SEACOAST BANKING CORP OF FLORIDA quarterly report, Q2 FY2011

Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida — Q2 2011 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2011; unaudited. Seacoast is a Florida-based bank holding company. Unless noted otherwise, financial amounts below are in millions of dollars.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2011Q2 2010First half 2011First half 2010
Net interest income, GAAP$16.5$16.2$33.0$33.4
Provision for loan losses$0.9$16.8$1.5$18.8
Noninterest income$4.5$5.6$8.8$11.9
Noninterest expense$19.1$18.9$38.7$41.8
Net income (loss)$1.1$(13.8)$1.5$(15.4)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders$0.2$(14.7)$(0.4)$(17.2)
  • Q2 diluted and basic EPS were reported as $0.00; first-half EPS was also rounded to $(0.00), reported as $0.00 in the statement, despite the $0.4 million common-shareholder loss. Preferred dividends and discount accretion were $0.9 million for Q2 and $1.9 million for the half year.
  • Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.36% in Q2, down 12 basis points from Q1 but up 9 basis points year over year. The yield on earning assets fell to 4.12%; the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined to 0.95%.
  • Management attributed the improved first-half result mainly to substantially lower loan-loss provisioning. Q2 noninterest income was lower year over year largely because there were no securities gains; Q2 2010 included $1.4 million of such gains. Q2 expenses were up $0.2 million year over year, partly due to higher OREO and asset-disposition costs.

Financial position, cash flow and credit

  • At June 30, 2011, total assets were $2.083 billion, shareholders’ equity $171.1 million, deposits $1.681 billion, net loans $1.158 billion and cash and cash equivalents $166.9 million. Compared with December 31, 2010, assets rose $66.5 million, deposits rose $44.2 million, net loans declined $45.2 million and cash declined $44.5 million.
  • Total securities were $636.4 million, up $174.4 million from year-end, while gross loans fell $51.7 million to $1.189 billion. Deposits were down 2.0% year over year; noninterest-bearing demand deposits grew 16.4% year over year to $321.9 million. Brokered time deposits had fallen to $7.5 million.
  • Debt and borrowing included $102.8 million of repurchase agreements, $50.0 million of FHLB advances and $53.6 million of subordinated debt. The company reported $6.3 million of unpaid Series A preferred dividends and $2.5 million of deferred trust-preferred interest.
  • First-half operating cash flow was $20.2 million; investing activities used $113.6 million, primarily reflecting securities purchases; financing activities provided $48.9 million. Cash and cash equivalents declined $44.5 million during the half year.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $31.2 million, or 2.63% of loans, versus 3.10% a year earlier. First-half net charge-offs were $8.1 million; provision was $1.5 million. Nonaccrual loans were $46.2 million, down from $90.9 million a year earlier, and nonperforming assets totaled $72.0 million, down from $109.9 million.
  • Accruing troubled debt restructurings were $60.2 million. Commercial real estate remained a major exposure; real estate-secured loans represented 91.6% of total loans. Management reported that construction and land-development loans had declined substantially as part of its risk-reduction efforts.
  • Regulatory capital remained above minimums: consolidated Tier 1 capital ratio 17.65%, total risk-based capital ratio 18.92% and Tier 1 leverage ratio 10.23%. Seacoast National was reported well-capitalized, subject to an OCC agreement requiring at least an 8.50% Tier 1 leverage ratio and 12.00% total risk-based capital ratio.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • No formal earnings or financial guidance was provided. Management said lending conditions remained challenging, although loan production and the commercial loan pipeline had improved; it expected prudent lending opportunities to remain constrained by weak economic conditions. Management also said continued credit-cost moderation could support lower future charge-offs, while cautioning that losses could remain elevated.
  • Management cited Florida economic and real-estate weakness, unemployment, loan collateral values, commercial real-estate concentration, interest-rate movements, deposit competition, funding access and regulatory changes as principal risks. Results depend on estimates for loan losses, securities values, deferred taxes and contingencies.
  • The company had a $47.3 million valuation allowance against net operating loss carryforwards and reported $16.9 million of net deferred tax assets supported by tax-planning strategies. A cumulative pretax loss history is negative evidence for realization; future tax benefits remain uncertain.
  • The bank remained subject to a formal OCC agreement concerning asset quality and credit-risk management. The parent company could not receive bank dividends without prior OCC approval. Common, preferred and trust-preferred distributions remained suspended; TARP-related restrictions also limited dividends and repurchases.
  • Management did not expect pending accounting standards discussed in the filing to materially affect financial position or results, except that it was still evaluating the impact of updated troubled-debt-restructuring guidance. Management believed pending litigation was not likely to have a material adverse effect, but gave no assurance about outcomes.
  • Interest-rate modeling estimated net interest income would increase 10.5% under a 200-basis-point rate increase over 12 months; an instantaneous 200-basis-point increase was estimated to reduce economic value of equity by 9.9%. These are model estimates and depend on assumptions.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether lower provisioning and nonaccrual balances reflect durable credit improvement, and how charge-offs, OREO sales and the allowance evolve.
  • The quality and concentration of remaining commercial real-estate and other Florida real-estate exposures, including TDR performance and collateral valuations.
  • Whether loan and deposit trends support sustainable net interest income as asset yields, liquidity levels and funding costs change.
  • The conditions and approvals required to resume dividends, repay TARP preferred stock or trust-preferred obligations, and permit the bank to upstream capital to the parent.
  • The recoverability of deferred tax assets and the effect of any ownership change under Section 382 on tax attributes.