BANK OF AMERICA CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2016

Business context and reporting period

Bank of America Corporation’s unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The bank holding company reported through Consumer Banking, Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM), Global Banking and Global Markets; residual activities are in All Other. Period-end assets were $2.20 trillion.

Financial performance and condition

Amounts are in U.S. dollars; income-statement figures are for the three and nine months ended September 30, respectively, unless noted.

MetricQ3 2016Q3 2015Nine months 2016Nine months 2015
Revenue, net of interest expense$21.6B$21.0B$63.7B$63.4B
Net interest income$10.2B$9.9B$30.8B$29.3B
Provision for credit losses$850M$806M$2.8B$2.4B
Noninterest expense$13.5B$13.9B$41.8B$43.7B
Net income$5.0B$4.6B$13.2B$12.6B
Diluted EPS$0.41$0.38$1.10$1.03
  • Q3 return on average assets was 0.90%; return on average common equity was 7.27%. The reported efficiency ratio was 62.31% (66.40% a year earlier). FTE net interest yield was 2.23%, up 4 basis points.
  • At September 30, loans and leases were $905.0B, deposits $1,232.9B, long-term debt $225.1B, total assets $2,195.3B and shareholders’ equity $270.1B. Long-term debt was down $11.6B from year-end 2015.
  • Nine-month cash flow: operating activities provided $26.7B; investing activities used $63.0B; financing activities provided $17.8B. Cash and cash equivalents fell $15.9B to $143.4B.
  • Regulatory capital under Basel 3 Advanced-Transition: CET1 11.0%, Tier 1 12.4%, total capital 14.2%, and Tier 1 leverage 9.1%. The Corporation said it met the current “well-capitalized” definition.
  • Global Liquidity Sources were $522B; parent company and NB Holdings time-to-required funding was 38 months. Management estimated consolidated liquidity coverage was above the 2017 LCR requirement.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 revenue rose about 3% and net income about 7% year over year, as higher revenue and lower expenses more than offset a modestly higher credit provision. For the first nine months, revenue was nearly flat while net income rose about 5%; lower expenses and higher revenue were partly offset by higher credit provisions and taxes.
  • Net interest income increased, supported by commercial loan growth, higher short-term rates and increased debt securities balances. Q3 noninterest income improved, notably from stronger trading results; year-to-date noninterest income declined, including lower investment and brokerage, investment banking and mortgage banking income.
  • Noninterest expense decreased 3% in Q3 and 4% year to date, reflecting expense management and lower personnel costs. Provision for credit losses increased 20% year to date, including increased energy-sector reserves.
  • Credit indicators were mixed: total nonperforming loans, leases and foreclosed properties declined to $8.7B from $10.3B at year-end 2015, while nonperforming commercial loans and leases increased to $2.0B from $1.2B, primarily in energy and metals and mining. Net charge-offs were $888M in Q3, down from $932M.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

  • No specific consolidated full-year revenue or earnings guidance is provided in the supplied filing text. Management described a mixed economic environment, low rates and continued uncertainty after the U.K. EU-exit referendum; the Federal Reserve did not raise rates during the quarter.
  • The approved 2016 CCAR plan authorized $5.0B of common-stock repurchases over four quarters beginning in Q3, plus repurchases to offset equity-award dilution, and raised the quarterly dividend from $0.05 to $0.075 per share. Q3 repurchases were $1.4B. Future distributions remain subject to capital, liquidity, performance and market conditions.
  • A $350M tax charge followed enactment of U.K. tax-law changes and remeasurement of U.K. deferred tax assets. Q3 All Other results also included a net $282M increase in MSR fair value from revised valuation assumptions.
  • Effective July 1, 2016, the Corporation changed the accounting method for premiums and discounts on certain debt securities; prior periods presented were restated. The filing says the impact on regulatory capital metrics was insignificant, but previously filed capital metrics were not restated.
  • Energy risk increased: energy allowance for credit losses reached $1.0B, and higher-risk exploration/production and oil-field-services exposure had 56% of utilized exposure criticized. Sustained low oil prices could cause further deterioration.
  • Legacy mortgage matters remain material. Unresolved representation-and-warranty claims totaled $18.3B notional; the recorded liability was $2.8B, and possible loss was estimated at up to $2.0B above accruals. The filing separately estimated aggregate possible litigation losses of $0–$1.1B above accrued liabilities for matters where a range could be estimated; some matters could not be quantified.
  • Other exposures include pending litigation and regulatory matters, U.K. payment-protection-insurance claims (reserve $165M; additional expense cannot be reasonably estimated), FDIC surcharge costs, interest-rate and market risk, and potential effects of regulatory capital and liquidity rules. Management cautions actual outcomes may differ materially from estimates.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether net interest income and expense reductions can persist, and how results change with rates, deposit pricing and customer behavior.
  • Energy-sector criticized exposures, reserves and commercial nonperforming loans, including subsequent oil-price and borrower developments.
  • Actual costs and outcomes of representation-and-warranty claims, litigation, PPI claims and regulatory proceedings versus recorded reserves and disclosed possible-loss ranges.
  • Capital and liquidity after dividends, repurchases, resolution-planning transfers and any future regulatory requirements.
  • The sustainability of earnings after the $350M U.K. tax charge and the favorable MSR valuation revision, and the effect of the debt-securities accounting-method change on comparisons.