Diamondback Energy, Inc. current report, 18 April 2024

Business Context and Reporting Period

This Form 8-K, dated April 18, 2024, reports on Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s (Diamondback) proposed merger with Endeavor Parent, LLC (Endeavor). The filing serves as a supplemental disclosure to the definitive proxy statement dated March 29, 2024, issued in response to stockholder lawsuits challenging the adequacy of disclosures regarding the transaction. The supplemental information reflects data as of April 17, 2024.

Key Financial Metrics and Valuation

The filing details financial analyses performed by Jefferies, Diamondback's financial advisor, to support the merger consideration. The Merger Consideration represents an enterprise value of $26,000 million for Endeavor.

  • Endeavor Valuation:
    • Discounted Cash Flow (DCF): Implied enterprise value range of $26,249 million to $30,880 million.
    • Net Asset Value (NAV): Implied enterprise value range of $30,373 million to $32,793 million.
    • Comparable Public Companies: Implied enterprise value ranges from $5,259 million to $34,968 million depending on the metric used (TEV/EBITDA or LFCF yield).
    • Precedent Transactions: Implied enterprise value ranges from $2,668 million to $31,019 million based on transaction multiples.
  • Diamondback Standalone Valuation:
    • DCF Analysis: Implied enterprise value per share range of $124.06 to $155.95.
    • NAV Analysis: Implied equity value per share range of $176.54 to $189.69.
    • Comparable Public Companies: Implied equity value per share ranges from $98.23 to $224.01.
  • Market Context: The 30-day volume-weighted average price of Diamondback common stock as of February 9, 2024, was $153.51.
  • Debt: Diamondback's net debt as of December 31, 2023, was $5,140 million (excluding Viper Energy, Inc. net debt).

Material Changes and Litigation

Following the announcement of the Merger Agreement, three lawsuits were filed by purported stockholders challenging disclosures in the proxy statement:

  • Weiss v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et. al. (S.D.N.Y.)
  • Nicosia v. Brooks et. al. (Sup. Ct. Richmond Cnty.)
  • McDaniels v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et. al. (D. Del.)

These complaints allege violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state law claims regarding negligent misrepresentation and concealment. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to stop the stockholder vote and damages. Additionally, demand letters were sent on March 28, 2024, alleging similar deficiencies. Diamondback has voluntarily supplemented the proxy statement to address these claims, though it denies the legal necessity of the additional disclosures and asserts the allegations are without merit.

Guidance, Outlook, and Risks

The filing contains extensive forward-looking statements regarding the proposed merger, future performance, and synergies. Management notes that actual outcomes could differ materially due to various risks, including:

  • Failure to obtain stockholder or regulatory approval for the merger.
  • Uncertainty regarding the realization of anticipated synergies and integration challenges.
  • Volatility in oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids prices.
  • Geopolitical instability, including conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.
  • Regulatory changes regarding hydraulic fracturing and climate change.
  • Financial market instability and rising interest rates.

The filing explicitly states that the supplemental disclosures are not an admission of legal necessity or materiality under applicable law.

Investor Verification Checklist

  • Verify the status of the three pending lawsuits (Weiss, Nicosia, McDaniels) and any potential impact on the merger timeline or terms.
  • Review the definitive proxy statement (filed March 29, 2024) in conjunction with this supplemental 8-K to understand the full context of the valuation analyses.
  • Assess the sensitivity of the valuation ranges to the specific oil and gas price assumptions used ($75.00/Bbl for oil and $3.00/MMBtu for natural gas).
  • Monitor regulatory approvals required for the merger to close.
  • Confirm the final terms of the merger consideration and any potential changes resulting from the litigation or supplemental disclosures.