MKS INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2010

MKS Instruments, Inc. — Q2 2010 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010. Figures below are in millions of dollars unless stated otherwise. The company provides instruments, subsystems, and process-control products and services for advanced manufacturing, including semiconductor and thin-film markets.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2010Q2 2009Six months 2010Six months 2009
Revenue$220.6$75.6$412.8$147.9
Gross profit / margin$97.3 / 44.1%$24.3 / 32.1%$182.8 / 44.3%$32.8 / 22.2%
Operating income (loss)$49.9$(155.5)$92.2$(194.2)
Continuing-operations income (loss)$33.1$(146.3)$62.1$(161.3)
Net income (loss)$38.8$(207.1)$68.0$(223.6)
Diluted EPS, net income (loss)$0.76$(4.20)$1.34*$(4.55)
  • Q2 product revenue was $198.9 million and service revenue $21.7 million. Six-month product revenue rose 212.9% year over year; service revenue rose 44.4%.
  • Operating cash flow was $39.2 million for the first half, versus cash used of $5.9 million in the prior-year period. Investing cash flow was $1.9 million and financing cash flow $2.4 million.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $151.5 million and short-term investments $171.9 million at June 30, totaling $323.4 million. Current assets were $665.7 million versus current liabilities of $108.1 million.
  • Short-term borrowings were $13.0 million, primarily at the Japanese subsidiary; the filing reports interest rates of 0.73%–1.47%. No borrowings were outstanding on the separate $5 million HSBC line, which expired without renewal on July 31, 2010.

Changes, outlook, and material items

  • Revenue recovery reflected stronger demand across markets, especially semiconductor capital-equipment and device customers. Their product revenue increased 432% for the first half; product revenue to other markets rose 82%. Management cautioned that semiconductor-equipment demand can shift rapidly and that the timing and extent of further demand or weakness are uncertain.
  • Gross margin improved substantially, principally from higher volumes, favorable product mix, and lower excess-inventory charges than in 2009. The comparison is affected by the prior-year downturn, including substantial goodwill and asset impairments and restructuring charges; there were no impairment charges in the first half of 2010.
  • Research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses rose year over year, including higher compensation and incentive costs as benefits were restored and business improved.
  • During Q2 the company sold Ion for $15.1 million net cash proceeds and recorded a $4.2 million pretax gain. It also committed to divest a second product line, classified as held for sale; management reported no impairment was required. Results of both businesses are presented as discontinued operations.
  • Management said available cash and borrowings should meet working-capital and planned capital-expenditure needs for at least 12 months. No numerical revenue or earnings guidance was provided. The company expected continued significant R&D investment.
  • Risks include rapid semiconductor-market demand changes, customer concentration (one customer represented 17% of revenue in both Q2 and the first half), international and foreign-exchange exposure, product-development and design-win risks, and uncertain tax positions. Gross unrecognized tax benefits were approximately $10.7 million; accrued interest was approximately $0.9 million. Management said ordinary-course legal matters were not expected to have a material adverse effect. No material change in market-risk exposure or disclosed risk factors was reported.
  • The filing says disclosure controls were effective at the reasonable-assurance level and reports no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • EPS inconsistency: The statements of operations report first-half diluted net EPS of $1.34, while Note 13 reports $1.24; the note’s diluted continuing-operations EPS of $1.22 plus discontinued-operations EPS of $0.12 sums to $1.34. Verify against the filed financial statements and XBRL.
  • Track whether the second product-line divestiture closes, its proceeds and any resulting gain, loss, or impairment.
  • Monitor receivables and inventory growth: first-half operating cash flow included increases of $58.0 million in receivables and $28.3 million in inventory, amid rapidly rising sales.
  • Assess how much revenue growth and margin improvement depend on semiconductor demand, the major customer, and favorable product mix.
  • Review the resolution and possible financial effects of uncertain tax positions, and the renewal and availability of the Japanese subsidiary’s short-term borrowing facilities.

*The filing’s EPS figures are inconsistent as noted above. The 2009 comparison also reflects material impairment charges; 2009 cash-flow figures were revised to correct immaterial errors related to stock-based compensation tax benefits.