POWER INTEGRATIONS INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Power Integrations, Inc. — Q2 2013 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2013. The interim financial statements are unaudited. Power Integrations designs and markets integrated circuits and related products for high-voltage power conversion; its 2012 acquisition of Concept expanded its offering into higher-power applications, including industrial motors and renewable-energy systems.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2013Q2 2012First half 2013First half 2012
Revenue$87.9m$76.4m$165.0m$148.2m
Gross profit$46.2m$37.8m$86.1m$72.3m
Gross margin52.6%49.4%52.2%48.8%
Operating income$13.3m$9.4m$22.4m$18.1m
Net income (loss)$13.7m$(7.2)m$24.6m$0.3m
Diluted EPS$0.45$(0.25)$0.82$0.01
Operating cash flowNot separately reported by quarter$46.2m$49.3m
  • Revenue rose about 15% year over year in Q2 and 11% in the first half. Growth reflected the inclusion of Concept revenues for the full 2013 periods, plus increased sales in industrial and consumer applications; weaker computer-market sales partly offset growth.
  • Gross margin improved, which management attributed to more favorable end-market mix and lower manufacturing costs from process, wafer-size and wiring changes. Higher acquired-intangible amortization partly offset these benefits.
  • Operating expenses increased to $32.9m in Q2 and $63.7m in the first half, mainly due to Concept-related headcount and amortization, higher sales-force costs and increased product-development spending.
  • Net income comparisons are materially affected by taxes: Q2 2012 included a one-time tax charge related to settlement of the IRS examination of 2003–2006 returns. The company reported a 1.3% effective tax rate in Q2 2013 and a benefit-rate of 6.2% for the first half, citing the geographic distribution of earnings and the 2012 tax law change.

Liquidity, cash flow and capital

  • At June 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents were $85.4m and short-term marketable securities were $59.6m, totaling approximately $145.1m. Working capital was $167.5m, up from $124.3m at December 31, 2012.
  • First-half operating cash flow was $46.2m, compared with $49.3m a year earlier. Higher receivables, up $8.3m, were a significant use of cash; cash generation also benefited from noncash expenses and changes in payables, prepaid items and distributor deferrals.
  • Investing activities used $34.3m, including $6.9m for property and equipment and net purchases of marketable securities. Financing activities provided $10.1m, mainly from employee stock-plan issuances, partly offset by $4.7m of dividends.
  • No borrowings were outstanding under the $100m revolving credit facility; it expires July 5, 2015 and is subject to covenants. The company stated it was in compliance. No material change in debt was reported.
  • The quarterly dividend was set at $0.08 per share for 2013. No shares were repurchased in the first half; $29.5m remained available under the repurchase authorization.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Industrial sales rose to 35% of Q2 revenue from 28% a year earlier; consumer was 34% versus 36%, communications 21% versus 24%, and computer 10% versus 12%. International sales were 94% of revenue; Asia represented about 80% in the first half.
  • Distributors accounted for 75% of first-half revenue. The top ten customers accounted for 59%, and the largest customer for 19%. Deferred distributor revenue was approximately $25.7m at quarter-end, versus $20.7m at year-end; recognition depends on distributor sell-through and reported claims.
  • Management said cash from operations and existing liquidity should meet working-capital and other cash needs for at least the next 12 months. This expectation is conditional: weaker demand, pricing pressure or other deterioration could reduce cash generation. The filing gives no specific revenue or earnings guidance.
  • Results remain exposed to unpredictable orders and distributor inventory, end-market cyclicality, price competition, product development and supply-chain execution, and foreign currency movements. A 10% change in the U.S. dollar versus the Japanese yen could change gross margin by approximately 0.8%–1.0%, all else equal.
  • Material patent disputes remain unresolved. In the Fairchild litigation, an appeals court affirmed some infringement findings but reversed or remanded other findings, including damages; no recovery was recorded and further proceedings had no set schedule. Other U.S. and China cases, counterclaims and appeals also remain pending. The company said it could not estimate a loss or range of loss; adverse outcomes could cause monetary losses, licensing needs, injunctions or loss of technology rights.
  • Trinity Capital sued over an alleged $2.4m guarantee of SemiSouth lease obligations; Power Integrations disputed the claim and said it would contest it. The IRS audit of tax years 2007–2009 was ongoing. The company also disclosed approximately $12.3m of income-tax-related contractual obligations, not expected to be due within the next year.
  • The company reported effective disclosure controls at quarter-end. Concept integration into the company’s systems and control environment was ongoing; management reported no quarter-specific internal-control change that materially affected, or was reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much revenue growth reflects Concept versus organic growth, and whether industrial and consumer demand can offset weakness in computing and communications.
  • Whether the higher gross margin is sustainable given pricing, product mix, manufacturing costs, yen exposure and acquired-intangible amortization.
  • Distributor inventory, sell-through, returns and ship-and-debit claims, including the rise in deferred distributor revenue and accounts receivable.
  • The causes and durability of the unusually low 2013 tax rates, the ongoing IRS audit, and possible tax consequences of foreign earnings repatriation.
  • Developments and potential financial or operational effects of patent litigation and the Trinity claim; the filing provides no clear estimate of potential litigation losses.
  • Whether the company continues to generate sufficient operating cash flow while funding dividends, investment and any future repurchases.