PARK NATIONAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

Park National Corporation — Q1 2012 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. Unaudited results cover the three months ended March 31, 2012; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2011. Park is an Ohio-based bank holding company. On February 16, it sold substantially all performing loans, operating assets and liabilities of Florida subsidiary Vision Bank to Centennial Bank and retained certain troubled loans and real estate in SE Property Holdings, LLC (SE LLC). Unless noted, amounts below are in millions.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ1 2012 / March 31, 2012Comparable / prior date
Net interest income$61.7$69.3 in Q1 2011; down 11.0%
Net interest margin / spread3.97% / 3.76%4.21% / 4.00% in Q1 2011
Provision for loan losses$9.0$14.1 in Q1 2011
Net income$31.5$22.2 in Q1 2011
Net income available to common / diluted EPS$30.0 / $1.95$20.7 / $1.35 in Q1 2011
Operating cash flow$26.9$8.3 in Q1 2011
Cash and cash equivalents$161.1$157.5 at Dec. 31, 2011
Total assets / loans$6,776.9 / $4,324.4$6,972.2 / $4,317.1 at Dec. 31, 2011
Deposits$4,817.4$4,465.1 at Dec. 31, 2011
Short-term borrowings / long-term debt / subordinated debt$236.7 / $821.8 / $75.3$263.6 / $823.2 / $75.3 at Dec. 31, 2011
Stockholders’ equity$756.4; 11.2% of assets$742.4; 10.6% at Dec. 31, 2011

Q1 net income included a $22.2 million pretax ($14.4 million after-tax) gain on the Vision sale. Excluding that after-tax gain, net income would have been approximately $17.1 million, below Q1 2011’s $22.2 million; this is an approximate calculation, not a company-reported adjusted measure. Q1 2011 included a $6.6 million pretax securities-sale gain, while Q1 2012 had none.

Net interest income fell amid lower average earning assets and yields: average earning assets were $6.30 billion versus $6.72 billion, and their average yield was 4.81% versus 5.14%. Lower funding costs partly offset this pressure. Reported other income rose to $39.6 million, chiefly because of the Vision gain; excluding it, other income was $17.5 million. Other expense rose 3.2% to $47.8 million.

Cash flow was $26.9 million from operations, $(331.5) million from investing and $308.3 million from financing; cash increased $3.6 million. Investing cash flows included securities purchases and maturities and the Vision transaction. Management said its liquidity sources were more than adequate and targeted at least $800 million of available liquidity capacity.

Material changes and credit quality

  • The Vision transaction reduced reported assets and liabilities; $382.5 million of assets and $536.2 million of liabilities classified as held for sale at year-end were no longer shown in those categories at March 31. Centennial acquired about $355.8 million of loans and assumed $522.9 million of deposits and other liabilities. Park retained a portfolio including $82.3 million of nonperforming loans and $28.6 million of OREO in SE LLC.
  • Nonperforming assets were $261.9 million, down from $269.5 million at year-end and $326.6 million a year earlier. Nonperforming loans were $219.9 million, or 5.09% of loans; nonaccrual loans were $183.2 million, or 4.24%. The allowance for loan losses was $59.8 million, 1.38% of loans, versus $68.4 million and 1.59% at year-end.
  • Net charge-offs increased to $17.0 million from $9.1 million in Q1 2011; $12.1 million related to retained Vision loans marked down before transfer to SE LLC. The annualized net charge-off ratio was 1.53% versus 0.78%. Management attributed the $4.1 million SE LLC provision partly to collateral reappraisals and related charge-offs.
  • Park reported $98.6 million of nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings and $34.6 million of accruing TDRs. Modified TDRs totaling $21.2 million defaulted during the quarter under the filing’s definition of default (30 days past due). A sale agreement provision allows Centennial to return up to $7.5 million of loans through August 16, 2012; Park accrued $0.7 million for estimated exposure.
  • Regulatory capital ratios for Park were 10.35% leverage, 15.35% Tier 1 risk-based and 17.92% total risk-based at quarter-end. PNB met well-capitalized thresholds.

Outlook, commentary and other notable items

  • Management revised full-year 2012 net interest income guidance to $235–245 million from $240–250 million; it forecast Q2 net interest income of about $59 million and a 3.82% tax-equivalent margin.
  • Full-year provision guidance increased to $23–30 million from $20–27 million. Management expected quarterly provisions to be lower than Q1, but identified SE LLC collateral values and credit losses as key uncertainties.
  • Management maintained 2012 total other income guidance of $62–66 million, total other expense of $170–175 million, and an effective federal tax rate of 26%–28%. It expected quarterly other expense of about $41–42 million for the remainder of 2012.
  • Management expected very low short-term interest rates to persist through 2012. Its interest-rate simulation projected net income up 2.0% in a rising-rate scenario and down 3.4% in a declining-rate scenario over 12 months. Management cautioned that actual results may differ and identified credit, collateral values, real estate conditions, liquidity, interest-rate, regulatory, competitive and operational risks.
  • After quarter-end, Park issued $30 million of 7% subordinated notes due 2022, repurchased its $100 million Treasury preferred shares for $100.97 million including accrued dividends on April 25, and repurchased the Treasury warrant for $2.84 million on May 2. Pro forma March 31 capital ratios excluding the preferred shares were 8.89% leverage, 13.18% Tier 1 risk-based and 15.75% total risk-based.
  • The filing states disclosure controls were effective and reports no material change in internal control over financial reporting. It identifies no material pending legal proceedings.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of earnings growth is attributable to the one-time Vision sale gain, and how underlying results trend after the sale.
  • Whether credit costs, charge-offs and collateral valuations—particularly in SE LLC’s retained portfolio—continue to improve, and the ultimate loss on the Centennial loan put-back provision.
  • Whether revised net interest income and provision guidance, as well as other income and expense projections, are achieved.
  • The effects of the preferred-share and warrant repurchases and the new subordinated notes on capital, interest expense and future distributions.
  • Whether the reported liquidity capacity, deposit growth and regulatory capital remain sufficient as loans, deposits and market conditions change.