PLUMAS BANCORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Plumas Bancorp — Q3 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and nine months ended September 30, 2017; balance-sheet comparisons are against December 31, 2016. Amounts below are in millions of dollars unless noted. Plumas Bancorp is a bank holding company whose Plumas Bank subsidiary serves businesses and individuals across Northern California and nearby areas, with lending offices in other Western states.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016Nine months 2017Nine months 2016
Interest income$7.40$6.38$21.29$18.46
Net interest income, before loan-loss provision$7.15$6.13$20.53$17.69
Net interest margin4.31%4.20%4.37%4.22%
Non-interest income$2.18$1.99$6.61$5.70
Non-interest expense$5.13$4.71$15.11$14.02
Net income$2.45$1.96$7.05$5.37
Diluted earnings per share$0.47$0.39$1.36$1.06
  • For the first nine months, net income rose 31% year over year. Management attributed the improvement mainly to higher net interest income and non-interest income, partly offset by increased operating expenses and taxes. Q3 net income rose about 25% year over year.
  • At September 30, total assets were $731.0, up $73.1 from year-end 2016. Gross loans were $479.3, up $18.2; deposits were $649.9, up $67.5; and shareholders’ equity was $55.6, up $7.6.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $101.5 and available-for-sale securities were $116.5. Nine-month operating cash flow was $8.7; investing cash use was $35.6, principally reflecting loan growth and securities purchases; financing cash provided was $65.8, primarily from deposit growth.
  • The Bank’s reported capital ratios were 12.0% common equity Tier 1, 9.0% Tier 1 leverage, 12.0% Tier 1 risk-based, and 13.2% total risk-based. Management said the Bank met capital adequacy requirements.
  • The $2.4 term-loan balance at year-end was paid off in April 2017. The company still reported $10.3 of junior subordinated debentures and $8.7 of repurchase-agreement funding. No FHLB or correspondent-bank borrowings were outstanding at quarter-end.

Material changes and credit trends

  • Loan growth was concentrated in commercial real estate, agricultural, auto, and construction lending. Commercial real estate was 49.4% of gross loans; real-estate-related lending, including agricultural loans secured by real estate, represented about 72% of the portfolio.
  • Nonaccrual loans increased to $3.8 from $2.7 at year-end 2016; nonperforming loans rose to 0.79% of total loans from 0.59%. Nonperforming assets were $4.7, or 0.64% of assets, versus $3.5, or 0.53%.
  • Watch-rated loans increased to $4.2 from $1.2, and substandard loans to $4.0 from $3.4. The allowance for loan losses was $6.8, or 1.42% of loans; nine-month net charge-offs were $0.33, compared with $0.20 in the prior-year period.
  • Deposits grew mainly through non-interest-bearing demand, savings, money-market, and NOW accounts; time deposits declined $2.8. Non-interest-bearing deposits were 42.4% of total deposits. The company reported no brokered deposits.
  • Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities narrowed to $0.2 from $1.7 at year-end. Management attributed losses primarily to market-rate conditions, said securities were paying as scheduled, and did not expect to have to sell them before recovery.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance. Management said available funding sources, including cash, securities, deposits, and borrowing facilities, should provide adequate liquidity for the foreseeable future.
  • Unfunded loan commitments were $107.7, including $23.2 of real-estate construction commitments expected to fund within twelve months; standby letters of credit were $0.5. Commitments may expire unused and are not necessarily future cash requirements.
  • Management identified risks including competitive pressure, interest-rate changes and potential margin reduction, regional economic and real-estate conditions, credit deterioration, regulation, key-personnel loss, operational failures or fraud, securities markets, and regional disasters. The business is geographically concentrated in Northeastern California and Northwestern Nevada.
  • Operating expenses included a $0.095 write-down, based on a recent appraisal, of the company’s largest other-real-estate-owned property. The filing reported ordinary-course legal matters but management did not expect them to materially affect the company.
  • The company declared a $0.14-per-share semi-annual dividend in October 2017, payable November 15, 2017. It also said adoption of the expected-credit-loss standard (CECL) is expected to affect the financial statements, particularly the credit-loss reserve; the extent was still under evaluation.

Investor verification priorities

  1. Track nonaccrual, watch, and substandard loans, charge-offs, and reserve adequacy, especially in commercial real estate and construction lending.
  2. Assess whether deposit growth and the unusually high cash balance are sustainable and how they affect future net interest margin and loan deployment.
  3. Review the $107.7 of unfunded commitments, including construction exposures, alongside available liquidity and borrowing capacity.
  4. Monitor the $95,000 OREO write-down, remaining OREO properties, and subsequent collateral valuations or dispositions.
  5. Confirm the impact and implementation assumptions for CECL, and the continuing capacity for dividends under regulatory capital and earnings conditions.