securities portfolio included $2.5 million of auction-rate money market preferred securities and $7.3 million of preferred stocks carried using Level 3 valuation inputs. Management recorded no other-than-temporary impairment, but trading in these instruments remained limited.
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments included $98.4 million of unfunded lines of credit, $4.6 million of commercial and standby letters of credit, and $31.5 million of commitments to grant loans. Management anticipated no significant losses from these commitments.
  • Management identified no material legal proceedings, and stated that there were no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors. Disclosure controls were evaluated as effective.
  • The filing contains no formal earnings guidance. Forward-looking statements identify interest rates, economic conditions, regulation, credit quality, collateral values, deposit flows, competition, loan demand, and accounting standards as key uncertainties.

Most Important Facts to Verify

  • Whether the sharp increase in TDR balances reflects primarily accounting reclassification or underlying deterioration in borrower credit quality.
  • Whether nonperforming loans and charge-offs continue to improve and whether the $12.4 million allowance remains adequate as local real estate and economic conditions evolve.
  • The liquidity and valuation risk of the Level 3 auction-rate and preferred securities, including the assumptions supporting recovery of unrealized losses.
  • Whether deposit growth can continue without materially increasing funding costs and whether available-for-sale securities purchases further compress net interest margin.
  • The sustainability of earnings given lower noninterest income, higher regulatory compliance costs, and mortgage servicing-rights losses.
  • Actual regulatory capital ratios at the bank subsidiary and any effect of future capital requirements on growth or dividends.