WSFS FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

WSFS Financial Corporation — Q1 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2012; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2011. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless noted. WSFS is a Delaware-based banking and financial services company with banking, Cash Connect, and trust and wealth management businesses.

Financial performance

MetricQ1 2012Q1 2011Change
Interest income$39.2$39.2Broadly unchanged
Net interest income$32.5$30.3+8%
Noninterest income$16.8$13.6+23%
Noninterest expense$31.0$31.4-1%
Provision for loan losses$8.2$5.9+40%
Net income$6.4$4.2+53%
Net income allocable to common stockholders$5.8$3.5+64%
Diluted EPS$0.66$0.40+65%

Net interest margin was 3.57% on a tax-equivalent basis, versus 3.56% a year earlier; interest-rate spread was 3.49% versus 3.44%. The filing attributes improved earnings to higher noninterest income and net interest income, with lower expenses partly offset by a larger loan-loss provision. Securities gains were $2.0 million, compared with $0.4 million.

Financial condition, credit, and liquidity

  • Total assets were $4.33 billion, up 1% from year-end. Net loans were $2.72 billion, up about $21 million; available-for-sale securities were $890.9 million, up $31.5 million.
  • Total deposits were $3.19 billion, up $54.2 million. Borrowed funds were approximately $703.1 million at quarter-end, down from $723.6 million. Total liabilities were $3.93 billion; stockholders’ equity was $396.5 million.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $459.7 million, down $8.3 million during the quarter. Operating cash flow was $18.6 million, compared with $28.7 million in Q1 2011; investing activities used $58.9 million and financing activities provided $31.9 million.
  • The Bank reported capital ratios of 13.57% total risk-based, 12.31% Tier 1 risk-based, and 9.34% core capital, and stated it was well-capitalized. The holding company held $12.0 million in cash. Book value per common share was $45.55; tangible common book value was $35.62.
  • The allowance for loan losses was $55.8 million, or 2.01% of loans, versus $53.1 million and 1.92% at year-end. Q1 net charge-offs were $5.5 million, down from $10.2 million a year earlier.
  • Nonaccrual loans were $74.1 million, or 2.66% of loans, compared with $71.1 million and 2.58% at year-end. Nonperforming assets were $89.6 million, or 2.07% of assets, down from $91.7 million and 2.14%. Troubled debt restructurings totaled $32.0 million, up from $27.7 million at year-end.

Material changes, outlook, and risks

  • Management said commercial and industrial lending grew $25.6 million in the quarter, while residential and consumer lending declined as the company continued to change portfolio mix. Loan growth and a larger securities portfolio helped support net interest income; lower deposit funding costs were largely offset by declining mortgage-backed securities yields.
  • Credit costs rose: the provision increased to $8.2 million, and management cited risk-rating migration associated with a new risk-rating policy and procedures. The company also revised its allowance methodology; it said the changes had no material effect on the quarter’s allowance or provision.
  • Subsequent to quarter-end, WSFS began seeking bids for a possible bulk sale of about $52 million of criticized and nonperforming loans. Any sale was optional, and expected discounts could be significant. WSFS also anticipated selling about $300 million of mortgage-backed securities and reinvesting in shorter-duration securities. Management expected securities gains to offset all or much of the loan-sale loss, and anticipated that lower future securities yield could be offset in 2012 by improved total credit costs; these outcomes were not assured.
  • Key risks identified include economic and real-estate conditions, loan losses and workout costs, interest-rate and securities-market changes, regulatory changes including Dodd-Frank implementation, and uncertainty around the proposed asset sales. Management stated Q1 results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.
  • Two disclosed legal matters—a bankruptcy trustee complaint concerning a former customer loan and a putative class action over overdraft fees—had no litigation reserves because potential losses could not yet be reasonably estimated. WSFS said it was defending both matters.
  • Management reported effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the proposed loan and securities sales closed, at what prices, and how gains or losses affected subsequent results.
  • Whether the higher loan-loss provision reflects continued credit deterioration; track nonaccrual loans, TDRs, charge-offs, and allowance coverage.
  • Whether margin and earnings remain resilient as securities yields decline and funding costs change.
  • Deposit mix and reliance on brokered deposits and wholesale borrowings, alongside reported liquidity and capital levels.
  • Developments in the overdraft-fee and bankruptcy-related litigation, and any resulting reserve or expense.