SPORTSMAN's WAREHOUSE HOLDINGS, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2016

Sportsman’s Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Period note: The request metadata says 2015 Q2, but the supplied filing is for the 13 and 26 weeks ended July 30, 2016 (fiscal 2016 Q2 and first half), compared with periods ended August 1, 2015. Amounts below are in millions unless otherwise noted.

Business context and reporting period

The company operates sporting-goods retail stores in one reportable segment. It had 70 stores in 20 states at July 30, 2016; the filing says it had 72 stores after two additional openings in August. Fiscal 2016 is a 52-week year ending January 28, 2017. Sales are seasonal, typically stronger in the third and fourth quarters.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ2 2016Q2 2015First half 2016First half 2015
Net sales$189.8$166.9$341.4$306.1
Gross profit / margin$66.2 / 34.9%$58.0 / 34.7%$114.7 / 33.6%$101.2 / 33.0%
SG&A$49.5$41.2$95.6$83.1
Operating income / margin$16.7 / 8.8%$16.8 / 10.0%$19.0 / 5.6%$18.0 / 5.8%
Interest expense$3.1$3.4$6.7$6.9
Net income$8.3$8.2$8.6$6.8
Diluted EPS$0.20$0.19$0.20$0.16
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) / margin$22.3 / 11.7%$17.3 / 10.4%$29.7 / 8.7%$22.7 / 7.4%

First-half operating cash flow was $0.4 million, versus cash used of $0.7 million a year earlier; capital expenditures were $23.4 million versus $19.4 million. Cash was $2.6 million at quarter-end. Balance-sheet working capital was approximately $84.0 million, with current assets of $275.5 million and current liabilities of $191.5 million.

At July 30, gross revolving borrowings were $75.4 million, offset by $9.3 million in lock-box deposits (balance-sheet line-of-credit amount: $66.1 million); reported availability was $44.9 million. Term-loan principal was $137.5 million. The company reported compliance with both facilities’ covenants. Total debt principal across the facilities was approximately $212.9 million.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q2 sales rose 13.7%; first-half sales rose 11.5%. Newer stores were the main driver, supplemented by same-store sales growth of 2.9% in Q2 and 0.5% in the first half.
  • Q2 gross margin improved 20 basis points; first-half gross margin improved 60 basis points. Management cited lower freight and greater vendor incentives in Q2, and less promotional pricing and higher vendor incentives for the first half. Q2 product mix shifted toward lower-margin firearms and ammunition.
  • SG&A increased 20.1% in Q2 and 15.1% in the first half, chiefly reflecting a larger store base. Excluding the prior-year $4.0 million litigation-accrual reversal, SG&A growth was 9.5% and 9.8%, respectively.
  • Q2 operating income was slightly lower despite higher sales, and operating margin fell 1.2 percentage points. Net income rose modestly in Q2 and 26.0% for the first half.
  • Firearms and ammunition demand supported comparable sales: Q2 same-store sales rose 18.5% for firearms and 10.3% for ammunition. Management partly attributed higher demand to public perceptions of possible tighter regulation. Clothing, footwear, camping, and several accessory categories were weaker.
  • Prior-year sales and cost of goods sold were revised to report certain state licenses, duck stamps, and firearm background-check transactions net rather than gross. This reduced reported prior-year sales by $6.1 million for Q2 and $11.4 million for the first half, with no effect on gross profit, net income, or EPS; the company said prior statements were not materially misstated.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • Management expected fiscal 2016 capital expenditures of $35–$40 million, versus $23.4 million spent in the first half, and planned additional store openings. It stated that cash, operating cash flow, and revolving-credit availability should fund operations for at least 12 months. The company aims to grow its store base by more than 10% annually.
  • The company made $19.7 million of term-loan prepayments in the first half, funded partly by increased revolver borrowings, and incurred a $0.15 million prepayment penalty (the MD&A also describes approximately $0.2 million including related payments). The term loan carries a 6.00% margin over LIBOR, with a 1.25% LIBOR floor; the revolver’s weighted-average rate was 1.99%.
  • Debt is floating-rate and unhedged. Management estimated a 100-basis-point rate increase would add approximately $0.7 million of annual interest expense on the revolver balance, assuming it remained outstanding for a year.
  • The Lacey Marketplace litigation remains on appeal after a court set aside a jury verdict; the company had reversed its earlier $4.0 million accrual in fiscal 2015. Management did not consider a material loss probable and estimable. Other ordinary-course legal claims were also described as not expected to have a material adverse effect.
  • Key risks include consumer-spending and economic conditions, geographic concentration in the West, competition, changing customer preferences, weather, store-expansion execution, and regulation affecting firearms and ammunition. Management reported no material change to the risk factors in its latest annual report.
  • Management was evaluating new accounting standards on revenue, inventory, leases, and stored-value breakage; impacts were not yet determined. Disclosure controls were judged effective, and no material internal-control changes were reported.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the intended reporting period: the supplied filing covers fiscal 2016 Q2, not 2015 Q2.
  • Track same-store sales, especially whether growth persists beyond firearms and ammunition and through seasonal quarters.
  • Assess store-opening returns, cash needs, and whether full-year capital spending stays within the $35–$40 million estimate.
  • Monitor borrowing-base availability, seasonal inventory funding, leverage, covenant compliance, and sensitivity to interest rates.
  • Follow the Lacey Marketplace appeal and verify any subsequent legal or accounting developments.
  • Consider the revenue-presentation revision when comparing sales growth with previously published 2015 figures; profitability was unaffected.