Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp quarterly report, Q1 FY2016

Filing summary

Issuer and period: The supplied filing is Rexnord Corporation’s Form 10-Q, not a filing identified as Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. It covers the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015 (Rexnord fiscal Q1 2016), compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2014. The filing describes Process & Motion Control and Water Management businesses.

Financial performance

MetricQuarter ended June 30, 2015Prior-year quarterChange
Net sales$485.1 million$503.6 millionDown 3.7%
Gross profit / margin$169.8 million / 35.0%$178.2 million / 35.4%Margin down about 0.4 percentage point
Operating income / margin$53.2 million / 11.0%$56.9 million / 11.3%Down 6.5%; margin down 0.3 point
Net income attributable to Rexnord$21.3 million$12.1 millionUp 76%
Diluted EPS from continuing operations$0.20$0.11Up $0.09
Cash provided by operations$7.9 million$6.4 millionUp $1.5 million
Capital expenditures$7.7 million$8.7 millionDown $1.0 million

Net income improved despite lower sales and operating income, principally alongside a lower tax provision: $10.0 million at a 32.1% effective rate versus $21.5 million at 65.0% a year earlier. The prior-year rate was elevated by one-time costs related to a foreign subsidiary’s U.S. tax classification.

Segments and material changes

  • Process & Motion Control: Sales were $271.6 million, down 9.0%. Core sales declined 7%; acquisitions contributed 3%, while currency translation reduced sales by 5%. Operating income fell 25.2% to $35.6 million and margin declined to 13.1% from 16.0%. Management cited weaker industrial-process demand, distributor destocking, unfavorable mix, and investment in market expansion and footprint changes.
  • Water Management: Sales increased 4.0% to $213.5 million. Excluding a 5% unfavorable currency effect, core sales rose 9%, supported by broad end-market demand and higher water-infrastructure project shipments. Operating income rose 48.1% to $27.4 million; margin improved to 12.8% from 9.0%, reflecting volume, cost reductions, productivity, and lower restructuring costs.
  • Interest expense declined to $21.6 million from $22.5 million, primarily due to lower debt. Restructuring charges were $1.9 million versus $3.4 million.
  • Mill Products operations had ceased and were presented as discontinued operations. The prior-year quarter included $6.2 million of sales and $0.4 million of net income from that business; the current quarter included no activity.

Cash, debt, and liquidity

  • Cash was $329.7 million at June 30, 2015, down from $370.3 million at March 31. Operating cash flow of $7.9 million and investing cash use of $6.1 million were outweighed by $44.6 million of financing cash use, including a $40.0 million share repurchase.
  • Total debt was $1,935.6 million, including $1,892.1 million of term-loan borrowings; long-term debt on the balance sheet was $1,912.0 million. Total debt declined modestly from $1,940.0 million at March 31.
  • Available additional borrowing capacity was reported as $342.6 million: $242.6 million under the revolving facility and $100.0 million under the receivables program. Revolver availability reflects $22.4 million of letters of credit.
  • The term loan’s effective average rate was 4.00%. Management reported compliance with credit covenants and a 4.0x first-lien leverage ratio against a 7.75x maximum maintenance covenant.
  • Working capital movements included a $42.8 million cash outflow from accounts payable. The filing does not provide a separately stated current ratio.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • The filing gives no quantified revenue, earnings, or cash-flow guidance. Management said it expects to continue restructuring and footprint optimization; the timing and amount of related future costs were not estimable.
  • Management cautioned that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results. Its forward-looking statements are subject to risks described in the company’s fiscal 2015 Form 10-K, and the company undertook no general obligation to update them.
  • Interest-rate exposure remains significant: approximately 98% of debt was variable-rate, while swaps and caps hedged about 74% of variable-rate term loans. The filing estimates a 100-basis-point rate increase would add about $3.6 million in annual interest expense at the June 30 market rate; a further 100-basis-point LIBOR increase would add about $23 million annually.
  • Foreign currency is a material exposure: approximately 32% of quarterly sales originated outside the United States. A hypothetical 10% stronger U.S. dollar was estimated to reduce equity by about $52.5 million; a 10% adverse currency move was estimated to increase forward-contract fair value by $1.0 million.
  • Asbestos-related liabilities were estimated at $35.0 million, with a corresponding $35.0 million insurance receivable recorded. Management estimated approximately $247.4 million of available insurance, but warned coverage is not assured and actual claims could differ materially. Other disclosed matters include environmental proceedings, product-related asbestos suits, and the settled PEX brass-fittings litigation.
  • The company repurchased 1,552,500 shares for $40.0 million at an average $25.76 per share; approximately $160.0 million remained under the $200.0 million authorization.
  • Early adoption of debt-issuance-cost presentation guidance reduced the reported carrying amount of debt by reclassifying $10.0 million from other assets at June 30. The company was evaluating the future revenue-recognition standard’s adoption and impact.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer identity: this source is Rexnord Corporation, despite the request metadata naming Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
  • Assess whether weakness and distributor destocking in Process & Motion Control persisted, and whether Water Management’s core growth and margin gains continued.
  • Review cash generation and working-capital trends against the substantial debt burden, share repurchases, and future capital needs.
  • Track variable-rate exposure, hedge coverage, covenant headroom, and available revolving and receivables-program capacity.
  • Monitor asbestos insurance recoverability, other legal contingencies, and the cost and timing of planned restructuring.
  • Separate the earnings improvement from the unusually high prior-year tax rate and compare results using consistent tax assumptions.