MID PENN BANCORP INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. — Q3 2011 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. Mid Penn Bancorp is a Pennsylvania bank holding company. This unaudited filing covers the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011; balance-sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2010. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless otherwise stated.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ3 2011Q3 2010Nine months 2011Nine months 2010
Net interest income$5.619$4.987$16.192$14.513
Provision for loan losses$0.405$0.975$1.155$2.060
Noninterest income$0.764$0.824$2.227$2.540
Noninterest expense$4.534$4.352$13.242$12.673
Net income$1.132$0.480$3.191$2.006
Net income available to common shareholders$1.004$0.352$2.806$1.621
Basic and diluted EPS$0.29$0.11$0.81$0.47
  • Taxable-equivalent net interest margin was 3.50% for the first nine months, compared with 3.49% a year earlier; net interest spread was 3.27% versus 3.21%. Management attributed higher net interest income to lower funding costs and growth in average earning assets.
  • Annualized return on average assets was 0.64% for Q3 and 0.63% for the nine-month period; return on average equity was 8.69% and 8.53%, respectively. The filing gives no comparable Q3 net interest margin value in the supplied text.
  • At September 30, assets were $720.8, up from $637.5 at year-end; deposits were $635.8, up from $555.0. Loans, net of unearned interest, were $484.4 versus $467.7, and available-for-sale securities were $151.6 versus $70.7.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $17.3, while interest-bearing time deposits at other institutions were $39.4. Shareholders’ equity was $52.5, including $10.0 of Treasury preferred stock.
  • Long-term debt declined to $22.7 from $27.9; $5.0 of Federal Home Loan Bank debt matured and was not renewed. Short-term borrowings were $0.6, down from $1.6.
  • For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $13.4, investing cash outflow was $82.8, and financing cash inflow was $73.9. Cash and cash equivalents increased $4.4 to $17.3. The investing outflow principally reflected $94.0 of securities purchases, partly offset by maturities and a decrease in interest-bearing balances.

Changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 common earnings rose to $1.004 from $0.352; nine-month common earnings increased to $2.806 from $1.621. Lower loan-loss provisions and stronger net interest income were major contributors.
  • Net interest income rose 12.7% in Q3 and 11.6% year to date. The nine-month provision fell to $1.155 from $2.060.
  • Noninterest income declined 7.3% in Q3 and 12.3% year to date, including lower deposit service charges, which management attributed partly to customer behavior and regulatory changes affecting overdraft fees. Nine-month mortgage banking income increased 26.6% amid refinancing activity.
  • Noninterest expense increased 4.2% in Q3 and 4.5% year to date. Management cited higher staffing, occupancy, FDIC assessments, and technology costs; losses on foreclosed assets were lower than in the prior-year period.
  • Deposits grew by about $80.8 since year-end, particularly demand, savings, and money-market balances; time deposits decreased $4.2. Management said deposit growth funded securities and loan growth and replaced higher-cost borrowings.

Credit quality, liquidity, outlook, and risks

  • Nonperforming loans were $12.0, or 2.47% of loans, versus $19.6, or 4.18%, at year-end 2010 and $18.8, or 3.99%, a year earlier. Nonperforming assets were $12.8. The allowance was $6.8, equal to 1.41% of loans and 56.80% of nonperforming loans.
  • Nine-month net charge-offs were $1.407, versus $1.596 in 2010. Management considered the allowance adequate but noted it is based on estimates and may require adjustment if economic conditions, collateral values, or credit quality differ from assumptions.
  • Commercial real estate, construction, and land-development loans represented 51.6% of the reported loan portfolio mix. Management described loan demand as weaker than normal, with modest improvement among creditworthy borrowers.
  • Troubled debt restructurings totaled $4.971: $4.345 was nonaccrual and $0.626 was accruing residential mortgage debt. The filing reported no defaults under the related forbearance agreements at September 30, 2011.
  • Management said liquidity remained above internal minimums and identified core deposits, securities maturities or sales, loan repayments, correspondent lines, and FHLB borrowing capacity as funding sources. No material liquidity change was anticipated, though competitive pressures and volatile interest rates were noted.
  • The Bank was reported “well capitalized”: Tier 1 leverage was 7.1%, Tier 1 risk-based capital 10.1%, and total risk-based capital 11.4%. Mid Penn’s application for up to $20 million under the Small Business Lending Fund was not approved; the company withdrew it. Treasury’s $10 million CPP preferred stock remained outstanding, carrying a 5% cumulative dividend for its first five years and 9% thereafter.
  • No formal earnings or financial guidance was provided. Management cautioned that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. Risks include economic deterioration and borrower repayment capacity, interest-rate changes, collateral values, competition, regulation, litigation, and securities-market volatility. The filing also cited the U.S. government and FHLB System credit-rating downgrades as a potential risk.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls as of September 30, 2011, and no material changes in internal control over financial reporting. It reported no litigation expected to have a material adverse effect.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether reduced nonperforming loans and provisions persist, and whether the $6.8 allowance adequately reflects commercial real estate exposure and collateral valuations.
  • Whether deposit growth can be retained at acceptable funding costs and deployed profitably despite management’s comments about subdued loan demand and lower asset yields.
  • The quality, valuation, and interest-rate sensitivity of the expanded available-for-sale securities portfolio, including the increase in unrealized gains recorded in equity.
  • The status and cost of the Treasury CPP preferred stock, including redemption approvals, dividend restrictions, and the step-up to a 9% rate after five years.
  • How the SBLF application denial and U.S./FHLB credit-rating downgrades affect capital plans, funding access, and future results.