Protara Therapeutics, Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2016

Protara Therapeutics, Inc. (identified in the filing as Proteon Therapeutics, Inc.) — Q1 2016 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2016; balance sheet compared with December 31, 2015. The filing entity is Proteon Therapeutics, Inc.; the supplied company metadata names Protara Therapeutics, Inc.

Business context

Proteon was a late-stage biopharmaceutical company developing vonapanitase for vascular access in patients with chronic kidney disease. It had no approved products and had not generated product sales. PATENCY-1, its Phase 3 trial in radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), completed enrollment in October 2015, with top-line data expected in December 2016. PATENCY-2 began enrolling in August 2015, with enrollment completion expected in Q1 2017.

Financial results and liquidity

MetricQ1 2016Q1 2015 / prior date
RevenueNo product revenue; the statements report no revenue for the quarterNo product revenue
Research and development expense$4.349 million$2.633 million
General and administrative expense$2.470 million$1.987 million
Total operating expenses / operating loss$6.819 million$4.620 million
Other income$0.267 million$0.040 million
Net loss$6.552 million$4.580 million
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$0.40$0.28
Cash and cash equivalents$24.062 million$40.031 million at Dec. 31, 2015
Available-for-sale investments$35.326 million$25.232 million at Dec. 31, 2015
Total cash, equivalents and investments$59.388 million$65.263 million at Dec. 31, 2015
Total assets$61.342 million$67.538 million at Dec. 31, 2015
Total liabilities$3.588 million$4.133 million at Dec. 31, 2015

Net cash used in operating activities was $5.894 million, versus $3.873 million in Q1 2015. Investing activities used $10.115 million, principally reflecting purchases of available-for-sale investments net of maturities; financing activities provided $0.012 million from option exercises. Cash and cash equivalents declined by $15.969 million during the quarter. The company had no reported debt. Current assets were $60.441 million against current liabilities of $3.588 million. The filing gives no meaningful operating margin because it reported no product revenue.

Changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Net loss increased by $1.972 million, to $6.552 million. Operating expenses rose $2.199 million; management attributed the increase chiefly to higher R&D spending.
  • R&D expense increased $1.716 million. External vonapanitase costs rose $1.128 million, including $1.0 million for manufacturing pre-validation and validation and $0.1 million for clinical activity; internal R&D costs rose $0.588 million, primarily due to personnel costs.
  • G&A expense increased $0.483 million, primarily due to personnel and overhead, partly offset by lower public-company costs.
  • Other income included $0.184 million of realized and unrealized gains on foreign currency forwards. The company did not apply hedge accounting, so fair-value changes flowed through earnings.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management estimated that available cash, cash equivalents and investments would fund operations and capital expenditures into Q4 2017, including PATENCY-1 results, PATENCY-2 enrollment and CMC activities. The filing cautions that actual spending may shorten this runway and states that existing resources were not expected to fund completion of PATENCY-2.
  • The company expected increasing operating losses and anticipated needing additional capital. Its $40 million at-the-market equity program was effective, but no sales had begun as of March 31, 2016; future issuance could dilute shareholders.
  • Lonza manufacturing purchase obligations totaled CHF 9.5 million: CHF 1.9 million due within one year and CHF 7.6 million due within one to three years. The filing also describes a $1.9 million order for a batch scheduled to begin in July 2016 and a CHF 7.6 million order for four batches scheduled to begin in June 2017. Operating lease minimum payments totaled $0.378 million.
  • Key development risk: the Phase 2 primary efficacy endpoint did not show statistically significant benefit for the 30-microgram dose versus placebo. The favorable radiocephalic-AVF subgroup findings were not prespecified and may not be reproduced in Phase 3. FDA may require both Phase 3 trials or additional studies; the company only contemplated discussing a possible BLA based on PATENCY-1 if results were sufficiently compelling.
  • Other material risks include clinical efficacy, safety and enrollment; regulatory approval; reliance on third-party manufacturers and CROs; single-source API supply; Swiss franc exposure; additional financing and dilution; reimbursement and eventual market acceptance. The company reported no litigation expected to have a material adverse effect and no off-balance-sheet arrangements.
  • Disclosure controls were assessed as effective at the reasonable-assurance level, with no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether PATENCY-1 results met the primary endpoint and how the findings compare with the non-prespecified Phase 2 subgroup analyses.
  • PATENCY-2 enrollment progress, projected completion timing and the financing required to complete the trial.
  • Actual cash burn and runway relative to management’s Q4 2017 estimate, including any ATM sales or other financing.
  • Lonza manufacturing milestones, purchase commitments, foreign-exchange exposure and readiness of CMC activities for a potential filing.
  • Any FDA feedback on whether one Phase 3 trial could support a BLA, and any additional studies or manufacturing requirements.