ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Essex Property Trust, Inc. — Q2 2013 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2013; unaudited. Essex is a West Coast apartment-focused REIT with interests in 167 apartment communities totaling 34,514 units, five commercial buildings, and development projects in Southern California, Northern California, and Seattle.

Financial performance and key metrics

MetricQ2 2013Q2 2012Six months 2013Six months 2012
Total revenue$153.4m$132.6m$302.7m$260.5m
Income from continuing operations$29.6m$42.5m$59.3m$59.7m
Net income available to common stockholders$24.9m$37.1m$50.1m$59.8m
Diluted GAAP EPS$0.67$1.07$1.35$1.74
FFO per diluted share$1.91$1.69$3.88$3.33
Core FFO per diluted share$1.88$1.66$3.74$3.30

Q2 property revenue was $150.2m, up 15.7%. Same-property revenue rose 6.1% to $130.4m, primarily on a 6.2% increase in average rental rates; same-property financial occupancy eased 30 basis points to 96.0%. Same-property NOI was $88.7m, up 7.0%; its calculated NOI margin was approximately 68.0%, versus 67.5% a year earlier. These margins are calculated from figures in the filing.

For the first half, operating cash flow was $150.6m, compared with $129.4m. Investing activities used $281.7m and financing provided $132.7m; period-end cash and cash equivalents were $20.2m. Common dividends were $1.21 per share in Q2 and $2.42 per share for the half, versus $1.10 and $2.20, respectively, in 2012.

At June 30, total debt was approximately $2.93bn: $1.51bn mortgage debt, $1.41bn unsecured debt, and $4.4m drawn on credit lines. Unrestricted cash was $20.2m and marketable securities were $88.7m. The company reported $621m of undrawn capacity on unsecured credit facilities. Ratings were Fitch BBB+/Stable, Moody’s Baa2/Stable, and S&P BBB/Stable. A $300m issuance of 3.25% senior notes due 2023 was completed in April.

Material changes versus prior periods

  • Q2 revenue growth reflected same-property rental growth and contributions from 12 communities acquired or consolidated since January 2012. Non-same-property revenue increased 185.7% to $19.8m.
  • GAAP income fell year over year largely because Q2 2012 included a $21.9m gain on remeasurement of a co-investment. First-half 2012 also included $10.0m of discontinued-operations income, including property-sale gains. These items were absent in 2013.
  • Operating expenses increased with acquisitions: Q2 property operating costs excluding real estate taxes rose 12.3%, real estate taxes 21.8%, and depreciation 14.9%. Management also cited higher same-property repairs, utilities, and property taxes.
  • Q2 interest expense before amortization increased 6.8%, reflecting higher average debt used to fund acquisitions and development. Equity income from co-investments increased $4.2m, supported by property acquisitions, a property-sale gain, and preferred-equity prepayment income.
  • During the first half, Essex issued 817,445 common shares for net proceeds of $122.9m. Common shares outstanding were 37.3m at June 30, versus 36.4m at year-end 2012.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • No specific earnings or operating guidance is provided in the supplied filing text. Management stated that operating cash flows, cash and securities, credit availability, capital-market access, and potential property dispositions should cover reasonably anticipated cash needs over the next 12 months.
  • The development and predevelopment pipeline totaled 2,981 units, with $625.7m incurred and approximately $446.7m of estimated remaining costs; total estimated project costs were about $1.07bn. Funding may come from working capital, credit lines, securities issuances, and dispositions.
  • Fund II sold three additional properties after quarter-end for $244.0m gross proceeds. It expected to sell its remaining three communities within 12 months. Fund II repaid $42.4m of bridge loans in July; $56.8m of Wesco III bridge loans remained outstanding as of July 31 and were expected to be repaid by September 30, 2013.
  • Essex guaranteed certain development-related obligations for The Huxley and The Dylan; maximum exposure under the payment guarantee was $79.1m at June 30. Co-investments also carry their own debt and operating risks.
  • Management identified market downturns, development cost overruns or delays, refinancing and capital-access risks, and potential differences between estimates and actual results. Mold-related claims and other lawsuits are ongoing risks; potential mold and environmental liabilities were not quantifiable. Most properties are in earthquake-prone areas, and earthquake losses are among extraordinary risks for which the company does not have insurance.
  • Other unusual items included a $1.0m first-half gain on early debt retirement, a $1.5m land-sale gain, and income from early redemption of preferred-equity investments. The filing reports effective disclosure controls and no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether same-property rent growth continues and occupancy stabilizes, particularly given the 30-basis-point year-over-year occupancy decline.
  • Actual cost, timing, lease-up, and funding requirements for the $1.07bn development pipeline, including the remaining estimated $446.7m.
  • Repayment timing and terms for Wesco III bridge loans and the performance and leverage of co-investments.
  • Debt maturities, interest-rate exposure, hedging effectiveness, and continued access to credit and equity markets.
  • Disposition proceeds and timing for Fund II, and any effects on management fees, co-investment income, or guarantees.
  • Potential exposure from mold claims, earthquake losses, and the $79.1m development-related guarantee; the filing does not quantify possible mold or environmental losses.