MARA Holdings, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2019

MARA Holdings, Inc. (then Marathon Patent Group, Inc.) — Q2 2019 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2019. The unaudited filing is for Marathon Patent Group, Inc.; share and per-share figures reflect the 1-for-4 reverse split effective April 8, 2019. The company reported cryptocurrency mining and retained IP licensing as its activities, with operations largely outsourced.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ2 2019Six months 2019Comparable 2018
Revenue$355,765$586,459$688,502 and $928,469, respectively
Cost of revenue$498,588$1,007,228$931,630 and $1,199,339, respectively
Operating loss$740,597$1,725,506$4,318,972 and $6,166,037, respectively
Net loss$565,880$1,610,742$4,676,645 and $7,079,465, respectively
Net loss per share$0.09$0.25$0.93 and $1.61, respectively
  • Mining revenue was the primary source of revenue; the company reported no revenue from newly issued settlement or license agreements in either 2019 period.
  • Cost of revenue exceeded revenue in both 2019 periods: gross loss was approximately $143,000 for Q2 and $421,000 for the first half.
  • At June 30, cash and cash equivalents were $1.69 million, versus $2.55 million at December 31, 2018. Current assets were $1.93 million and current liabilities $2.26 million, resulting in a $328,146 working-capital deficit.
  • First-half operating cash use was $1.47 million, compared with $5.61 million in 2018. Investing activities provided $606,363, principally from digital-currency sales; cash declined by $862,745 over the half-year.
  • Total liabilities were $2.42 million and stockholders’ equity was $1.72 million, down from $2.92 million at year-end 2018. Current convertible notes were $999,106, due December 31, 2019, with $169,753 of accrued interest disclosed. Lease liabilities totaled $240,186.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Revenue fell 48% year over year in Q2 and 37% for the first half. Management attributed much of the lower operating loss to reduced expenses; 2018 included a $2.85 million non-cash GBV merger termination fee, as well as higher professional and general and administrative costs.
  • Other income was $174,717 in Q2 and $114,764 for the first half, compared with other expenses in 2018. The first-half comparison was affected by 2018 debt-discount amortization and warrant fair-value movements. In 2019, the warrant liability increased to $115,387, with a $76,304 fair-value loss recorded for the half.
  • The company adopted lease accounting standard ASC 842 on January 1, 2019 and recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.
  • Nasdaq notified the company in May that it was below the $2.5 million stockholders’ equity listing requirement. The company subsequently reported Nasdaq approval of its compliance plan; its September 30, 2019 Form 10-Q was due by November 13, 2019 and had to evidence compliance.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Going concern: The filing states that substantial doubt exists about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management was uncertain that existing cash would fund operations for at least the next 12 months. It said additional financing or strategic alternatives may be needed; financing may be unavailable or dilutive, and insufficient funds could require curtailed operations or relinquishment of rights.
  • Subsequent financing: On July 19, 2019, the company established an at-the-market equity program for up to $7,472,417, subject to Form S-3 limits. Sales were optional and subject to a 3% commission; the filing does not report proceeds from the program during the quarter.
  • Litigation: An amended securities and common-law complaint by Jeffrey Feinberg and others sought unspecified damages and other relief. Motions to dismiss were argued on July 9, 2019 and remained under submission as of the filing.
  • Controls: Management concluded disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, citing a material weakness and the risk that material misstatements might not be prevented or detected timely. The filing says no material control changes occurred during the quarter.
  • The filing provides no specific operating or earnings guidance. Management cautioned that actual results may differ materially from forward-looking statements.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the company met Nasdaq’s stockholders’ equity requirement by the required filing deadline.
  • Cash runway, subsequent operating results, and whether the ATM program raised capital; assess potential dilution.
  • Repayment, extension, or conversion of the $999,106 note due December 31, 2019, including accrued interest.
  • Progress in remediating the disclosed material weakness and any later changes in control effectiveness.
  • Rulings or developments in the Feinberg litigation and any resulting financial exposure.